Objectives: The widespread adoption of three-dimensional (3D)-printed resins in restorative dentistry has introduced significant challenges in establishing strong and lasting bonds with resin-based cements. Despite the development of numerous surface treatment techniques designed to improve adhesion, a clear consensus on the most effective approach remains elusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the impact of various surface treatment protocols on the bond strength of 3D-printed resins. By comparing treated versus untreated surfaces, the study aimed to determine the most reliable strategies for enhancing adhesion, ultimately offering evidence-based guidance to inform clinical decision-making. Methods: This review identified relevant studies through a comprehensive search of MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, and EMBASE databases, supplemented by manual reference checks, to identify in vitro studies published up to February 2025. Studies assessing the bonding of 3D-printed resins following various surface treatments and bonding protocols were included. Data on bond strength outcomes, such as shear bond strength, microtensile bond strength, and microshear bond strength, were extracted. Data extraction included study details, type of 3D-printed resin and printing technology, surface treatment protocols, bond strength testing methods, storage conditions, and results. The quality of included studies was assessed using the ROBDEMat tool. Meta-analyses were performed using the Review Manager Software (version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark), with statistical significance set at
p < 0.05. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the Cochran Q test and the I
2 inconsistency test. Results: Nine studies met the criteria for qualitative analysis, with eight included in the meta-analysis. The findings revealed that surface treatment protocols significantly enhanced the immediate bond strength to 3D-printed resins (
p = 0.01), with only sandblasting and silane demonstrating a statistically significant effect (
p < 0.007). Similarly, after aging, surface treatments continued to improve bond strength (
p = 0.01), with sandblasting and hydrofluoric acid being the only methods to produce a significant increase in bond strength values (
p < 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis underscores the importance of combining mechanical and chemical surface treatments, especially sandblasting and silane application, to achieve reliable and durable bonding to 3D-printed resins.
Full article