Nursing Reports

Background/Objectives: Sex trafficking is a form of modern-day slavery still present in our societies. Health professionals are in a key position to identify and support victims, but adequate training is required. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of a structured educational intervention on knowledge, perceived professional role, and attitudes toward sex trafficking of women among undergraduate nursing students at the University of Seville, Spain. Methods: A cluster randomized pilot educational trial with a pre-test–post-test control group design and one-year follow-up was conducted. A two-hour educational session addressed key concepts related to sex trafficking, health professionals’ responsibilities, and survivor support. Knowledge and attitudes were assessed at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at one-year follow-up. Results: 199 students participated. Significant post-intervention improvements were observed in knowledge and attitudes, with sustained impact after one year despite some knowledge decay. Conclusions: This pilot educational intervention appears to improve knowledge and attitudes toward sex trafficking among undergraduate nursing students and may represent a useful strategy for sensitizing and training future health professionals in this area.

Background/Objectives: Low-income compared to high-income women have a higher incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer (CC) due to lower screening rates (under/never-screened). Home-based screening for CC via mailed “self-collection” for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an alternative to traditional, provider-collected screening that may be more acceptable to low-income women. Theoretically, adoption of a recent technology, in this case, mailed return of self-collection, is related to the Diffusion of Innovations concepts of advantages and complexity. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically test scales to measure advantages and complexity of self-collection in a low-income, under/never-screened population. Methods: Low-income women (n = 168) were recruited in person from food pantries and online using Facebook in the Midwest U.S. After a baseline survey, women were mailed a self-collection kit. We assessed reliability with item analysis and Cronbach’s α and evaluated validity with exploratory factor analysis and t-tests, using mailed kit return as the independent variable. Results: Two scales were developed: (1) advantages (Cronbach’s α = 0.84), item–total correlation = 0.51 to 0.69, and (2) complexity (Cronbach’s α = 0.82), item–total correlation = 0.45 to 0.64. Exploratory factor analysis supported items factoring on their respective scales, and t-tests supported a relationship between each scale and mailed return of kits. Conclusions: Both the advantages and complexity scales demonstrated reliability and validity among low-income women. Future studies should evaluate these scales in a larger, more diverse population. Nurses could use these scales to assess preferences and difficulties associated with self-collection and aid patients with CC screening decision-making.

Background: Nurses have unique insights into health systems yet remain underrepresented in policy processes. Strengthening political competence is widely regarded as important for evidence-informed nursing leadership. Objectives: To assess self-perceived political competence and policy participation among nurses and nursing students in Croatia. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey using open, non-probability recruitment. Of 447 individuals who opened the survey link, 440 provided responses and 390 completed all 19 competence items measuring political competence across three domains (attitudes, knowledge/evidence, and skills). Open recruitment precluded calculation of a conventional response rate. A 19-item self-report questionnaire measured political competence across three domains (attitudes, knowledge/evidence and skills); internal consistency was α = 0.91, although the Croatian version has not been fully validated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, binomial tests and ordinal logistic regression on the complete-case sample. Results: Most respondents endorsed nurses’ policy involvement, the importance of scientific evidence and nursing’s holistic perspective. Conclusions: Nurses and nursing students reported strong conceptual support for a policy role but only moderate confidence in influencing policy. These cross-sectional findings highlight a gap between conceptual support and personal confidence that may be addressable through structured educational and institutional support; the impact of such initiatives on policy influence should be examined in future longitudinal or interventional studies.