Musculoskeletal Imaging: Innovations in Diagnostics and Interventional Therapies

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Research".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 776

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Musculoskeletal imaging is a broad field within radiology, and is its truly oldest branch. Interestingly, the invention of radiology (via the use of X-rays) and the birth of musculoskeletal imaging coincide. Indeed, the first radiograph was the well-known hand X-ray taken in 1895 by Roentgen.

Since that time, continuous improvements in technological equipment and medical knowledge have dramatically altered and constantly advanced the field. Cross-sectional imaging was the first revolution in the history of radiology and, presently, quantitative imaging tools are increasing the importance and clinical accuracy of diagnostic radiology.

Interventional radiology is also gaining a great deal of relevance in the field of musculoskeletal imaging and many minimally invasive image-guided treatments are replacing traditional surgical procedures in the current clinical practice of musculoskeletal disorders.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide a series of high-quality papers written by experts in the field of musculoskeletal imaging; both diagnostic and interventional studies are welcome. Our aim is to deepen understanding of the latest trends and to also advance the fundamental level of knowledge in the field.

Dr. Paolo Spinnato
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • bone and bones
  • computed tomography
  • sarcoma
  • interventional radiology

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 31371 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound Phenotype-Based Approach to Treatment Choice in Osteoarthritis
by Rositsa Karalilova, Velichka Popova, Konstantin Batalov, Dimitar Kolev, Lyatif Kodzhaahmed, Dimitrina Petrova-Stoyankova, Nikola Tepeliev, Tsvetelina Kostova, Lili Mekenyan and Zguro Batalov
Life 2025, 15(7), 1140; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15071140 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 242
Abstract
Introduction/Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic systemic disease that affects the entire array of joint structures. It is one of the most common chronic, socially significant diseases, associated with a decline in the quality of life of patients and constantly increasing the cost [...] Read more.
Introduction/Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic systemic disease that affects the entire array of joint structures. It is one of the most common chronic, socially significant diseases, associated with a decline in the quality of life of patients and constantly increasing the cost of treatment. Clinical trial outcomes are largely inconclusive, and OA remains one of the few musculoskeletal diseases without an established disease-modifying therapy. One potential explanation is the use of ineffective tools for OA classification, patient stratification, and the assessment of disease progression. There is growing interest in musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSK US), as it enables the dynamic visualization of the examined structures and gives information about both inflammatory and structural changes that have occurred. Determining the leading ultrasound phenotype, which depends on the most damaged tissue at a given time (bone, cartilage, synovial membrane, joint capsule, ligaments, tendons, menisci, etc.), can rationalize therapy use by selecting patients more suitable for specific treatments. This article aims to evaluate and summarize the potential of MSK US in the process of determining the clinical phenotype of OA and to emphasize the importance of this imaging modality in evaluating further therapeutic strategies. Method: A single-center prospective study conducted in the period of September 2023–June 2024 enrolled 259 consecutive patients with proven OA. The statistical program Minitab version 22.2.1 (2025) was used to analyze the data. The predominant and secondary phenotypes were tabulated for each OA localization and were presented numerically and as relative proportions (%). The rate of the most frequently occurring phenotypes was compared against that of the less frequent ones through paired z-tests. The initially acceptable type I error was set at 5%; it was further adjusted for the number of comparisons (Bonferroni). Results: The most frequent and predominant US phenotype for patients with knee OA was intra-articular effusion (n = 47, 37.90%). It was significantly higher compared to the rest of the US phenotypes: synovial proliferation (n = 22, 17.70%; p < 0.001), cartilage destruction (n = 26, 21%; p = 0.001), altered subchondral bone (n = 8, 6.50%; p < 0.001), extra-articular soft tissue changes (n = 12, 9.70%; p < 0.001), crystal deposits (n = 6, 4.8%; p < 0.001), and post-traumatic (n = 3, 2.40%; p < 0.001). The most common US phenotype for hip OA was altered subchondral bone (n = 32, 47.1%), with significant differences from intra-articular effusion (n = 12, 17.60%; p = 0.001), synovial proliferation (n = 5, 7.40; p = 0.001), cartilage destruction (n = 12, 17.60%; p = 0.001), extra-articular soft tissue changes (n = 3, 4.40%; p = 0.001), crystal deposits (n = 3, 4.40%; p = 0.001), and post-traumatic (n = 0). Altered subchondral bone was also the leading US phenotype for hand OA (n = 31, 55.40%), with significant differences compared to intra-articular effusion (n = 1, 1.80%; p < 0.001), synovial proliferation (n = 7, 12.50%; p < 0.001), cartilage destruction (n = 11, 19.60%; p < 0.001), extra-articular soft tissue changes (n = 2, 3.60%; p < 0.001), crystal deposits (n = 3, 5.40%; p < 0.001), and post-traumatic (n = 1, 1.80%, p < 0.001). For shoulder OA, extra-articular soft tissue changes were the most frequent (n = 8, 46.20%), followed by post-traumatic (n = 4, 30.70%), as the rate of both phenotypes was significantly higher compared to that of intra-articular effusion (n = 0), synovial proliferation (n = 0), cartilage destruction (n = 1, 7.70%; p = 0.003), and crystal deposits (n = 0). Conclusions: The therapeutic approach for OA is a dynamic and intricate process, for which the type of affected joint and the underlying pathogenetic mechanism at a specific stage of the disease’s evolution is essential. MSK US is one of the options for the clinical phenotyping of OA. Some of the suggested ultrasound subtypes may serve as the rationale for selecting a particular treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3705 KiB  
Article
Triangular Fibrocartilage Characterization with Ultrashort Echo Time-T2* MRI: Insights from a Healthy Cohort
by Sana Boudabbous, Hicham Bouredoucen, David Ferreira Branco, Stefan Sommer, Tom Hilbert, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Rares Salomir and Bénédicte Marie Anne Delattre
Life 2025, 15(7), 1117; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15071117 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 240
Abstract
The objective of this study is to measure T2* relaxation time in the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) disc in asymptomatic volunteers and evaluate its variation with factors such as age, hand dominance, sex, and ulnar variance, using a dedicated MRI sequence. The MRI protocol [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to measure T2* relaxation time in the triangular fibrocartilage (TFC) disc in asymptomatic volunteers and evaluate its variation with factors such as age, hand dominance, sex, and ulnar variance, using a dedicated MRI sequence. The MRI protocol included anatomical sequences as well as a 3D ultra-short echo time (UTE)-T2* mapping sequence. A linear regression model was used to assess the potential influence of age, sex, and hand dominance on T2* values measured in the TFC disc and to evaluate the correlation between T2* values and ulnar variance. T2* relaxation time was positively correlated with age. The higher T2* relaxation times may reflect early degeneration of the fibrocartilage microstructure, which is associated with both biomechanical factors and the aging process. However, T2* was not significantly influenced by sex or hand dominance, nor was it correlated with ulnar variance (this later being limited by the fact that none of our subject had positive ulnar variance). In conclusion, UTE-T2* is a promising MRI technique showing positive correlation with age in the TFC of healthy subjects. These findings are a first step to establish normative T2* values and will help interpreting deviations observed in patient with suspected pathology in future studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop