Challenges in the Management of Blood Diseases during COVID-19 Pandemic

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Hematology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 January 2023) | Viewed by 28356

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail
Guest Editor
Department of General Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi, Japan
Interests: thrombosis; bleeding; hypercoagulability; clot waveform; platelet; coagulation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which sometimes causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), coagulopathy, and poor outcomes, has now spread worldwide. However, this does not mean that we can afford to discontinue the management of blood diseases.

In this Special Issue, we will focus on the management of blood disease during COVID-19 and would like to examine the effect of COVID-19 on blood diseases (with and without modification of frequency, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatments).

The virus that causes COVID-19 first emerged in China in December 2019, but COVID-19 infections spread worldwide rapidly, with the disease being declared a pandemic in less than a few months by the WHO. Various reports suggest that one of the potential symptoms of COVID-19 is the presence of coagulopathy.

New mechanisms of associated, affected, or modified blood diseases with COVID-19 will be investigated in this Special Issue.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, new, modified, or constant management for various blood diseases will be required, including not just COVID-19-associated blood disease but also the blood diseases that existed before the pandemic. We look forward to receiving your articles on these topics.

Dr. Hideo Wada
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • coagulopathy
  • blood diseases
  • modified management
  • pathophysiology

Published Papers (13 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Other

2 pages, 473 KiB  
Editorial
Biomarkers of Hypercoagulability in COVID-19
by Hideo Wada
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3525; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103525 - 17 May 2023
Viewed by 925
Abstract
This issue focuses on the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [...] Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Other

