Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .

Medicina

Medicina is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all problems related to medicine, published monthly online. 
It is the official journal of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (LUHS). The Lithuanian Medical Association (LMA)Vilnius UniversityRīga Stradiņš UniversityUniversity of Latvia, and University of Tartu are affiliated with Medicina, serving as their official journal. Members of these organizations receive discounts on the article processing charges.
Indexed in PubMed | Quartile Ranking JCR - Q1 (Medicine, General and Internal)

All Articles (12,776)

  • Systematic Review
  • Open Access

Totally Endoscopic Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

  • Florin Anghel,
  • Mircea Ioan Alexandru Bistriceanu and
  • Cătălin-Constantin Badiu
  • + 14 authors

Background and Objectives: Totally endoscopic aortic valve replacement (TE-AVR) is a minimally invasive technique offering potential benefits of reduced surgical trauma and faster recovery compared with median sternotomy or other minimally invasive access. While isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) is well established through conventional and minimally invasive access, large-scale evidence for the totally endoscopic approach remains limited. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the safety and feasibility of TE-AVR by aggregating perioperative outcomes, including mortality, stroke, conversion, bleeding, paravalvular leak (PVL), and atrial fibrillation (AF). Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of totally endoscopic or thoracoscopic AVR were eligible. After independent screening and selection, data were analyzed using a single-arm proportion model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of individual studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024610128). Results: A total of 11 studies comprising 1135 patients were included. The pooled perioperative mortality was 0.00% (95% CI 0.00–0.23; I2 = 0.0%), indicating highly consistent results across cohorts. The stroke incidence was 0.69% (95% CI 0.00–2.07; I2 = 42.7%), confirming the low cerebrovascular risk of this approach. Conversion to sternotomy occurred in 0.00% of cases (95% CI 0.00–0.17; I2 = 0.0%), with no statistical heterogeneity observed. Reintervention for bleeding occurred in 1.75% (95% CI 0.34–3.85; I2 = 43.4%), while PVL was reported in 1.24% (95% CI 0.00–4.22; I2 = 64.0%). AF incidence was 10.54% (95% CI 3.79–19.70; I2 = 90.5%), with substantial between-study heterogeneity, likely related to non-standardized definitions of new-onset AF and variability in postoperative rhythm monitoring and reporting across studies. Conclusions: TE-AVR is a safe and feasible technique associated with very low perioperative mortality, bleeding, and stroke rates, as well as low PVL incidence. The absent conversion rate in our pooled analysis highlights the technical reliability of the procedure. Variability in AF reporting underscores the need for future randomized studies with harmonized definitions. Overall, TE-AVR offers a promising minimally invasive alternative for aortic valve replacement, with potential advantages in recovery (pooled ICU stay 1.86 days), hospital stay (pooled 7.98 days), and aesthetic outcomes.

7 February 2026

PRISMA flow chart [10].

Metabolic and Immune Vulnerability in Critically Ill Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

  • Mădălina Diana Daina (Fehér),
  • Codrin Dan Nicolae Ilea and
  • Cristian Marius Daina
  • + 5 authors

Background and Objectives: Diabetes mellitus is frequently encountered in critically ill patients and is associated with increased short-term mortality. However, the biological and clinical determinants of mortality within the diabetic intensive care unit (ICU) population remain incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate laboratory parameters at ICU admission and key early ICU course variables, including acute complications and organ support interventions, associated with short-term ICU mortality in critically ill patients with diabetes mellitus. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including adult patients with diabetes mellitus admitted to a tertiary care ICU between January and December 2024. Demographic data, laboratory parameters at ICU admission, acute complications, and ICU interventions were collected. Patients were stratified according to ICU outcome (survivors vs. non-survivors). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of ICU mortality. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/ROC), Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and Brier score. Results: A total of 443 critically ill patients with diabetes mellitus were included, of whom 239 (54.0%) died during ICU hospitalization. Non-survivors exhibited higher admission blood glucose, lactate levels, and serum creatinine, as well as lower lymphocyte counts compared to survivors. Acute complications, including sepsis, acute kidney injury, and acute respiratory failure, were significantly more frequent among non-survivors. In multivariate analysis, admission lactate levels (OR = 1.02 per mg/dL increase), mechanical ventilation (OR = 47.30), and hemodialysis (OR = 3.38) remained independently associated with ICU mortality. The predictive model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC = 0.87) and adequate calibration. Conclusions: Critically ill patients with diabetes mellitus who do not survive ICU hospitalization present with early metabolic stress, immune dysregulation, and organ dysfunction. Admission lactate levels and the need for advanced organ support are key predictors of short-term mortality, supporting their role in risk stratification within the diabetic ICU population.

7 February 2026

Background and Objectives: Chronic tinnitus in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is frequently linked to psychological distress and affective temperament traits. This study examined audiological characteristics, psychological profiles, and their interrelations in adults with tinnitus. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional single-centre study, 38 adults with chronic tinnitus and bilateral SNHL underwent otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure-tone audiometry. Participants were classified into two audiometric groups: high-frequency gently sloping (N = 19) and ski-slope hearing loss (N = 19). The audiological and psychological assessment included the THI, TFI, TEMPS-A, and STAXI-2. Groups were compared using non-parametric statistics (Mann–Whitney U, Chi-square). Relationships between anger and psychological variables were examined using Spearman correlations. Results: Females were more frequently represented in the gently sloping group (p = 0.044) and showed greater quality-of-life impairment (p = 0.045) and lower hyperthymic scores (p = 0.004). Patients with gently sloping loss had longer tinnitus duration (p = 0.026), while cyclothymic temperament was higher in the ski-slope group (p = 0.013). THI scores differed significantly between audiometric groups (p = 0.011). State and trait anger were strongly associated with several affective temperaments, and sleep disturbance correlated with both anger and anxious temperament. THI correlated positively with anxious temperament and sleep impairment. Conclusions: Audiometric phenotype, affective temperament, and anger-related traits are closely intertwined with tinnitus severity and its psychological burden. These findings support the need for multidisciplinary assessment in the management of tinnitus.

7 February 2026

Tetanus, a disease caused by the neurotoxin-producing bacteria Clostridium tetani (C. tetani), remains a serious threat, particularly among individuals who are unvaccinated or under-vaccinated. Although public health guidelines in the United States continue to recommend a well-established, multi-dose vaccination schedule to prevent tetanus, recent revisions to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention webpage language on vaccine safety prompted renewed public discussion. Despite this, extensive evidence continues to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of tetanus immunization, and certain demographic groups remain disproportionately at risk. Globally and within the United States, natural disaster zones remain especially high-risk environments for tetanus infection. This review examines the pathophysiology of tetanus, current vaccination recommendations, and the social and geographic inequities that influence vaccine uptake. It also evaluates strategies of protection and prevention. Particular emphasis is placed on tetanus risk in disaster settings, where disrupted infrastructure, greater likelihood of contaminated wounds, and preexisting disparities in vaccination coverage compound vulnerability. A clearer understanding of these factors is essential for strengthening public health preparedness and ensuring equitable protection against tetanus, especially for populations disproportionately affected by disasters.

7 February 2026

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

XFacebookLinkedIn
Medicina - ISSN 1648-9144