Next Issue
Volume 3, September
Previous Issue
Volume 3, March
 
 

Hospitals, Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2026) – 6 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 759 KB  
Review
Reconsidering Hospital Transfers from Residential Aged Care: A Scoping Review of Determinants, Prevalence, and System-Level Solutions in Australia
by Emma-Kaitlin Murphy, Magnolia Cardona, Caitlin Dixon, Samantha Fien, Danielle Ní Chróinín and Ebony T. Lewis
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020013 - 6 Jun 2026
Viewed by 815
Abstract
To identify the determinants, prevalence, and proposed solutions for potentially avoidable hospital transfers (PAHT) of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents in Australia, a scoping review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2015 to 2025. [...] Read more.
To identify the determinants, prevalence, and proposed solutions for potentially avoidable hospital transfers (PAHT) of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents in Australia, a scoping review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering the period from 2015 to 2025. The database search identified 1350 articles, of which 43 studies met inclusion criteria. Prevalence of PAHT ranged from of 8.5% to 95.2% when defined as specific conditions manageable by an outreach service; from 2.2% to 55.6% when defined as potentially manageable with primary care; and from 11.6% to 53% when defined as an Emergency Department (ED) presentation not requiring a hospital admission. The most frequently reported determinant of PAHT pertained to the overarching theme of RACF clinical decision-making and systemic RACF practice-based factors. Establishment of, and access to, outreach services was the main proposed solution, alongside onsite General Practitioners (GP), Advance Care Planning (ACP), and capacity building for RACF nurses. Despite Australia’s diversity, our findings demonstrate patterns and similarities in prevalence, determinants and solutions. Consensus or standardisation of denominators would enhance comparability of outcomes across studies. These findings offer opportunities to reconsider solutions in response to the chronic challenge of avoidable nursing home patient transfers. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 218 KB  
Brief Report
Surgeon Temperament and Workflow Adherence During Custom Implant Procedures: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
by Layton Vosloo
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020012 - 13 May 2026
Viewed by 344
Abstract
Patient-matched implants (PMIs) enable precise anatomical reconstruction but often introduce unforeseen intraoperative challenges that can provoke stress, reduce frustration tolerance, and influence surgical decision-making. Despite the growing clinical use of PMIs, the behavioural and psychological dimensions underpinning these challenging surgeries remain underexplored. This [...] Read more.
Patient-matched implants (PMIs) enable precise anatomical reconstruction but often introduce unforeseen intraoperative challenges that can provoke stress, reduce frustration tolerance, and influence surgical decision-making. Despite the growing clinical use of PMIs, the behavioural and psychological dimensions underpinning these challenging surgeries remain underexplored. This study examined the relationship between surgeon temperament, specifically frustration tolerance threshold, patience, and adherence to planned surgical workflows during PMI procedures. A qualitative thematic study was conducted over 22 months across two academic centres and 86 private surgical practices in South Africa. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with consultant surgeons, assistant surgeons, surgical technologists, and biomedical engineers, supplemented by direct observation and detailed field notes. Inductive content analysis, thematic coding, and descriptive quantitative trends derived from Likert-style questionnaires were used to identify behavioural patterns associated with intraoperative stress and workflow deviation. Participant reports indicated that low frustration tolerance, often expressed as impatience, was perceived to be linked to increased deviations from surgical plans, including implant modification (reported in 4.6% of the 86 practices), even when design and fit were optimal. In 2.3% of the 86 practices surveyed, surgical team members reported incidents where impatience was perceived to have compromised patient safety. Stress inoculation theory and emotional intelligence frameworks offered explanatory models for the observed behaviours. Within the limits of this exploratory qualitative study, surgeon temperament—particularly mental preparedness and frustration tolerance—emerged as a recurring theme associated with intraoperative PMI workflow adherence. Whether these factors are determinants of workflow adherence whilst using high-fidelity PMIs, or merely correlated with other unmeasured variables, remains to be tested in future quantitative research. Full article
27 pages, 827 KB  
Systematic Review
Recent Rural Hospital Closures and Service Disruptions in the United States: A Rapid Systematic Review
by Annabella Bellard, Andrea Otti, Enoc Carbajal, Jaelyn Moore and Cristian Lieneck
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020011 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 4024
Abstract
Rural hospitals are essential access points for healthcare delivery in the United States, yet they continue to experience disproportionate rates of closure and service disruption that threaten community health, economic stability, and equity. This rapid systematic review synthesizes recent peer-reviewed evidence examining rural [...] Read more.
Rural hospitals are essential access points for healthcare delivery in the United States, yet they continue to experience disproportionate rates of closure and service disruption that threaten community health, economic stability, and equity. This rapid systematic review synthesizes recent peer-reviewed evidence examining rural hospital closures and service disruptions, with emphasis on financial, policy, workforce, and performance-related factors and their downstream impacts. Guided by PRISMA methodology, four databases were searched for U.S.-based studies published between January 2024 and June 2025. Following screening and consensus-based review, 59 articles met inclusion criteria. Across studies, financial vulnerability, characterized by revenue instability, low patient volumes, unfavorable payer mix, and reliance on non-operating revenue, emerged as a dominant precursor to closure and service reductions. Policy context, particularly Medicaid expansion status, telehealth and broadband infrastructure, and reimbursement adequacy, strongly shaped hospital sustainability. Closures and service disruptions were consistently associated with increased travel distances, reduced access to maternal, surgical, mental health, and chronic care services, higher prices at surviving hospitals, and increased strain on remaining providers. Workforce shortages further compounded these challenges. Collectively, findings demonstrate that rural hospital closures reflect interconnected structural weaknesses rather than isolated organizational failure. Coordinated policy action, targeted financial stabilization, workforce development, and technology-enabled care models are necessary to mitigate continued erosion of rural healthcare access. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2168 KB  
Review
Demolition, Construction, and Aspergillus Risk: Seeing Stripes or a Tiger? A Critical Narrative Review and Perspective
by Kangkang Tang and Stella Barnass
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020010 - 22 Apr 2026
Viewed by 891
Abstract
Environmental disturbances from hospital demolition and construction can aerosolise pathogenic fungal spores, particularly those of Aspergillus species, posing a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. This paper presents a structured narrative review of representative case studies to evaluate the relationship between demolition activities and [...] Read more.
