Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Diverse Educational Contexts

A special issue of Journal of Intelligence (ISSN 2079-3200). This special issue belongs to the section "Studies on Cognitive Processes".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2026 | Viewed by 2121

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Graduate Studies & Faculty of Education, Oranim College, Tivon 3600600, Israel
Interests: science education; STEM education; gifted education; self-regulation; metacognition; assessment; teachers’ professional development; innovative learning environments
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Science and Technology Education Program, Faculty of Education, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel
Interests: eductaion; cooperative learning; metacognitive training

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Education Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Hungary
Interests: psychology of learning; metacognition; psychobiography

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a call for papers for a Special Issue of Journal of Intelligence focused focusing on metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) across diverse educational contexts. This issue aims to bring together high-quality empirical and theoretical contributions that examine how these essential cognitive and regulatory processes develop and are supported among a wide range of learners and educators, including students at any level of education, pre-service teachers, in-service teachers, and academic lecturers. The issue also welcomes studies that focus on diverse populations (e.g., gifted students, twice-exceptional (2E) learners, students with learning disabilities) recognizing the value of understanding SRL and metacognition across varied cognitive profiles.

As the educational landscape evolves, the ability to reflect, monitor, and manage one’s learning is critical for both learners and educators. These processes are increasingly influenced by the learning environments, both technological (e.g., AI, VR/AR) and physical (e.g., flexible, hybrid spaces) that support metacognitive development and self-regulation.

This Special Issue encourages interdisciplinary perspectives, including contributions from education, psychology, neuroscience, learning sciences, and educational technology, to deepen our understanding of metacognition and SRL across contexts and populations.

Topics of interest include the following:

  • Development and assessment of metacognition and SRL in students at all educational levels;
  • Metacognitive processes and SRL in higher education students;
  • Metacognition and self-regulation among pre-service and in-service teachers;
  • Metacognitive processes and SRL processes among diverse populations;
  • Neuroscientific insights into Metacognition and SRL: executive function, brain mechanisms, and implications for teaching;
  • Impact of technology-enhanced learning environments (e.g., VR, AI) on metacognitive and self-regulatory processes;
  • Influence of physical and hybrid learning environments on Metacognition and SRL;
  • Instructional design, assessment methods, and interventions that support SRL across educational levels and populations.

Dr. Shirley Miedijensky
Prof. Zmira Mevarech
Dr. Ágnes Bálint
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Intelligence is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • metacognition
  • self-regulated learning
  • gifted education
  • diverse learners
  • primary education
  • secondary education
  • higher education
  • pre-service teachers
  • in-service teachers
  • neuroscience of learning
  • educational technology
  • virtual reality
  • artificial intelligence
  • learning environments
  • cognitive and emotional regulation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

28 pages, 3611 KB  
Article
The Meta-Intelligent Child: Validating the MKIT as a Tool to Develop Metacognitive Knowledge in Early Childhood
by Onciu Oana and Prisacaru Flavia
J. Intell. 2025, 13(11), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13110149 - 17 Nov 2025
Viewed by 626
Abstract
This article presents and validates the Metacognitive Knowledge Intervention for Thinking (MKIT)—an educational framework designed to assess and develop domain-general metacognitive knowledge (MK) in children aged 5 to 9. Moving beyond traditional approaches that examine metacognition within isolated subject areas, this research reconceptualizes [...] Read more.
This article presents and validates the Metacognitive Knowledge Intervention for Thinking (MKIT)—an educational framework designed to assess and develop domain-general metacognitive knowledge (MK) in children aged 5 to 9. Moving beyond traditional approaches that examine metacognition within isolated subject areas, this research reconceptualizes MK as a transferable learning resource across content domains and developmental stages. Moreover, by employing a stepped-wedge design—a rigorous but rarely used approach in education—the study introduces a methodological advancement. Simultaneously, MK is operationalized through an ecologically valid and developmentally appropriate format, using visually engaging stories, illustrated scenarios, and interactive tasks integrated within classroom routines. These adaptations enabled young learners to engage meaningfully with abstract metacognitive concepts. Therefore, across three interconnected studies (N = 458), the MKIT provided strong psychometric evidence supporting valid inferences about metacognitive knowledge, age-invariant effects, and substantial gains among children with initially low MK levels. In addition, qualitative data indicated MK transfer across contexts. Thus, these findings position MKIT as a scalable tool, supported by multiple strands of validity evidence, that makes metacognitive knowledge teachable across domains—offering a practical approach to strengthening learning, reducing early achievement gaps, and supporting the development of core components of intelligence. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 2445 KB  
Systematic Review
From Practice to Reflection: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms Driving Metacognition and SRL in Music
by Yinghui Wang, Mengqi Zhang, Huasen Zhang, Xin Shan and Xiaofei Du
J. Intell. 2025, 13(12), 162; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13120162 - 9 Dec 2025
Viewed by 559
Abstract
Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) are widely recognized as key mechanisms for academic achievement and skill development, yet in music education they have rarely been examined through explicit instructional interventions to enable causal testing and effect evaluation. To address this gap, this study [...] Read more.
Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) are widely recognized as key mechanisms for academic achievement and skill development, yet in music education they have rarely been examined through explicit instructional interventions to enable causal testing and effect evaluation. To address this gap, this study followed PRISMA guidelines and conducted a systematic review of 31 studies (including seven for meta-analysis) to identify intervention types and mechanisms, and to quantify their overall effects and moderating factors. Results indicate the following: (1) the intervention ecology is grounded in structured learning support (SLS), frequently combined with strategy teaching (ST) or technology-enhanced interventions (TEI), with full integration concentrated at the university level. (2) The mechanisms operate primarily along four pathways: structure facilitates a “plan–practice–reflection” loop, strategy instruction makes tacit experience explicit, technological feedback provides a third-person perspective, and teacher support stabilizes motivation. (3) The meta-analysis revealed a significant positive medium effect overall. (4) Intervention structure moderated outcomes, though not as a single or stable determinant. (5) Effects followed a U-shaped pattern across educational stages, strongest in secondary school, followed by university, and weaker in preschool and primary. Future research should employ proximal, task-aligned measures, conduct parallel multi-indicator assessments within the same stage, and expand evidence for multi-mechanism integration in primary and secondary school contexts. Experimental designs manipulating levels of SLS are needed to test whether ST + TEI remain effective under low-structure conditions, thereby identifying the minimum structural threshold. Extending samples to informal and professional music learners would further enhance robustness and generalizability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop