Surgeries

Background/Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an accessible and low-cost diagnostic tool that is seldom used by orthopedic residents. This study aims to assess the efficacy of a POCUS training program within an orthopedic surgery residency curriculum in terms of knowledge retention and clinical usage among the group of residents. Methods: This study included didactic and hands-on teaching sessions. The impact of the teaching sessions was evaluated through surveys (pre-course, immediate post-course, and 6 months post-course). The surveys were divided into three sections: participant’s interest in and usage of POCUS, ultrasound-related knowledge, and perceived limitations related to the usage of ultrasound. All orthopedic residents who attended the teaching sessions and completed all the surveys were included. Results: There were 14 participants. There was a significant increase in interest in POCUS (scale 1 to 5) from 3.36 ± 0.50 in the pre-course survey to 3.93 ± 0.83 in the final post-course survey (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant change in the amount of POCUS usage in clinical settings. Levels of comfort with ultrasound-related procedures significantly increased immediately following the teaching session but did not stay significantly higher after 6 months. When tested on knowledge, the residents’ scores were still significantly greater than they were at the time of the pre-course test at 6 months (p = 0.01). Lack of ultrasound-related knowledge, lack of time, and site culture were the two most prevalent perceived barriers. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that POCUS teaching for orthopedic residents yields long-term benefits in terms of interest and knowledge. However, recurrent teaching sessions and further efforts are required to address perceived obstacles to PoCUS usage and increase clinical implementation.

Background/Objectives: Prepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction is widely used, but implant rippling often necessitates lipofilling. This study aimed to identify preoperative and perioperative factors associated with delayed lipofilling. Methods: A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction (April 2023–September 2024) was analyzed. Demographic data, BMI, smoking, comorbidities, oncologic treatments, surgical factors, and tumor location were recorded. Patients were divided according to whether delayed lipofilling was required. Univariate analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U and Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Fifty-eight patients were included; approximately one-third required lipofilling. Patients who underwent lipofilling were younger and had lower BMI than those who did not. Tumor location was strongly associated with the outcome: upper inner quadrant tumors were consistently linked to delayed lipofilling, whereas upper outer quadrant tumors were more frequently observed in the group not requiring revision. Smoking history and planned radiotherapy showed nonsignificant trends toward higher lipofilling rates. No differences were found for diabetes or corticosteroid therapy. Conclusions: Younger age, low BMI, and tumor location, particularly in the upper inner quadrant, were key factors associated with delayed lipofilling after prepectoral reconstruction. These variables may support preoperative counseling and follow-up planning to better anticipate secondary procedures and optimize aesthetic outcomes.

Background and objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective pain control is vital for early mobilization and reducing opioid use. While femoral nerve block (FNB) and adductor canal block (ACB) are common, they can cause motor weakness and incomplete analgesia. The genicular nerve block (GNB), typically used for chronic knee pain and arthroplasty, may offer a motor-sparing alternative for ACLR pain management. This review evaluates the evidence on GNB’s effectiveness for pain control, opioid reduction, and recovery after ACLR. Materials and Methods: A literature search (January 2014–May 2025) identified five studies involving adult ACLR patients receiving GNB. Data on demographics, techniques, pain scores, opioid use, and complications were analyzed. Results: Among 115 patients, GNB provided effective analgesia and reduced opioid needs. Randomized trials showed GNB was comparable to ACB and more effective when combined. Ultrasound, especially with Doppler, enhances precision and safety. No major motor deficits or adverse events were noted. Landmark-based approaches also showed utility in low-resource settings. Conclusions: GNB is a promising, motor-sparing option for postoperative pain in ACLR. Further high-quality trials are needed to confirm the benefits and standardize its use. The findings should be interpreted with caution, as the current evidence is of limited quality and lacks generalizability.