15 pages, 666 KiB  
Article
Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Caregiving and Related Resource Needs
by Diliara Bagautdinova, Kelsey C. Bacharz, Carma L. Bylund, Maria Sae-Hau, Elisa S. Weiss, Michelle Rajotte, Greg Lincoln, Taylor S. Vasquez, Naomi D. Parker, Kevin B. Wright and Carla L. Fisher
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1648; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041648 - 18 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2252
Abstract
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) caregivers play a central role in disease management—a role that has been heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic given the healthcare system’s reliance on frontline family caregivers and CLL patients’ increased risk of infection and mortality. Using a mixed-method design, [...] Read more.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) caregivers play a central role in disease management—a role that has been heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic given the healthcare system’s reliance on frontline family caregivers and CLL patients’ increased risk of infection and mortality. Using a mixed-method design, we investigated the impact of the pandemic on CLL caregivers (Aim 1) and their perceived resource needs (Aim 2): 575 CLL caregivers responded to an online survey; 12 spousal CLL caregivers were interviewed. Two open-ended survey items were thematically analyzed and compared with interview findings. Aim 1 results showed that two years into the pandemic, CLL caregivers continue to struggle with coping with distress, living in isolation, and losing in-person care opportunities. Caregivers described experiencing increasing caregiving burden, realizing the vaccine may not work or didn’t work for their loved one with CLL, feeling cautiously hopeful about EVUSHELD, and dealing with unsupportive/skeptical individuals. Aim 2 results indicate that CLL caregivers needed reliable, ongoing information about COVID-19 risk, information about and access to vaccination, safety/precautionary measures, and monoclonal infusions. Findings illustrate ongoing challenges facing CLL caregivers and provide an agenda to better support the caregivers of this vulnerable population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1232 KiB  
Article
Global Hemostasis Potential in COVID-19 Positive Patients Performed on St-Genesia Show Hypercoagulable State
by Beverly Buffart, Anne Demulder, Marco Fangazio and Laurence Rozen
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(24), 7255; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247255 - 07 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1092
Abstract
Background: At the dawn of the pandemic, severe forms of COVID-19 were often complicated by thromboembolisms. However, routine laboratory tests cannot be used to predict thromboembolic events. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential value of the thrombin generation test [...] Read more.
Background: At the dawn of the pandemic, severe forms of COVID-19 were often complicated by thromboembolisms. However, routine laboratory tests cannot be used to predict thromboembolic events. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential value of the thrombin generation test (TGT) in predicting hypercoagulability and thrombotic risk in the aforementioned set of patients. Methods: The study panel comprised 52 patients divided into two groups (26 COVID-19 positive and 26 COVID-19 negative); COVID-19-positive patients were further grouped in “severe” (n = 11) and “non-severe” (n = 15) categories based on clinical criteria. The routine blood tests and TGT of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All 26 COVID-19-positive patients showed decreased lymphocyte, monocyte and basophil counts and increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine transaminase (ALT) compared with control patients. Conversely, we did not observe statistically significant differences between severe and non-severe patients despite anecdotal variations in the distribution patterns. TGT without thrombomodulin (TM) addition showed statistically significant differences in the thrombin peak heights between COVID-19-positive and negative patients. After addition of TM, peak height, Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) and velocity index were increased in all COVID-19-positive patients while the percentage of inhibition of ETP was reduced. These trends correlated with the severity of disease, showing a greater increase in peak height, ETP, velocity index and a drastic reduction in the percentage of ETP inhibition in more severely affected patients. Conclusions: Our data suggest that all COVID-19 patients harbor a hypercoagulable TGT profile and that this is further pronounced in severely affected patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 875 KiB  
Article
Predictive Value of Blood Coagulation Parameters in Poor Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study in Romania
by Cosmin Citu, Bogdan Burlea, Florin Gorun, Andrei Motoc, Oana Maria Gorun, Daniel Malita, Adrian Ratiu, Roxana Margan, Mirela Loredana Grigoras, Felix Bratosin and Ioana Mihaela Citu
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2831; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102831 - 17 May 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 1646
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection produces alterations in blood clotting, especially in severe cases of COVID-19. Abnormal coagulation parameters in patients with COVID-19 are important prognostic factors of disease severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of aPTT, D-dimer, INR and [...] Read more.
