Safety

Forestry logging is among the most hazardous economic activities, so identifying where hazards and risks concentrate supports targeted prevention. This scoping review mapped evidence on logging hazards and risks, their co-occurrence with operations, and preventive measures. PRISMA-ScR was followed. Only peer-reviewed journal articles (2015–2025) in English on occupational hazards/risks, risk-assessment methods or preventive measures in logging were included, found in Scopus, Web of Science, Inspec and Dimensions (last search 15 September 2025). Independent data screening and extraction were performed by two reviewers, with a third reviewer resolving any disagreements. No formal risk-of-bias appraisal was conducted. Forty-two studies were included. Hazards and risks concentrated in three phases—chainsaw/manual cutting, skidding/cable yarding, and loading/short-haul transport—where acute injury mechanisms (struck-by events, slips/trips/falls, rollovers, lacerations) coexisted with chronic exposures (musculoskeletal strain, noise, vibration, diesel exhaust). Preventive measures emphasised engineering and organisational controls, complemented by raining and PPE, but were inconsistently specified and evaluated. Evidence was heterogeneous and geographically concentrated in few countries, limiting generalisability. A small set of tasks consistently concentrates acute and chronic risks; prevention should integrate accident control and health protection, prioritising engineering/organisational measures supported by training and PPE. Future studies should standardise descriptors and outcome metrics to enable comparisons.

Background: Since the introduction of rental e-scooters, they have become a popular mode of transportation not only in German cities but in other cities as well. However, this rapid increase in usage has coincided with a significant rise in associated injuries and accidents, outpacing those related to bicycles. A disproportionate number of these incidents involve alcohol consumption and young people under the age of 25, with a low incidence of helmet use. Following the example of driver training for children on bicycles, we carried out driver safety training with e-scooters and examined the results scientifically. Methods: The study conducted three voluntary driving safety training sessions in Berlin and Munich, with participants completing questionnaires before and after the training to measure their knowledge and skills (on a scale between 0 and 5; 0 = totally insecure and 5 = absolutely secure). The training included a technical introduction, practical exercises, and an educational component on injury data and prevention strategies. During the statistical analysis, the novice drivers (group 1) were compared to the non-novice drivers (group 2). Results: Out of 136 participants, 103 completed the training (a response rate of 75.7%). The mean age of the participants was 37.1 years, and 52.4% of them were female. A total of 59% had never used an e-scooter and were therefore assigned to group 1 (group 2 = experienced drivers). Both groups showed significant improvements in both knowledge of traffic laws and driving skills. Conclusions: The findings suggest that driving safety training potentially enhances the safe operation of e-scooters. However, the training demands a high level of time and motivation, making it less attractive for younger drivers who are most prone to accidents. Therefore, we recommend the use of digital driving safety training before the first use of e-scooters.

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) in educational settings is a vital responsibility that is often inconsistently implemented. There is a need for research to bridge the gap between policy and practice. This study employed a cross-sectional mixed-methods design in six schools in the capital city of Indonesia to identify key implementation barriers, strategies, and compliance levels in OHS. Data were collected from 217 teachers using a structured KPAP (Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, Practices) survey and from an additional 38 teachers via Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Quantitatively, teachers showed highly positive attitudes (99.4% viewing OHS as a professional duty) and generally positive perceptions but implementation practices were sub-optimal (e.g., low participation in drills and PPE usage), showing a gap between awareness and action. Qualitatively, the main barriers identified were a lack of specific OHS regulation or guidance for schools, limited resources/infrastructure, and the perception of OHS as a low priority. Management strategies focused on external collaboration and ongoing in-school initiatives. In conclusion, a significant gap exists between OHS awareness and its integration into school management, highlighting the urgent need for strengthened governance, comprehensive policies, and sustained capacity-building to ensure a proactive, safe, and sustainable school environment for staff and students.