Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
6.4
3.2
Journals
Materials
Special Issues
Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation
materials-logo
Submit to Materials Review for Materials Propose a Special Issue

Journal Menu

► Journal Menu

Journal Browser

► Journal Browser
share announcement

Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation

A special issue of Materials (ISSN 1996-1944). This special issue belongs to the section "Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 May 2025) | Viewed by 5235

Special Issue Editors

Dr. João Paulo Mendes Tribst

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Dental Materials, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Interests: dental implants; dental prosthodontics; finite element analysis; biomechanics; bond strength; fatigue; partial restorations; intraradicular retainer; prosthetic dentistry; fixed and removable prosthodontics; aesthetic dentistry; oral rehabilitation; digital dentistry; CAD/CAM technology; implant-supported dentures; full mouth rehabilitation; occlusion and bite analysis; dental materials for prosthodontics; denture design and fabrication; implant prosthodontics; prosthetic complications and management; maxillofacial prosthetics; prosthodontic treatment planning; prosthodontic maintenance and longevity; dental crowns and bridges; restorative dentistry
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Prof. Dr. Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Prosthodontics Unit, Department of Restorative Dentistry and Post-Graduate Program in Oral Sciences, Faculty of Odontology, Federal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Av., T Street, Building 26F, Santa Maria, Brazil
Interests: prosthodontics; fixed and removable prosthodontics; oral rehabilitation; restorative dentistry; prosthodontic treatment planning; prosthodontic maintenance and longevity; aesthetic dentistry; digital dentistry; CAD/CAM technology; implant-supported prosthetics; full mouth rehabilitation; dental implants; crowns and bridges; denture design and fabrication; prosthetic complications and management; occlusion and bite analysis; dental materials for prosthodontics; biomechanics; bond strength; fatigue
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco

E-Mail
Guest Editor Assistant
Prosthodontics Unit, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Ramiro Barcelos Street, 2492, Acess Gate K, Santa Cecília, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Interests: prosthodontics; fixed and removable prosthodontics; oral rehabilitation; restorative dentistry; prosthodontic treatment planning; prosthodontic maintenance and longevity; aesthetic dentistry; digital dentistry; CAD/CAM technology; implant-supported prosthetics; full mouth rehabilitation; dental implants; crowns and bridges; denture design and fabrication; prosthetic complications and management; occlusion and bite analysis; dental materials for prosthodontics; biomechanics; bond strength; fatigue
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue, titled "Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation", will explore the latest innovations and developments in dental materials that are crucial for enhancing oral rehabilitation practices. Our goal is to bring together cutting-edge research that focuses on the design, synthesis, and application of novel materials that improve both the functional and aesthetic outcomes of dental restorations and prosthetics. We seek to address significant challenges in oral rehabilitation, such as the durability of materials under mechanical stress, biocompatibility with oral tissues, and the seamless integration of materials with biological tissues. Contributions will delve into advanced dental materials, including high-strength ceramics, polymer composites, bioactive glasses, and smart materials that respond to environmental stimuli. Research on innovative bonding agents and surface treatments that enhance the adhesion and longevity of dental restorations is also highly encouraged. This Special Issue will highlight interdisciplinary approaches that combine insights from materials science, biomedical engineering, and clinical dentistry. We aim to develop materials that not only meet the necessary mechanical and aesthetic requirements but also promote tissue regeneration and minimize adverse reactions.

You may choose our Joint Special Issue in Oral.

Dr. João Paulo Mendes Tribst
Prof. Dr. Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira
Guest Editors

Dr. Rafaela Oliveira Pilecco
Guest Editor Assistant

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Materials is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • biomaterials
  • dental materials
  • dental implants
  • polymers
  • ceramics
  • nanotechnology
  • smart materials
  • 3D printing
  • sustainable materials
  • eco-friendly materials

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

18 pages, 3977 KiB  
Article
Comparison of the Performance Parameters of BioHPP® and Biocetal® Used in the Production of Prosthetic Restorations in Dentistry—Part I: Mechanical Tests: An In Vitro Study
by Robert Kowalski, Wojciech Frąckiewicz, Magdalena Kwiatkowska, Małgorzata Światłowska-Bajzert and Ewa Sobolewska
Materials 2025, 18(3), 561; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030561 - 26 Jan 2025
Viewed by 879
Abstract
The aim of these in vitro studies was to determine and compare the mechanical and tribological performance of two commercially available thermoplastic materials, namely BioHPP and Biocetal, used in dental prosthetics. In order to perform the comparative tests of both materials, the dog-bone [...] Read more.
The aim of these in vitro studies was to determine and compare the mechanical and tribological performance of two commercially available thermoplastic materials, namely BioHPP and Biocetal, used in dental prosthetics. In order to perform the comparative tests of both materials, the dog-bone shaped samples were formed by an injection molding process as in standard polymer materials research, wherein Biocetal samples constituted the research group, and BioHPP samples served as a control group. In the presented studies, their mechanical parameters were reported and analyzed: namely, Shore’s hardness, unnotched impact strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, as well as abrasive wear resistance, obtained within appropriate tribological and mechanical tests. The Shapiro–Wilk test, Q–Q plot analysis, Grubbs test and Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) were used to statistically evaluate the results. The experimental results revealed that BioHPP material is characterized by higher hardness, impact strength, bending strength, and also lower “wet” abrasion wear if compared to Biocetal performance. However, it is subject to higher abrasive wear under “dry” conditions and reveals higher stiffness as well as lower ability to deform, which could affect a patient’s comfort during application. BioHPP, despite being a high-performance polymer material, also has some drawbacks that may affect the poorer long-term use of dentures in people producing less saliva. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 14117 KiB  
Article
Comparison of the Performance Parameters of BioHPP® and Biocetal® Used in the Production of Prosthetic Restorations in Dentistry—Part II: Physicochemical and Microbiological Tests: An In Vitro Study
by Robert Kowalski, Wojciech Frąckiewicz, Magdalena Kwiatkowska, Marcin Adamiak, Agata Pruss and Ewa Sobolewska
Materials 2025, 18(3), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18030519 - 23 Jan 2025
Viewed by 2628
Abstract
The natural aging process of the human organism leads to both physiological and pathological changes, including tooth loss. This requires dental prosthetic interventions aimed at restoring patients’ quality of life. The use of such prostheses necessitates selection of sufficiently strong, aesthetic and biocompatible [...] Read more.
The natural aging process of the human organism leads to both physiological and pathological changes, including tooth loss. This requires dental prosthetic interventions aimed at restoring patients’ quality of life. The use of such prostheses necessitates selection of sufficiently strong, aesthetic and biocompatible materials, which also offer ease of shaping. The market for materials used in prosthetic applications offers a wide array of options; however, selection of the most suitable material for specific clinical scenarios can be challenging for dental professionals. This paper continues the comprehensive investigation of the physiochemical and mechanical/functional properties of two commonly used prosthetic—Biocetal and BioHPP—offering a comparative analysis of their characteristics to provide valuable insights for dentists and prosthodontists. The study focuses on in vitro analyses of physiochemical parameters, including density, water sorption, contact angle, and surface roughness. The structure of the materials was examined via scanning electron microscopy. Additionally, microbiological studies were performed using strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans. Statistical analysis was performed using Shapiro–Wilk test, Q-Q plot analysis, Grubbs test, and Student’s T-test (p < 0.05). The findings indicate that BioHPP demonstrates superior physiochemical and microbiological properties. However, Biocetal exhibit better surface characteristics. Despite its high performance, BioHPP presents certain drawbacks, which may influence dentists’ material choice in specific clinical cases, particularly for certain prosthetic restorations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

25 pages, 1448 KiB  
Review
From Salivary Dysfunction to Prosthetic Challenges in Xerostomia and Denture Retention with Oral Gels
by Dawid Łysik, Joanna Niewęgłowska and Joanna Mystkowska
Materials 2025, 18(13), 3141; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18133141 - 2 Jul 2025
Abstract
Xerostomia significantly compromises oral comfort, mucosal integrity, and denture retention. While topical therapies such as oral gels are commonly used to manage symptoms, their effectiveness remains limited due to an inability to replicate the complex biochemical and mechanical functions of natural saliva. This [...] Read more.
Xerostomia significantly compromises oral comfort, mucosal integrity, and denture retention. While topical therapies such as oral gels are commonly used to manage symptoms, their effectiveness remains limited due to an inability to replicate the complex biochemical and mechanical functions of natural saliva. This review explores the pathophysiology of salivary dysfunction, the structural and functional roles of mucins, and the tribological and rheological demands of the oral environment—particularly in denture wearers. Emphasis is placed on the interplay between mucosal surfaces, salivary films, and prosthetic biomaterials, as well as the importance of mucoadhesion and aqueous boundary lubrication. A rheological comparison of commercially available oral gels and whole human saliva (WHS) reveals that gels are significantly more viscous and elastic, yet fail to mimic the dynamic responsiveness of saliva. Current formulations lack functional standardization and labeling, limiting clinical guidance. The study proposes design principles for next-generation gels that incorporate amphiphilic, biomimetic components and measurable performance benchmarks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 786 KiB  
Review
Implant Surface Decontamination Methods That Can Impact Implant Wettability
by Georgios E. Romanos, Lauren Mistretta, Allyson Newman, Danielle Ohana and Rafael A. Delgado-Ruiz
Materials 2024, 17(24), 6249; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17246249 - 20 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1289
Abstract
This review addresses the effects of various decontamination methods on the wettability of titanium and zirconia dental implants. Despite extensive research on surface wettability, there is still a significant gap in understanding how different decontamination techniques impact the inherent wettability of these surfaces. [...] Read more.
This review addresses the effects of various decontamination methods on the wettability of titanium and zirconia dental implants. Despite extensive research on surface wettability, there is still a significant gap in understanding how different decontamination techniques impact the inherent wettability of these surfaces. Although the literature presents inconsistent findings on the efficacy of decontamination methods such as lasers, air-polishing, UV light, and chemical treatments, the reviewed studies suggest that decontamination alters in vitro hydrophilicity. Post-decontamination surface chemistry must be carefully considered when selecting optimal surface treatments for implant materials. Further in vitro investigations are essential to determine which approaches best enhance surface wettability, potentially leading to improved implant–tissue interactions in clinical settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Dental Materials for Oral Rehabilitation)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-4
Back to TopTop