SARS-CoV-2 infection produces alterations in blood clotting, especially in severe cases of COVID-19. Abnormal coagulation parameters in patients with COVID-19 are important prognostic factors of disease severity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of aPTT, D-dimer, INR and PT in the mortality of patients with COVID-19. A retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted on COVID-19 patients admitted to the Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital in Timisoara, Romania, between August and October 2021. Patients were confirmed as COVID-19 positive by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, a total of 82 patients were included in the analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of D-Dimer, INR, PT and aPTT were generated to assess whether the baseline of each of these biomarkers was accurately predictive for mortality in patients with COVID-19. Mortality among patients enrolled in this study was 20.7%, associated with older age and presence of heart disease. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) of D-Dimer, INR, PT, and aPTT were 0.751, 0.724, 0.706 and 0.753. Differences in survival for patients with coagulation biomarker levels above cut-off values compared to patients below these values were statistically significant. All evaluated parameters had significant differences and good performance in predicting mortality of COVID-19 patients, except fibrinogen, which had no significant difference. Moreover, aPTT and D-dimer were the best performing parameters in predicting mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2117 KiB  
Article
Early Cellular and Humoral Responses Developed in Oncohematological Patients after Vaccination with One Dose against COVID-19
by Sara Rodríguez-Mora, Magdalena Corona, Montserrat Torres, Guiomar Casado-Fernández, Javier García-Pérez, Fernando Ramos-Martín, Lorena Vigón, Mario Manzanares, Elena Mateos, Fernando Martín-Moro, Alejandro Zurdo-Castronuño, María Aranzazu Murciano-Antón, José Alcamí, Mayte Pérez-Olmeda, Javier López-Jiménez, Valentín García-Gutiérrez, Mayte Coiras and on behalf of the Multidisciplinary Group of Study of COVID-19 (MGS-COVID)
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2803; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102803 - 16 May 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2223
Abstract
Individuals with oncohematological diseases (OHD) may develop an impaired immune response against vaccines due to the characteristics of the disease or to its treatment. Humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 has been described to be suboptimal in these patients, but the quality and efficiency of [...] Read more.
Individuals with oncohematological diseases (OHD) may develop an impaired immune response against vaccines due to the characteristics of the disease or to its treatment. Humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 has been described to be suboptimal in these patients, but the quality and efficiency of the cellular immune response has not been yet completely characterized. In this study, we analyzed the early humoral and cellular immune responses in individuals with different OHD after receiving one dose of an authorized vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Humoral response, determined by antibodies titers and neutralizing capacity, was overall impaired in individuals with OHD, except for the cohort of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), which showed higher levels of specific IgGs than healthy donors. Conversely, the specific direct cytotoxic cellular immunity response (DCC) against SARS-CoV-2, appeared to be enhanced, especially in individuals with CML and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This increased cellular immune response, developed earlier than in healthy donors, showed a modest cytotoxic activity that was compensated by significantly increased numbers, likely due to the disease or its treatment. The analysis of the immune response through subsequent vaccine doses will help establish the real efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in individuals with OHD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 10544 KiB  
Article
Elevated Plasma Soluble C-Type Lectin-like Receptor 2 Is Associated with the Worsening of Coronavirus Disease 2019
by Hideo Wada, Yuhuko Ichikawa, Minoru Ezaki, Akitaka Yamamoto, Masaki Tomida, Masamichi Yoshida, Shunsuke Fukui, Isao Moritani, Katsuya Shiraki, Motomu Shimaoka, Toshiaki Iba, Katsue Suzuki-Inoue and Hideto Shimpo
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(4), 985; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11040985 - 14 Feb 2022
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 1640
Abstract
Although thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has attracted attention, the mechanism underlying its development remains unclear. The relationship between platelet activation and the severity of COVID-19 infection was compared with that involving other infections. Plasma soluble C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) [...] Read more.
Although thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has attracted attention, the mechanism underlying its development remains unclear. The relationship between platelet activation and the severity of COVID-19 infection was compared with that involving other infections. Plasma soluble C-type lectin-like receptor 2 (sCLEC-2) levels were measured in 46 patients with COVID-19 infection and in 127 patients with other infections. The plasma sCLEC-2 levels in patients with COVID-19 infection {median (25th, 75th percentile), 489 (355, 668) ng/L} were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in comparison to patients suffering from other pneumonia {276 (183, 459) ng/L}, and the plasma sCLEC-2 levels of COVID-19 patients with severe {641 (406, 781) ng/L} or critical illness {776 (627, 860) ng/L} were significantly higher (p < 0.01, respectively) in comparison to those with mild illness {375 (278, 484) ng/L}. The ratio of the sCLEC-2 levels to platelets in COVID-19 patients with critical illness of infection was significantly higher (p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively) in comparison to COVID-19 patients with mild, moderate or severe illness. Plasma sCLEC-2 levels were significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 infection than in those with other infections, suggesting that platelet activation is triggered and facilitated by COVID-19 infection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 878 KiB  
