Audiol. Res., Volume 15, Issue 3 (June 2025) – 6 articles

Background/Objectives: The conventional strategy for addressing age-related hearing loss is hearing aid (HA) use, yet many individuals underutilize their devices. Despite the positive effects of HA use, adherence remains low, highlighting the importance of studying associated variables. We hypothesize that better unaided speech perception in noise (SPiN) would be associated with greater perceived benefit from HAs, which, in turn, would be linked to increased HA use. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used, including 114 older adults (≥65 years) who were HA users. HA use and perceived benefit were assessed using questions 1 and 2 of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HAs), while unaided SPiN performance was measured monaurally with a speech-in-noise test. In the mediation analysis, SPiN performance was the predictor, perceived benefit the mediator, and HA use the outcome. Direct and indirect effects were evaluated using generalized structural equation modeling. Results: No significant total effect was found for the right ear. For the left ear, there was a significant indirect effect of SPiN performance on HA use through perceived benefit (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.57, p = 0.019) but no direct effect (p = 0.563). In addition, a significant total effect of left ear SPiN performance on HA use was observed (p = 0.041). Conclusions: The findings suggest that unaided SPiN performance—particularly in the left ear—may be indirectly associated with HA use through its effect on perceived benefit. These results underscore the potential value of including SPiN assessments in the HA fitting process and counseling strategies for older adults. Full article

Background: Single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) impair spatial hearing and speech perception, often reducing quality of life. Cochlear implants (CIs) and bone conduction implants (BCIs) are rehabilitation options used in SSD and AHL to improve auditory perception and support functional integration in daily life. Objective: We aimed to evaluate hearing outcomes after auditory implantation in SSD and AHL patients, focusing on localization accuracy, speech-in-noise understanding, tinnitus relief, and perceived benefit. Methods: In this longitudinal observational study, 37 patients (adults and children) received a CI or a BCI according to clinical indications. Outcomes included localization and spatial speech-in-noise assessment, tinnitus ratings, and SSQ12 scores. Statistical analyses used parametric and non-parametric tests (p < 0.05). Results: In adult CI users, localization error significantly decreased from 81.9° ± 15.8° to 43.7° ± 13.5° (p < 0.001). In children, regardless of the implant type (CI or BCI), localization error improved from 74.3° to 44.8°, indicating a consistent spatial benefit. In adult BCI users, localization error decreased from 74.6° to 69.2°, but the improvement did not reach statistical significance. Tinnitus severity, measured on a 10-point VAS scale, decreased significantly in CI users (mean reduction: 2.8 ± 2.0, p < 0.001), while changes in BCI users were small and of limited clinical relevance. SSQ12B/C scores improved in all adult groups, with the largest gains observed in spatial hearing for CI users (2.1 ± 1.2) and in speech understanding for BCI users (1.6 ± 0.9); children reported high benefits across all domains. Head shadow yielded the most consistent benefit across all groups (up to 4.9 dB in adult CI users, 3.8 dB in adult BCI users, and 4.6 dB in children). Although binaural effects were smaller in BCI users, positive gains were observed, especially in pediatric cases. Correlation analysis showed that daily device use positively predicted SSQ12 improvement (r = 0.57) and tinnitus relief (r = 0.42), while longer deafness duration was associated with poorer localization outcomes (r = –0.48). Conclusions: CIs and BCIs provide measurable benefits in SSD and AHL rehabilitation. Outcomes vary with age, device, and deafness duration, underscoring the need for early intervention and consistent auditory input. Full article

