Nursing Reports

Background: Nurses have unique insights into health systems yet remain underrepresented in policy processes. Strengthening political competence is widely regarded as important for evidence-informed nursing leadership. Objectives: To assess self-perceived political competence and policy participation among nurses and nursing students in Croatia. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey using open, non-probability recruitment. Of 447 individuals who opened the survey link, 440 provided responses and 390 completed all 19 competence items measuring political competence across three domains (attitudes, knowledge/evidence, and skills). Open recruitment precluded calculation of a conventional response rate. A 19-item self-report questionnaire measured political competence across three domains (attitudes, knowledge/evidence and skills); internal consistency was α = 0.91, although the Croatian version has not been fully validated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, binomial tests and ordinal logistic regression on the complete-case sample. Results: Most respondents endorsed nurses’ policy involvement, the importance of scientific evidence and nursing’s holistic perspective. Conclusions: Nurses and nursing students reported strong conceptual support for a policy role but only moderate confidence in influencing policy. These cross-sectional findings highlight a gap between conceptual support and personal confidence that may be addressable through structured educational and institutional support; the impact of such initiatives on policy influence should be examined in future longitudinal or interventional studies.

Climate change poses a major global health threat, with healthcare systems contributing substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions. Health professionals and students play an essential role in advancing sustainable practice, yet many lack the knowledge, skills, and confidence needed to address the environmental impacts of healthcare. This study aims to co-design and evaluate a gamified e-resource that enhances pre-registration health profession students’ knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes towards healthcare decarbonisation, while encouraging sustainable behaviour change. A sequential explanatory design will be employed in three phases: (1) a scoping review of the literature; (2) four co-design workshops with students (n = 20) followed by post-workshop focus groups using focused ethnography to explore co-design experiences; and (3) pre- and post-test questionnaires (n = 200) assessing knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, behaviours, willingness to act, and usability, followed by focus groups (n = 30) exploring behavioural changes after using the e-resource. The study will generate evidence on how a co-designed, gamified e-resources influence student learning and engagement with healthcare decarbonisation. Findings will inform the integration of sustainability and decarbonisation principles within education and support efforts to equip future health professionals with the competencies required for a low-carbon healthcare system.

Background/Objectives: Structural empowerment involves access to opportunities, information, support, and resources within the work environment. These elements are crucial as they foster nurses’ professional growth and autonomy. Given their significance, understanding hospital nurses’ perceptions of structural empowerment is important. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore hospital nurses’ perceptions of their levels of structural empowerment. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 684 nurses from a Portuguese hospital, conducted between November 2024 and January 2025. The questionnaire collected demographic data and employed the Conditions of Work Effectiveness Questionnaire II. Results: The mean total score for structural empowerment was 18.74 (SD = 3.46), with significant differences found between nurses and specialist nurses, for those with the specialist title (p = 0.0477) and within the professional category (p = 0.0058), as well as between nurses working day shifts and those working day and night shifts (p < 0.0001). Additional significant differences were observed between nurses from the Medicine department (median [Q1–Q3]: 19.25 [17.00–21.50]) and those from the Surgery department (18.17 [16.00–20.25], p = 0.0104), as well as between Generation Z nurses (19.58 [17.33–21.83]) and Generation Y nurses (18.29 [16.25–20.33], p = 0.0018). Conclusions: These results underscore the importance of consistently promoting structural empowerment across the nursing staff, addressing disparities between groups, and improving both professional development and quality of patient care.