Trauma Care

Post-traumatic lymphedema (PTL) is a chronic and often under-recognized sequela of soft tissue trauma, leading to persistent swelling, functional impairment, and increased risk of infection. While lymphedema is traditionally associated with oncologic interventions, growing evidence highlights the significant burden of PTL in trauma patients. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the current understanding of PTL, including epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies. PTL often occurs after high-impact musculoskeletal injuries (such as open fractures with significant soft tissue loss) or burns (especially if deep or circumferential). This risk is increased if injury occurs at critical areas of increased lymphatic density (such as anteromedial leg, medial knee, medial thigh, medial elbow, or medial arm). Advances in imaging techniques, including indocyanine green lymphography and magnetic resonance lymphangiography, have improved early detection and classification of PTL. Management approaches range from conservative therapies, such as complete decongestive therapy (CDT), to surgical interventions, including lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and vascularized lymph vessel transfer (VLVT)/lymph-interpositional-flap transfer (LIFT). We report on our experience with two patients. At our center, we diagnose and stage PTL with ICG lymphography and trial CDT for 6 months. If there is no significant improvement, we recommend LVA. If there is insufficient improvement after 12 months, we recommend LIFT/repeat LVA/VLNT. We also treat open fractures with significant soft tissue defects with LIFT, as prophylaxis against PTL. PTL remains an underdiagnosed condition, necessitating increased awareness and intervention to prevent long-term disability.

Objective: There is scarce reporting of radial head fracture epidemiology and patient characteristics beyond age and sex. This study aimed to describe demographic, socioeconomic, and injury pattern characteristics for people sustaining a radial head fracture admitted to trauma centers over a 15-year period. Methods: Analysis of Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry data was conducted to describe the demographic and case characteristics of patients with radial head fractures admitted to collaborating hospitals. Cohort and case characteristics were compared by center type (Level 1 vs. other trauma centers). Results: A total of 991 cases with a unilateral radial head fracture were recorded over 15 years, with 827 admitted to Level 1 trauma centers and 164 admitted to other centers. The mean age at time of injury was 48.7 years (SD 19.7), with male predominance (n = 621, 62.7%). Most patients resided in major cities (n = 824, 85.2%), were treated under the universal healthcare system (n = 546, 56.1%), and had no Charlson Comorbidity Index conditions (n = 738, 74.5%). A higher proportion of patients managed at Level 1 centers were male (65.7% vs. 47.6%), younger (mean 47.7 vs. 53.7 years), living in major cities (86.6% vs. 78.5%), and working prior to injury (71.3% vs. 57.1%). Over 85% of the cohort sustained concomitant injuries, with Level 1 centers receiving a higher proportion of multiple injury cases (87.8% vs. 73.2%). Elbow dislocations constituted the largest proportion of concomitant injuries (n = 257, 25.9%). Conclusions: This study has provided new insights into the demographic characteristics, comorbidity status, and associated injuries of radial head fracture populations admitted to Level 1 and other trauma centers, using long-established registry data.

Background: In recent years, endovascular repair has outpaced open repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI), calling for updated evaluation of severity grading systems to ensure continued efficacy in guiding clinical decision-making. Methods: A retrospective review assessed all adult presentations of blunt thoracic TAI to a single institution from 2005 through 2018. Associations of severity grade with demographics, presentation variables, intervention, and outcomes were analyzed. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included in the analysis. Repair (all endovascular) was pursued in 20 (53%) patients. By grade, 0% of grade 1, 20% of grade 2, 82% of grade 3, and 0% of grade 4 injuries were repaired. Hospital mortality was 16%, and median hospital length of stay was 18 days (IQR 9, 28). Conclusions: A uniform four-grade severity grading system continues to be useful in guiding clinical management for TAI in an environment that is increasingly utilizing endovascular repair.