Background: Transparency mode in hearables aims to maintain environmental awareness by transmitting external sounds through built-in microphones and speakers. While technical assessments have documented acoustic alterations in these devices, their impact on spatial hearing abilities under realistic listening conditions remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate how transparency mode affects sound localization performance with and without background noise. Methods: Ten normal-hearing adults completed sound localization tasks across azimuth (±90°) and elevation (±30°) with and without background noise. Performance was assessed with and without AirPods Pro in transparency mode. Sound localization performance was evaluated through linear regression analysis and mean absolute errors. Head-Related Transfer Function measurements quantified changes in binaural and spectral cues. Results: While interaural time differences were largely preserved, transparency mode introduced systematic alterations in level differences (up to 8 dB) and eliminated spectral cues above 5 kHz. These modifications resulted in increased localization errors, particularly for elevation perception and in noise. Mean absolute errors increased from 6.81° to 19.6° in azimuth and from 6.79° to 19.4° in elevation without background noise, with further degradation at lower SNRs (p < 0.05). Response times were affected by background noise (p < 0.001) but not by device use. Conclusions: Current transparency mode implementation significantly compromises spatial hearing abilities, particularly in noisy environments typical of everyday listening situations. These findings highlight the need for technological improvements in maintaining natural spatial cues through transparency mode, as current limitations may impact user safety and communication in real-world environments. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the progress in auditory speech perception in a group of children with cochlear implants and additional disabilities, whose implants were implanted at a public hospital in southern Chile between 2013 and 2019. This population has historically been excluded from research due to uncertainties regarding their outcomes. Methods: All pediatric patients who received cochlear implants between 2013 and 2019 were considered for inclusion. After obtaining informed consent, relevant data were collected from their medical records. A total of 18 children met the inclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed using Jamovi software. Results: The minimum age at cochlear implant activation was 2 years, and the maximum was 16.1 years. The median Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) score was 0 pre-implantation and increased to 2 to 12 months post-implantation. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation provides clear benefits for children with additional disabilities. Although gains in auditory perception may be limited in some cases, implantation enables access to the world of sound. Even when oral language development is not fully achieved, parents frequently report positive changes in their children’s interaction with their environment, suggesting an overall improvement in quality of life. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss (HL) is a prevalent condition that can lead to social exclusion. This review explores the epidemiological, cultural, and social dimensions of HL and examines the barriers to accessibility that individuals with HL encounter. Methods: This research employs a narrative review approach to provide a comprehensive overview of HL, focusing on stigma, gender disparities, cultural and social differences, and accessibility challenges. Results: The review highlights pervasive prejudices surrounding HL and hearing devices. Gender disparities are evident, with Deaf women facing compounded challenges. Cultural perspectives on HL differ widely, ranging from the medical model, which emphasizes treatment using hearing devices, to the Deaf community’s social model, which views deafness as a cultural identity. Socioeconomic disparities further restrict access to modern technologies, particularly in low-income settings, while intersectional discrimination affects marginalized groups within the Deaf community. Public spaces also present significant barriers related to communication, architecture, and technology, which hinder accessibility for individuals with HL. Conclusions: A cultural shift is essential to dismantle societal stereotypes and reduce discrimination associated with HL. Moreover, improving accessibility for individuals with HL necessitates a multifaceted approach, including accessible design, staff training, and the integration of assistive technologies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss, particularly in older adults, is associated with reduced physical functioning; increased fall risk; and altered gait patterns, including slower walking speed and shorter step length. While the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, one possibility is that these gait changes result from an additional cognitive load due to hearing difficulties. Prior research suggests that hearing aids may improve balance; however, their impact on gait remains less well explored. Methods: This study investigated gait parameters in individuals with hearing loss as they walked with and without hearing aid amplification under different dual-task conditions. Additionally, we showed the potential of ear-worn sensors for detecting relevant gait changes. To achieve this, we used a hearing-aid-integrated accelerometer and our open-source EarGait framework comprising gait-related algorithms specifically developed for ear-worn sensors. Results: Our findings revealed no significant differences in gait velocity or step length between the unaided and aided conditions. For stride time, we observed a significant interaction effect; however, the effect size was negligible. The dual-task costs were lower than in previous reports, indicating that the applied dual-task paradigm did not induce the expected cognitive demand. The ear-worn gait analysis system showed strong performance compared to foot-worn sensors. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that in controlled, low-cognitive-demand settings, hearing aid amplification does not affect gait performance and, therefore, neither hinders nor improves walking performance. Additionally, the high accuracy of the ear-worn gait analysis system highlights the strong potential of ear-mounted wearable devices (“earables”) for real-world mobility assessments. Future research should explore more complex real-world conditions to better understand the impact of hearing aids on walking behavior. Our proposed earable-based system offers a promising tool for continuous, unobtrusive gait monitoring in everyday environments. Full article