Traditional classification based on morphological characters suggests that the genus 
Ostericum is closely related to 
Angelica, but molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that the genus 
Ostericum is related to 
Pternopetalum rather than 
Angelica. In this study, the plastomes of nine 
Ostericum species
            
 [...] Read more.
        
            Traditional classification based on morphological characters suggests that the genus 
Ostericum is closely related to 
Angelica, but molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that the genus 
Ostericum is related to 
Pternopetalum rather than 
Angelica. In this study, the plastomes of nine 
Ostericum species and five 
Angelica species were used to conduct bioinformatic and comparative analyses. The plastomes of 
Ostericum and 
Angelica exhibited significant differences in genome size, gene numbers, IR junctions, nucleotide diversity, divergent regions, and the repeat units of SSR types. In contrast, 
Ostericum is more similar to 
Pternopetalum rather than 
Angelica in comparative genomics analyses. In total, 80 protein-coding genes from 97 complete plastomes and 112 ITS sequences were used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees. Phylogenies showed that 
Angelica was mainly located in Selineae tribe while 
Ostericum was a sister to 
Pternopetalum and occurred in the 
Acronema clade. However, morphological analysis was inconsistent with molecular phylogenetic analysis: 
Angelica and 
Ostericum have similar fruit morphological characteristics while the fruits of 
Ostericum are quite different from the genus 
Pternopetalum. The phylogenetic relationship between 
Angelica and 
Ostericum is consistent with the results of plastome comparisons but discordant with morphological characters. The cause of this phenomenon may be convergent morphology and incomplete lineage sorting (ILS).
            
Full article