Nursing Reports

Background: Professional identity and ethical integrity are foundational to nursing practice and are shaped in part by educational experiences. This study evaluated an online Holocaust and genocide educational seminar delivered to fourth-year Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students and explored how students linked seminar content to professional identity formation, ethical vigilance, and patient advocacy. Methods: We conducted a descriptive mixed-methods educational evaluation. Students completed an anonymous pre-seminar survey (demographics, motivations for studying nursing, self-identified desirable professional qualities, and self-rated knowledge of the Holocaust and other genocides) and an anonymous post-seminar feedback survey with four open-ended questions. Quantitative items were summarized descriptively; qualitative data were analyzed using inductive qualitative content analysis. Results: Of the 205 students who attended the seminar, 133 completed the pre-seminar survey, and 110 completed the post-seminar survey. Students reported high baseline knowledge of the Holocaust but limited knowledge of the Armenian and Rwandan genocides. The five themes that emerged are as follows: (1) ethical judgment and the influence of nurses; (2) patient advocacy and social justice; (3) the effect of historical and contemporary trauma on students’ learning experience; (4) genocide awareness and prevention; and (5) approaches to education and content presentation. Conclusions: Carefully facilitated Holocaust and genocide education, delivered through interactive online pedagogy and structured debriefing, may support late-stage nursing students’ reflection on ethical integrity and professional identity during the transition to professional practice.

The exponential growth of artificial intelligence has transformed global information ecosystems, introducing complex technological challenges that extend far beyond its computational capabilities [...]

Background: Fatigue is a multidimensional and subjective experience, and it is one of the most common symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting up to 80% of patients and acting as a major driver of work disability. Despite its clinical significance, existing assessment tools often lack conceptual clarity or remain too lengthy for routine clinical use. Objective: To develop and evaluate a new patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess multidimensional fatigue domains in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) for use in clinical practice. Methods: This study was carried out in three research stages. Stage 1 (Concept Elicitation) involved qualitative interviews (n = 19) to identify core fatigue domains based on patient experience. Stage 2 (Cognitive Interviews) consisted of interviews with 50 patients to ensure the relevance and clarity of the items. Stage 3 (Exploratory Factor Analysis) and internal consistency testing (Cronbach’s alpha) were performed on the same sample of 50 patients to examine the preliminary factor structure and reliability. Results: Concept elicitation identified lack of energy and persistent exhaustion as core symptoms. The resulting 14-item instrument covers three subdomains: Psychosocial, Physical, and Cognitive. Exploratory factor analysis supported a three-factor solution explaining 75% of the total variance (Factor 1: 28%; Factor 2: 27%; Factor 3: 20%). Internal consistency was high across all factors: Psychosocial (α = 0.923), Physical (α = 0.895), and Cognitive (α = 0.844). Conclusions: This new instrument is a conceptually robust tool that captures the interconnected nature of fatigue in multiple sclerosis (MS). These initial findings support its internal structure and conceptual foundation, providing a practical tool for symptom monitoring in neurological consultations.