European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) frequently coexist and share heterogeneous cognitive manifestations, yet their specific performance patterns on Wechsler scales remain poorly systematized. This meta-analysis synthesized data from 31 studies using the WISC-IV, WISC-V, WAIS-III, and WAIS-IV to compare cognitive index profiles in individuals with ASD, ID and ASD+ID. Standardized mean differences (Hedges’ g) were calculated using random-effects models, adopting a normative reference of mean 100 and SD 15. Results showed a distinct profile for ASD, with greater impairments in the Processing Speed Index (PSI) and Working Memory Index (WMI), while the Vocabulary Comprehension Index (VCI), Perceptual/Fluid Reasoning Index (PRI/FRI), and Visual Processing Index (VPI) remained close to normative scores. In contrast, ID and ASD+ID exhibited generalized deficits across all indices, with the lowest scores in Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) and broad effects above g = −2.5. No significant differences emerged between Wechsler versions or age-based test types. Heterogeneity was high in ASD and ID across outcomes, but negligible in ASD+ID due to reduced k. These findings reinforce that ASD presents a specific cognitive pattern, whereas ID and ASD+ID display diffuse impairment, and that Wechsler scales are consistent across versions for identifying these profiles.

University students worldwide experience considerable health challenges. We examined health inequalities in a nationwide, gender-balanced sample of 1105 German students, considering negative (stress, depression, burnout) and positive health outcomes (self-rated health [SRH], well-being) alongside vertical (subjective social status [SSS], parental academic background) and horizontal (gender) determinants. Analyses used bivariate statistics, multivariate regressions, and interaction terms. Higher SSS was associated with better SRH (β = 0.322) and well-being (β = 0.355), and lower stress (β = −0.154), depression (β = −0.127), and burnout (β = −0.219). First-generation students reported highly significant poorer SRH and well-being than students with one (β = 0.114; β = 0.112) or two academic parents (β = 0.162; β = 0.192). Students with two academic parents showed lower stress (β = −0.087, p = 0.007) and burnout (β = −0.099, p = 0.002). Interactions suggest a protective effect of higher SSS on depression (β = −0.219, p = 0.026) and burnout (β = −0.264, p = 0.006), more pronounced among male students, who additionally benefited more from an academic household regarding SRH (β = 0.100, p = 0.044). These findings underscore intersectional and multifaceted inequalities among German students and the need for interventions.

(1) Background: Perinatal loss is a deeply painful and often invisible experience, with a significant impact on mental health. This study aimed to assess levels of psychopathological symptoms, shame, and perceived social support according to the type of perinatal loss; explore the relationships between these variables; and analyze the mediating effect of perceived social support on the relationship between shame and symptoms, as well as the moderating effect of the type of loss. (2) Methods: A total of 501 Portuguese women who had experienced perinatal loss participated in the study, recruited through an online questionnaire. Psychopathological symptoms, shame, perceived social support, and type of loss were assessed. Analyses included descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, normality and homogeneity of variances tests, and mediation and moderation models with PROCESS. (3) Results: The results revealed high levels of anxiety and depression, and moderate levels of shame. Perceived social support, especially from partners and family members, was high. Shame correlated positively with symptoms and negatively with social support. Only social support from friends significantly mediated the relationship between shame and psychological distress. (4) Conclusions: These results reinforce the protective role of support networks and the importance of clinical interventions focused on reducing shame.