Environmental disturbances from hospital demolition and construction can aerosolise pathogenic fungal spores, particularly those of Aspergillus species, posing a serious threat to immunocompromised patients. This paper presents a structured narrative review of representative case studies to evaluate the relationship between demolition activities and airborne Aspergillus exposure, with a focus on clinical risk and environmental monitoring. Three exemplar studies were selected to illustrate high-intensity short-duration demolition, prolonged mechanical demolition, and meteorologically integrated risk assessment. By examining these cases, this review identifies gaps in current knowledge, methodological limitations, and challenges in causal attribution. The analysis supports the development of a novel conceptual framework for assessing and managing Aspergillus-related risks during hospital redevelopment, offering a structured approach to future infection prevention and control strategies. This framework is intended as a conceptual tool to support evidence-informed decision-making while acknowledging the limitations inherent in a targeted narrative review rather than a systematic synthesis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 710 KB  
Article
Nurse–Patient Assignment in Oncology Infusion Centers: A Mixed-Integer Programming Approach to Minimizing Patient Wait Time and Balancing Nurse Workload
by Maryam Keshtzari and Bryan A. Norman
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020009 - 30 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1311
Abstract
Cancer center infusion departments are often challenged with scheduling a large number of patients while having a limited number of nurses available to administer the infusions. Cancer patients have different acuity levels depending on many factors, such as treatment plans, drug side effects, [...] Read more.
Cancer center infusion departments are often challenged with scheduling a large number of patients while having a limited number of nurses available to administer the infusions. Cancer patients have different acuity levels depending on many factors, such as treatment plans, drug side effects, and health status. Thus, several factors need to be considered when assigning patients to nurses, as unbalanced nurse-to-patient assignments affect patient flow and nurse workload. This study introduces a mixed-integer programming model for nurse–patient assignments that minimizes patient wait times while ensuring workload balance among oncology nurses, while addressing the limited attention in existing studies to jointly modeling patient acuity and nurse continuity. The model also explores the effects of maintaining nurse continuity for patients desiring the same nurse throughout their treatments. Because the mixed-integer programming model can become difficult to solve when there are many cancer patients, an alternative nurse–patient assignment heuristic is proposed and evaluated. Numerical examples based on data from a regional cancer center compare the effectiveness and performance of the exact and heuristic methods. The results show that patient wait time and workload variation among nurses increase when there is a stronger requirement to maintain nurse continuity, which could negatively affect both patient and nurse satisfaction. This study provides valuable insights into the nurse–patient assignment problem and helps cancer infusion centers determine the impacts of maintaining different levels of nurse continuity in their settings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 260 KB  
Article
Patient-Drug Related Factors Associated with Nonadherence to Chronic Treatment in Patients Attending a Primary Care Setting in South Africa
by Lucky Norah Katende-Kyenda
Hospitals 2026, 3(2), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/hospitals3020008 - 25 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1199
Abstract
Background: Medication nonadherence among patients with chronic diseases represents a major challenge in healthcare systems worldwide and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, increased hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs. Patient-drug related factors such as knowledge of treatment, beliefs about medication, and the experience [...] Read more.
Background: Medication nonadherence among patients with chronic diseases represents a major challenge in healthcare systems worldwide and is associated with poor clinical outcomes, increased hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs. Patient-drug related factors such as knowledge of treatment, beliefs about medication, and the experience of side effects may significantly influence adherence behaviour. Methods: A cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted among 80 patients receiving treatment for chronic conditions at a primary healthcare facility in South Africa. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a standardized questionnaire that assessed demographic characteristics and patient-drug-related factors potentially associated with medication adherence. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Version 30.0.0.0 (172). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics, while inferential analyses, including chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests, were applied to determine associations between demographic variables, patient-drug related factors, and medication nonadherence. Results: The majority of participants were female, aged between 41 and 50 years, single, unemployed, and had completed secondary education. Most participants lived in rural areas, and HIV/AIDS was the most commonly reported chronic condition. Significant associations with medication nonadherence were identified for the experience of medication side effects and inadequate knowledge about treatment. These factors demonstrated moderate effect sizes and suggest that both clinical and educational aspects of treatment may influence adherence behaviour. Conclusions: Patient-drug related factors, particularly medication side effects and insufficient knowledge regarding treatment, play a significant role in medication nonadherence among patients with chronic conditions in primary care settings. Interventions aimed at improving patient education, counselling regarding medication side effects, and strengthening patient-provider communication may help improve adherence and treatment outcomes. Full article
Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop