Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering

A special issue of Brain Sciences (ISSN 2076-3425). This special issue belongs to the section "Neural Engineering, Neuroergonomics and Neurorobotics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 May 2026 | Viewed by 3664

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Edmond and Lily Safra International Institute of Neuroscience, Macaíba, Brazil
Interests: brain–machine interface; neurorehabilitation; implantable and wearable devices

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Neuroengineering bridges the basic scientific research and clinical practice, translating discoveries into interventions that can improve human health and well-being. Neuroengineering emerged as an interdisciplinary field, building on advances in neuroscience, engineering, computer science, robotics, and prosthetics. Its roots trace back to early studies of the nervous system and the development of electrical devices. The invention of implantable devices, such as cochlear implants in the 1960s, marked a significant milestone by demonstrating an interface with neural tissue to restore a sensory function. Progress in neuroscience, microelectronics, materials science, and computational modeling propelled neuroengineering, enabling the creation of invasive and non-invasive human–machine interfaces, neural prosthetics, and advanced neuromodulation techniques. Neuroengineering has no borders and integrates the next generation of inter-multidisciplinary approaches to understand and develop innovative methods for interfacing with the nervous system. In recent years, rapid advances in technology, coupled with the creativity and drive of a new generation of scientists, have sparked a wave of innovation that is reshaping the field of neuroengineering. These early-career researchers are bringing fresh perspectives, introducing new theoretical frameworks, and designing interesting experimental approaches. By integrating sophisticated computational tools, machine learning techniques, and increasingly precise neural recording technologies, they are helping to bridge gaps between traditionally separate areas of research. This interdisciplinary momentum is opening up new ways to explore and interpret the complexity of nervous system function, from single-cell activity to large-scale neural networks. As the field continues to embrace open data sharing, collaboration across disciplines, and greater methodological rigor, these collective efforts are well-positioned to tackle fundamental challenges — from understanding the neural basis of behavior to developing more effective treatments for neurological disorders.

This Special Issue aims to explore motor, cognitive, auditory, visual, tactile, pain, and synesthetic trends and challenges in neuroengineering studies that will have a significant impact on local and global health priorities. Neuroengineering research can restore, augment, or understand the sensory, motor, and cognitive functions of the nervous system, ranging from basic to clinical research using wearable or invasive neurotechnologies. Recent cutting-edge research has shed light on a wide range of innovative approaches for neuromodulation, not only for controlling neural interfaces but also for modulating behavior. However, as these techniques advance with the potential to impact human cognition and behavior, there is an increasing need for scientific discussions addressing the ethical, legal, and social implications of such interventions.

In this issue, we encourage articles addressing:

  • Next-generation brain–computer interfaces (BCIs): Non-invasive, invasive, and bidirectional BCIs for communication, motor control, sensorial, and cognition enhancement.
  • Neural signal decoding and neural data analytics: Advanced algorithms, including deep learning, for decoding brain activity in real-time.
  • Wireless and miniaturized neural implants: Developments in bioelectronics to enable chronic, untethered brain monitoring and stimulation.
  • Neurophotonics and optical neuromodulation: Using light-based tools like optogenetics and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for precise neural control.
  • Flexible, biocompatible neurointerfaces: Materials science advancements for electrodes and scaffolds that conform to brain tissue.
  • Closed-loop neuromodulation for neurological disorders: Therapies for epilepsy, Parkinson's, chronic pain, and depression.
  • Neuroprosthetics and sensory restoration: Restoring motor and sensory function through interface-driven prosthetic systems.
  • Neuroengineering for mental health: Brain stimulation and real-time monitoring tools for treating depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, and addiction.
  • Cognitive augmentation and memory enhancement: Experimental technologies aimed at boosting attention, learning, or memory storage/retrieval/erasure.
  • Personalized brain therapies via artificial intelligence (AI): Using patient-specific data to create digital models of the brain for tailored treatment.
  • Brain-inspired AI and neuromorphic computing: Mimicking neural architectures for low-power, high-efficiency computation.
  • Connectomics and whole-brain mapping: High-resolution mapping of structural and functional networks in the human brain.
  • Multiscale brain simulation models: Integrating molecular, cellular, and systems-level brain models for predictive neuroscience.
  • Neuroengineering and machine learning convergence: Leveraging AI to model brain activity, classify disorders, and optimize neural device performance.
  • Neuroethics: Addressing the right to brain privacy, identity, and agency in a neuroconnected world.
  • Equity in access to neurotechnologies: Bridging socioeconomic and global gaps in availability and affordability.
  • Data privacy and security in neural interfaces: Protecting sensitive neural data from misuse, especially in commercial BCI applications.
  • Regulatory frameworks for neural devices: Accelerating policy development for safety, efficacy, and accountability in neuroengineering products.
  • Human-AI symbiosis and hybrid intelligence: Designing systems where AI and the human brain cooperate, potentially enhancing both.
  • Scalability and translation from lab to clinic: Overcoming barriers in manufacturing, clinical trials, and real-world usability of neural devices.
  • Interdisciplinary capacitation and collaborative ecosystems in neuroengineering: Building cross-disciplinary teams and training frameworks to drive innovation.
  • Translational neuroengineering: from bench to bedside: Advancing technologies from basic research to clinical and commercial implementation.
  • Neuroengineering policy and public engagement: government, industry, and society: Fostering collaboration across sectors to ensure responsible, inclusive innovation.

Dr. Edgard Morya
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Brain Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neuroengineering
  • human interface
  • brain interface
  • neuromodulation
  • neurorobotic
  • neuroethic
  • artificial intelligence
  • neurotechnology
  • neurorehabilitation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

21 pages, 674 KB  
Article
Algorithmic Habituation: A Neurocognitive and Systems-Based Framework for Human–AI Co-Adaptation
by Narcisa Carmen Mladin, Dana Rad, Dumitru Ștefan Coman, Miron Gavril Popescu, Maria Iulia Felea, Radiana Marcu and Gavril Rad
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(5), 473; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16050473 - 28 Apr 2026
Viewed by 556
Abstract
Background/Objectives: As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly embedded in everyday cognitive tasks, human–AI interaction is no longer limited to tool use but evolves into a dynamic process of mutual adaptation. While extensive research has examined algorithmic learning, far less attention has been given [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly embedded in everyday cognitive tasks, human–AI interaction is no longer limited to tool use but evolves into a dynamic process of mutual adaptation. While extensive research has examined algorithmic learning, far less attention has been given to how users progressively adapt to AI systems. This paper introduces the concept of algorithmic habituation, defined as the gradual accommodation of users to the regularities and predictive patterns of AI systems. The objective is to provide a neurocognitive and systems-based framework that explains this phenomenon. Methods: The study develops a conceptual and integrative framework grounded in classical theories of habituation, neuroplasticity, predictive processing, and systems theory. Building on these foundations, we propose a mechanistic model of human–AI co-adaptation, conceptualized as a recursive feedback loop involving repeated interaction, pattern recognition, expectation stabilization, and cognitive economy. In addition, a typology of algorithmic habituation is advanced, alongside proposed empirical pathways for future validation, including scale development, experimental paradigms, and longitudinal designs. Results: The proposed framework suggests that repeated interaction with AI systems leads to stabilization of cognitive expectations, reduced cognitive effort, and increased behavioral standardization. This process extends beyond perceptual habituation into higher-order domains, including decision-making, creativity, and moral judgment. The typology identifies four primary forms of algorithmic habituation: cognitive, decisional, creative, and moral. The model predicts both adaptive outcomes (efficiency, reduced cognitive load) and maladaptive consequences (reduced reflexivity, automation bias, and potential erosion of critical thinking). Conclusions: Algorithmic habituation represents a novel construct at the intersection of neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and human–AI interaction. By framing user adaptation as a form of neurocognitively grounded habituation within recursive systems, this paper contributes a new perspective to understanding AI integration in human cognition. The framework has implications for digital wellbeing, education, and AI ethics, and opens multiple avenues for empirical research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2851 KB  
Article
Stimulus Size Modulates Periodic and Aperiodic EEG Components in SSVEP-Based BCIs
by Gerardo Luis Padilla and Fernando Daniel Farfán
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(4), 424; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16040424 - 18 Apr 2026
Viewed by 732
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential-based Brain–Computer Interfaces face a critical trade-off between system accuracy and user visual fatigue. To address this challenge, the objective of this study was to determine how the spatial manipulation of stimulus size modulates the full spectral dynamics of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential-based Brain–Computer Interfaces face a critical trade-off between system accuracy and user visual fatigue. To address this challenge, the objective of this study was to determine how the spatial manipulation of stimulus size modulates the full spectral dynamics of the Electroencephalogram, encompassing both the periodic oscillatory response and the aperiodic (1/f) background noise. Methods: Twenty-two healthy subjects completed a sustained visual attention task using a competitive stimulus paradigm (20 Hz and 30 Hz) presented in three spatial dimensions (Small, Medium, and Big). Parieto-occipital brain signals were decomposed using the spectral parameterization algorithm (SpecParam) to extract frequency-specific visually evoked response power and the aperiodic slope, while visual fixation was continuously monitored via eyetracking. Results: Increasing stimulus size induced a statistically significant gain in the power of the attended signal (Target) without increasing the response of the peripheral distractor. Simultaneously, larger stimuli produced a significant increase in the aperiodic slope during 20 Hz attention and visual rest, suggesting increased cortical inhibition and a reduction in broadband neural activity. This aperiodic modulation was not observed at 30 Hz. Conclusions: The improvement in Signal-to-Noise Ratio with increasing stimulus size arises from a dual neurophysiological mechanism: enhancement of the periodic evoked response together with a reduction in background neural noise. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 10981 KB  
Article
NeuroGator: A Low-Power Gating System for Asynchronous BCI Based on LFP Brain State Estimation
by Benyuan He, Chunxiu Liu, Zhimei Qi, Ning Xue and Lei Yao
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(2), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020141 - 28 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 723
Abstract
The continuous handling of the large amount of raw data generated by implantable brain–computer interface (BCI) devices requires a large amount of hardware resources and is becoming a bottleneck for implantable BCI systems, particularly for power-constrained wireless systems. To overcome this bottleneck, we [...] Read more.
The continuous handling of the large amount of raw data generated by implantable brain–computer interface (BCI) devices requires a large amount of hardware resources and is becoming a bottleneck for implantable BCI systems, particularly for power-constrained wireless systems. To overcome this bottleneck, we present NeuroGator, an asynchronous gating system using Local Field Potential (LFP) for the implantable BCI system. Unlike a conventional continuous data decoding approach, NeuroGator uses hierarchical state classification to efficiently allocate hardware resources to reduce the data size before handling or transmission. The proposed NeuroGator operates in two stages: Firstly, a low-power hardware silence detector filters out background noise and non-active signals, effectively reducing the data size by approximately 69.4%. Secondly, a Dual-Resolution Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) model controls the main data processing procedure on the edge side, using a first-level model to scan low-precision LFP data for potential activity and a second-level model to analyze high-precision LFP data for confirmation of an active state. The experiment shows that NeuroGator reduces overall data throughput by 82% while maintaining an F1-Score of 0.95. This architecture allows the Implantable BCI system to stay in an ultra-low-power state for over 85% of its entire operation period. The proposed NeuroGator has been implemented in an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) with a standard 180 nm Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) process, occupying a silicon area of 0.006mm2 and consuming 51 nW power. NeuroGator effectively resolves the resource efficiency dilemma for implantable BCI devices, offering a robust paradigm for next-generation asynchronous implantable BCI systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

20 pages, 1367 KB  
Review
Deep Learning Decoding of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) for Real-Time Mobile Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Narrative Review from Laboratory Settings to Lightweight Engineering Applications
by Hanzhen Zhang and Chunjing Tao
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(4), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16040387 - 31 Mar 2026
Viewed by 969
Abstract
Background/Objectives: SSVEP-BCI has broad application potential in mobile human–computer interaction due to its high information transfer rate and stable signal characteristics. The introduction of deep learning technology has significantly advanced SSVEP decoding performance, offering novel approaches for processing short-duration signals and tackling [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: SSVEP-BCI has broad application potential in mobile human–computer interaction due to its high information transfer rate and stable signal characteristics. The introduction of deep learning technology has significantly advanced SSVEP decoding performance, offering novel approaches for processing short-duration signals and tackling complex classification tasks. The establishment of the Tsinghua Benchmark dataset provides a standardized benchmark for evaluating algorithm performance, accelerating the development of deep learning-based SSVEP decoding. However, a summary of SSVEP deep learning decoding technologies for real-time mobile applications is lacking. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of SSVEP deep learning decoding studies published since 2023, using the Tsinghua Benchmark dataset. This review focuses on technical developments targeting real-time performance, low computational complexity, and high robustness. Results: We summarize the key technologies developed for real-time mobile SSVEP decoding. Our analysis thoroughly examines how these techniques address core challenges in the engineering implementation of mobile brain–computer interfaces, including real-time processing requirements, resource constraints, and environmental robustness. Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive overview of SSVEP deep learning decoding technologies for mobile applications, establishing a technical foundation to advance mobile brain–computer interfaces from laboratory settings to practical deployment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Trends and Challenges in Neuroengineering)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop