Strengths and Assets of the Early Childhood Workforce

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Early Childhood Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 October 2025 | Viewed by 1687

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Health & Human Services, California State University, Long Beach, CA, USA
Interests: early care and education; professional development; program evaluation; community-based research

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Interests: early care and education; child care access; human development and family studies; policy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The ECE workforce provides highly specialized services to support the early development of children amid high demands; however, there is presently tension in the field between recruiting, retaining, and advancing a highly qualified workforce and maintaining a high quality and quantity of program conditions and available supports. As a result, there is an ongoing discussion about how to advance the profession and also support the wellbeing of the early childhood workforce. Previous approaches to this work have stemmed largely from a deficit model emphasizing the need to improve teaching quality by increasing workforce knowledge and skills, primarily via educational and professional development programs. Additionally, there is need for holistic perspectives that consider the extent of interrelatedness of ECE workforce conditions, quality, and wellbeing, as a majority of research examines these factors separately. Specifically, to understand what leads to persistence in the ECE field, we must examine the personal capacities of the ECE workforce in combination with professional supports. For these reasons, there is need for strength-based research on the experiences, skills, resources, and assets the early childhood workforce possesses. By utilizing an approach that considers the many positive characteristics and experiences of the workforce, we can create a narrative that emphasizes strengths and provides rich discussion for meaningful levers of change to grow the workforce in positive directions.

Early childhood professionals include individuals paid to care for, educate, or provide services to children aged 0-5 years old and their families aimed at improving their lives. These professionals may serve in a variety of ECE settings including family childcare, faith-based programs, center-based care, Early Head Start, Head Start, and Pre-K. This includes, but is not limited to, caregivers, teachers, administrators, program leaders, and direct service providers.

This Special Issue of Education Sciences aims to address gaps in existing scholarly work by providing original empirical studies (employing qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods research designs) and systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses that address the following topics (among others):

  1. How do the strengths and assets of the ECE workforce interact with environmental conditions to promote quality?
  2. A holistic approach to teaching quality that includes the strengths and assets of the ECE workforce.
  3. Person-centered approaches examining the strengths and assets of the ECE workforce.
  4. What skills and resources does the ECE workforce have available to provide culturally competent services and support diverse learners?
  5. What formal and informal supports facilitate aspects of workforce wellbeing within ECE programs?
  6. What experiences, skills, resources, and assets are related to ECE workforce persistence?
  7. What resources, approaches, and policies have been effective in supporting and advancing the ECE workforce?

Dr. Michelle Taylor
Dr. Christina Stephens
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ECE workforce
  • early childhood professionals
  • early care and education

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 256 KiB  
Article
Scalability of Leadership Development Program in a State Professional Development System
by Yujin Lee, Anne Douglass, Becky DelVecchio, Amanda Wiehe Lopes, Songtian Zeng and Yiyang Guan
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 609; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050609 - 15 May 2025
Viewed by 230
Abstract
Cultivating leadership within the early care and education (ECE) workforce is crucial for driving quality improvement and systems change. However, there is limited understanding of how to develop and scale leadership development programs for early educators. To address this need, Leading for Change [...] Read more.
Cultivating leadership within the early care and education (ECE) workforce is crucial for driving quality improvement and systems change. However, there is limited understanding of how to develop and scale leadership development programs for early educators. To address this need, Leading for Change (LFC) was intentionally designed to provide scalable, affordable, and accessible leadership development opportunities for early educators from diverse racial, ethnic, linguistic, and cultural backgrounds. The present study examined whether the scaled version of LFC (delivered by locally trained facilitators) could achieve outcomes comparable to the pilot version (delivered by the original LFC developers). The results showed similar improvements in participants’ entrepreneurial leadership mindset and knowledge across both versions. Also, interviews with facilitators revealed key factors, strengths, and challenges that could influence the success of scaling efforts. These findings offer valuable insights into how leadership development models can be effectively developed and scaled to ensure equitable and widespread access for the ECE workforce. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strengths and Assets of the Early Childhood Workforce)
14 pages, 1036 KiB  
Article
Institutional Belonging and Social Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Perceived Ostracism Among Preservice Teachers
by Anastasia Vatou, Maria Evangelou-Tsitiridou, Evridiki Zachopoulou and Vasilis Grammatikopoulos
Educ. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050552 - 29 Apr 2025
Viewed by 919
Abstract
The teaching profession is consistently ranked as one of the most stressful occupations worldwide, creating an urgent need for teacher education programmes to prepare highly skilled and reliant educators. Rooted in social cognitive theory, this study aims to explore preservice teachers’ social self-efficacy [...] Read more.
The teaching profession is consistently ranked as one of the most stressful occupations worldwide, creating an urgent need for teacher education programmes to prepare highly skilled and reliant educators. Rooted in social cognitive theory, this study aims to explore preservice teachers’ social self-efficacy beliefs and examine its associations with institutional belonging and perceived ostracism. Social self-efficacy describes one’s confidence in one’s ability to engage in interpersonal relationships, and institutional belonging reflects the extent to which one feels valued and accepted within an institution, while ostracism reflects one’s experience of social exclusion. Two hundred and seventy-one preservice teachers from Greece were recruited to participate in this study via convenience sampling. The measures used were the Perceived Social Self-Efficacy scale (PSSE), Institutional Belongness questionnaire (IB), and Workplace Ostracism Scale (WOS). The results of descriptive statistics showed that preservice teachers’ levels of sense of belonging and social self-efficacy were moderate to high, while they experienced low levels of perceived ostracism. The results of regression analyses indicated that institutional belonging positively correlated with social self-efficacy and negatively with perceived ostracism. The mediation analysis results demonstrated that social self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between institutional belonging and perceived ostracism. Collectively, the findings highlight the importance of developing a supportive educational environment that promotes both a sense of belonging and efficacy beliefs. Enhancing these factors could support preservice teachers’ wellbeing and commitment to the profession and inform policies and practices that promote inclusive educational environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Strengths and Assets of the Early Childhood Workforce)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop