Surgeries

Introduction: Chest drainage is central to thoracic surgery, pleural medicine, and emergency care, yet practice remains heterogeneous in tube caliber, access, suction, device selection, and removal thresholds. This narrative review aims to synthesize evidence and translate it into guidance. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative review with PRISMA-modeled transparency. Using backward citation from recent comprehensive overviews, we included randomized trials, meta-analyses, guidelines/consensus statements, and high-quality observational studies. We extracted data on indications, technique, tube size, analog versus digital drainage, suction versus water-seal drainage, removal criteria, and key pleural conditions. Due to heterogeneity in device generations, suction targets, and outcomes, we synthesized the findings qualitatively according to converged evidence. Results: After lung resection, single-drain strategies, early use of water-seal, and standardized removal at ≤300–500 mL/day reduce pain and length of stay without increasing the need for reintervention; digital systems support objective removal using sustained low-flow thresholds (approximately 20–40 mL/min). Small-bore (≤14 Fr) Seldinger catheters perform comparably to larger tubes for secondary and primary pneumothorax and enable ambulatory pathways. In trauma, small-bore approaches can match large-bore drainage in stable patients when paired with surveillance and early escalation of care. For pleural infection, image-guided drainage, combined with fibrinolytics or surgery, is key. Indwelling pleural catheters provide relief comparable to talc in dyspnea associated with malignant effusions in patients with non-expandable lungs. Complications are mitigated by ultrasound guidance and avoiding abrupt high suction after chronic collapse; however, these strategies must be balanced against risks of malposition, occlusion or retained collections, prolonged air leaks, and device complexity, which demand protocolized escalation and team training. Conclusions: Practice coalesces around three pillars—right tube, right system, proper criteria. Adopt standardized pathways, device-agnostic thresholds, and volume or airflow criteria. Trials should harmonize “seal” definitions and validate telemetry-informed removal strategies.

The study reports a diagnostic challenge involving an inflammatory lesion mimicking a brown tumor. A 23-year-old male patient was referred for treatment of a cystic lesion in the left frontal process of the maxilla and ethmoid region. The leading symptoms were hemoptysis and chronic sinus inflammation. Endoscopic surgery was performed under general anesthesia, including curettage and drainage of the lesion into the middle nasal meatus. Histopathological examination revealed chronic inflammatory and fibrotic changes with hemosiderin deposits and CD68(+) histiocytes, findings that could suggest a brown tumor. However, subsequent laboratory investigations excluded this diagnosis. Postoperative healing was uneventful, with complete resolution of symptoms. This report highlights the importance of distinguishing inflammatory from metabolic bone lesions in the paranasal sinuses and underscores the critical role of histopathological evaluation in differentiating true neoplasms from inflammatory pseudotumors.

Background/Objectives: Adipose tissue (AT) plays significant roles in energy storage, metabolite signaling, and immunomodulation. The understanding of its underlying mechanisms of dysregulation can provide insight into complex disease processes through analysis with histology, flow cytometry, metabolomics, and proteomics. Tissue sampling in the clinical setting has largely shifted towards minimally invasive approaches to improve factors such as patient satisfaction, post-operative recovery, and procedure length. In contrast, preclinical animal models continue to rely on more invasive methods until refined, minimally invasive techniques are developed and systematically assessed. To improve animal welfare and enhance clinical translatability, there is a critical need to reverse translate these approaches into animal models. Methods: Our study evaluated the feasibility and performance of a commercially available vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) device for AT sampling in a preclinical nonhuman primate (NHP) model. Six rhesus NHPs successfully underwent three serial AT biopsies with a VAB device (n = 18). Results: All animals recovered without any serious or unexpected adverse events. The amount of adipose tissue collected per biopsy (0.5–2.7 g) was proportional to the number of individual tracks. Isolation of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) from a subset of samples (n = 6) yielded 0.41 ± 0.12 × 10⁶ cells/g of tissue. Conclusions: The minimally invasive VAB technique is a safe and reliable method of AT collection in NHPs. This feasibility study demonstrated adequate volumes of tissue cores that are suitable for typical, downstream research applications including immunologic studies and pathology, while improving animal welfare.