Creating Cultures and Structures of Opportunity in STEMM Ecosystems

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "STEM Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2026) | Viewed by 2112

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Diana Natalicio Institute for Hispanic Student Success, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Interests: inclusive science and STEMM; organizational change; hispanic-serving institutions
Department of Educational Leadership and Foundations, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Interests: community colleges; hispanic-serving institutions; teaching and learning

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Administration, Rehabilitation, and Postsecondary Education, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
Interests: community colleges; STEM pathways; minority-serving institutions/hispanic-serving institutions; student mobility; system-wide change; interrogation of contextual factors—institutional (structure, process, and policy), geographic, demographic, political, and economic contexts

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Diana Natalicio Institute for Hispanic Student Success, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Interests: graduate pathways in STEM; multi-institutional postsecondary networks; theory to practice; research intensive hispanic serving institutions

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Diana Natalicio Institute for Hispanic Student Success, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
Interests: creating equitable and inclusive STEMM environments; organizational change in higher education; computing education at hispanic-serving institutions

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Remedying and repairing historically enduring disparities for minoritized students in science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine (STEMM) fields will require higher education institutions to move toward systemic approaches that aim to fix institutions and institutional cultures that do not serve students. There are compelling new developments in emergent research on organizational and systemic approaches that can advance equitable STEMM outcomes. This Special Issue invites, therefore, research on those approaches that can generate more effective strategies to transform STEMM education to become more inclusive for all students. The aim is to provide key lessons on how to transform the science education enterprise in order for all students to be successful in science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine (STEMM) fields. While recognizing the importance of diagnosing what is wrong in the enterprise, the Special Issue is more focused on highlighting what works to transform organizations and systems, enabling them to become more effective at serving all students.

We recognize that, in emphasizing a systemic approach, there are many layers and methods involved in constructing and implementing efforts to advance STEMM opportunities. Accordingly, we invite authors who employ multiple disciplinary and interdisciplinary perspectives, including those from different social science and the STEMM fields themselves, as well as collaborators across these fields, to submit manuscripts to this Special Issue. Manuscripts that examine systemic factors at different levels – whether at the broader societal level, the university or college level, or down to the department, program, or individual level – are welcome. Moreover, manuscripts that take a systemic approach by examining how the relationships across two or more of these levels shape STEMM opportunities will be of great interest. We also invite authors to explore the roles of different stakeholders in shaping a more inclusive STEMM enterprise, including faculty, administrators, staff, students, industry professionals, non-profits, public agencies, and governmental and private-sector funders. We are particularly interested in manuscripts that address the potential to advance systemic STEMM transformations in understudied institution types—such minority-serving institutions and community colleges. Manuscripts situated in global, international, and comparative perspectives are also welcome. We encourage authors to consider the multiple and intersecting social identities of those engaged in efforts to condition the potential to expand STEMM opportunities for all students. Fundamentally, we believe that lessons can be learned from many different approaches and we are most interested in manuscripts that generate novel insights and solutions to address the pressing needs to serve and prepare current and future demographic populations to thrive in STEMM fields.

Papers may be submitted from now until 10 February 2026 as papers will be published on an ongoing basis. Please contact any of the editors with questions or ideas for submission.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Anne-Marie Nunez
Dr. Erin Doran
Prof. Dr. Felisha Herrera Villarreal
Dr. Azuri L. Gonzalez
Dr. Edwin J. Perez
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine
  • interdisciplinary
  • systemic approach
  • organizational change
  • transformation
  • higher education
  • minority-serving institutions and community colleges

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 562 KB  
Article
Confidence Through Community: Promoting Student Self-Efficacy Through Peer Support Networks to Engage and Retain STEM Students
by Maria Luz Espino, Clark R. Coffman and Corinna A. Most
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(5), 762; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16050762 (registering DOI) - 11 May 2026
Viewed by 13
Abstract
Self-efficacy—one’s belief in their ability to take the actions necessary to succeed—is a critical determinant of student success and retention, particularly during the transitional first two years of undergraduate study. Learning communities that incorporate peer mentors have been identified as promising structures for [...] Read more.
Self-efficacy—one’s belief in their ability to take the actions necessary to succeed—is a critical determinant of student success and retention, particularly during the transitional first two years of undergraduate study. Learning communities that incorporate peer mentors have been identified as promising structures for fostering self-efficacy, yet the mechanisms by which intentional peer mentoring within structured career development contexts shapes students’ self-efficacy beliefs remain underexplored. This study examined the following research questions: (1) How does participation in a career-focused Learning community course shape first- and second-year STEM students’ sense of self-efficacy regarding academic and career decision-making? (2) In what ways do peer mentors and peer support networks within the learning community contribute to students’ self-efficacy development? (3) How do students describe feeling empowered—or not—to pursue their career goals as a result of this experience? Using a mixed-methods design that combined pre- and post-course surveys, semi-structured focus groups, and phenomenological one-on-one interviews, we investigated the self-efficacy development of first- and second-year STEM students (N = 53) enrolled in a semester-long learning community course at a large, predominantly White public institution in the Midwest. Of these, 25 students completed both the pre- and post-course Career Self-Efficacy surveys and were included in matched statistical analyses. Three major findings emerged: (1) the learning community class environment created a space where self-efficacy was prioritized and developed; (2) peer support groups and peer mentors positively impacted students’ self-efficacy; and (3) students felt empowered by the experience in pursuing their chosen career goals. These findings have practical implications for the design of learning communities in STEM, highlighting the value of intentional peer mentoring structures and career-focused activities as tools for promoting student confidence, retention, and long-term academic success. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creating Cultures and Structures of Opportunity in STEMM Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 919 KB  
Article
Exploring How Holistic Teaching and Institutional Support Relate to Community College STEM Students’ Momentum and Self-Efficacy in Career-Relevant Competencies
by Xiwei Zhu, Xueli Wang and Aikebaier Nadila
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020317 - 15 Feb 2026
Viewed by 850
Abstract
This study investigates how holistic teaching practices and institutional support at community colleges shape science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’ momentum and self-efficacy in career-relevant competencies. Using survey data from three community colleges, we apply structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess these [...] Read more.
This study investigates how holistic teaching practices and institutional support at community colleges shape science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’ momentum and self-efficacy in career-relevant competencies. Using survey data from three community colleges, we apply structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess these relationships while accounting for institutional variation using multi-group analysis. Our findings demonstrate that holistic teaching practices are positively associated with students’ curricular, cognitive, and meta-cognitive momentum, indicating that integrated, supportive classroom instruction contributes to sustained engagement and self-regulated learning in STEM pathways. Holistic teaching practices also show a marginal positive relationship with career readiness self-efficacy and professional and interpersonal self-efficacy, with cognitive and meta-cognitive momentum mediating these associations. In contrast, institutional support is not related to students’ momentum but is positively associated with professional and interpersonal self-efficacy, which may point to its role in shaping broader skill development independent of short-term academic engagement. These findings suggest that holistic teaching practices and institutional support differentially contribute to students’ academic momentum and career-related self-efficacy, which highlights the importance of coordinated efforts across classroom and institutional levels within the broader STEM ecosystem in fostering both short-term engagement and long-term professional competencies among diverse community college STEM learners. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creating Cultures and Structures of Opportunity in STEMM Ecosystems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop