1
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoi pr. VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia
2
Institute of Chemistry, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskii pr. 26, Petrodvorets, St. Petersburg 198504, Russia
3
University of Vienna, Althanstrasse, 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
4
Department of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Urbino, 61029 Urbino, Italy
5
Department of Pharmacology & Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
6
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK
7
Research Institute of Influenza, ul. Prof. Popova 15/17, St. Petersburg 197376, Russia
8
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya ul. 29, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia
9
Institute of Experimental Medicine, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, ul. Akkuratova 2, St. Petersburg 197341, Russia
Abstract
In this paper, we compared the transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of methylglycol-chitosan (MG-CS) and diethylaminoethyl-chitosan (DEAE-CS
I and DEAE-CS
II with degrees of substitution of 1.2 and 0.57, respectively) to that of Lipofectamine (used as a reference transfection vector). MG-CS contains quaternary amines
[...] Read more.
In this paper, we compared the transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity of methylglycol-chitosan (MG-CS) and diethylaminoethyl-chitosan (DEAE-CS
I and DEAE-CS
II with degrees of substitution of 1.2 and 0.57, respectively) to that of Lipofectamine (used as a reference transfection vector). MG-CS contains quaternary amines to improve DNA binding, whereas the DEAE-CS exhibits pH buffering capability that would ostensibly enhance transfection efficiency by promoting endosomal escape. Gel retardation assays showed that both DEAE-CS and MG-CS bound to DNA at a polysaccharide:DNA mass ratio of 2:1. In Calu-3 cells, the DNA transfection activity was significantly better with MG-CS than with DEAE-CS, and the efficiency improved with increasing polysaccharide:DNA ratios. By contrast, the efficiency of DEAE-CS
I and DEAE-CS
II was independent of the polysaccharide:DNA ratio. Conversely, in the transfection-recalcitrant JAWSII cells, both Lipofectamine and MG-CS showed significantly lower DNA transfection activity than in Calu-3 cells, whereas the efficiency of DEAE-CS
I and DEAE-CS
II was similar in both cell lines. The toxicity of DEAE-CS increased with increasing concentrations of the polymer and its degree of substitution, whereas MG-CS demonstrated negligible cytotoxicity, even at the highest concentration studied. Overall, MG-CS proved to be a more efficient and less toxic transfection agent when compared to DEAE-CS.
Full article