Article
Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19) Related Thrombotic and Bleeding Complications in Critically Ill Patients: Experience from an Academic Medical Center
by Thejus Jayakrishnan, Aaron Haag, Shane Mealy, Corbyn Minich, Abraham Attah, Michael Turk, Nada Alrifai, Laith Alhuneafat, Fadi Khoury, Adeel Nasrullah, Patrick Wedgeworth, Melissa Mosley, Kirtivardan Vashistha, Veli Bakalov, Abhishek Chaturvedi and Swathi Sangli
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5652; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235652 - 30 Nov 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2582
Abstract
Introduction: Thrombosis and bleeding are recognized complications of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19), with a higher incidence described particularly in the critically ill. Methods: A retrospective review of COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care units (ICU) between 1 January 2020 and 31 [...] Read more.
Introduction: Thrombosis and bleeding are recognized complications of the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19), with a higher incidence described particularly in the critically ill. Methods: A retrospective review of COVID-19 patients admitted to our intensive care units (ICU) between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 was performed. Primary outcomes included clinically significant thrombotic and bleeding events (according to the ISTH definition) in the ICU. Secondary outcomes included mortality vis-a-vis the type of anticoagulation. Results: The cohort included 144 consecutive COVID-19 patients with a median age of 64 years (IQR 54.5–75). The majority were male (85 (59.0%)) and Caucasian (90 (62.5%)) with a median BMI of 30.5 kg/m2 (IQR 25.7–36.1). The median APACHE score at admission to the ICU was 12.5 (IQR 9.5–22). The coagulation parameters at admission were a d-dimer level of 109.2 mg/mL, a platelet count of 217.5 k/mcl, and an INR of 1.4. The anticoagulation strategy at admission included prophylactic anticoagulation for 97 (67.4%) patients and therapeutic anticoagulation for 35 (24.3%) patients, while 12 (8.3%) patients received no anticoagulation. A total of 29 patients (20.1%) suffered from thrombotic or major bleeding complications. These included 17 thrombus events (11.8%)—8 while on prophylactic anticoagulation (7 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose) and 9 while on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)—and 19 major bleeding events (13.2%) (4 on no anticoagulation, 7 on prophylactic (6 regular dose and 1 intermediate dose), and 8 on therapeutic anticoagulation (p-value = 0.02)). A higher thrombosis risk among patients who received remdesivir (18.8% vs. 5.3% (p-value = 0.01)) and convalescent serum (17.3% vs. 5.8% (p-value = 0.03%)) was noted, but no association with baseline characteristics (age, sex, race, comorbidity), coagulation parameters, or treatments (steroids, mechanical ventilation) could be identified. There were 10 pulmonary embolism cases (6.9%). A total of 99 (68.8%) patients were intubated, and 66 patients (45.8%) died. Mortality was higher, but not statistically significant, in patients with thrombotic or bleeding complications—58.6% vs. 42.6% (p-value = 0.12)—and higher in the bleeding (21.2%) vs. thrombus group (12.1%), p-value = 0.06. It did not significantly differ according to the type of anticoagulation used or the coagulation parameters. Conclusions: This study describes a high incidence of thrombotic and bleeding complications among critically ill COVID-19 patients. The findings of thrombotic events in patients on anticoagulation and major bleeding events in patients on no or prophylactic anticoagulation pose a challenging clinical dilemma in the issue of anticoagulation for COVID-19 patients. The questions raised by this study and previous literature on this subject demonstrate that the role of anticoagulation in COVID-19 patients is worthy of further investigation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2211 KiB  
Article
Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) as an Early Predictor for Mortality and Overall Survival in Hematological and Non-Hematological Patients with COVID-19: Multicenter Cohort Study
by Elżbieta Kalicińska, Monika Biernat, Justyna Rybka, Aleksander Zińczuk, Justyna Janocha-Litwin, Marta Rosiek-Biegus, Marta Morawska, Anna Waszczuk-Gajda, Joanna Drozd-Sokołowska, Łukasz Szukalski, Marcin Rymko, Paula Jabłonowska, Krzysztof Simon and Tomasz Wróbel
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4373; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194373 - 24 Sep 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2063
Abstract
COVID-19, as a disease involving the endothelium of multiple organs, is characterized by high mortality rates among hospitalized patients. Patients with hematological malignancies are particularly at risk of an unfavorable course of COVID-19. The endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) score has been [...] Read more.
COVID-19, as a disease involving the endothelium of multiple organs, is characterized by high mortality rates among hospitalized patients. Patients with hematological malignancies are particularly at risk of an unfavorable course of COVID-19. The endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX) score has been used as a simple predictor of overall survival (OS) in specific groups of hematological cancer patients. EASIX, as a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction, might play a prognostic role in patients with COVID-19. Here, we performed a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the EASIX score in 523 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with or without coexisting hematological cancer. Hematological cancer COVID-19 patients had higher EASIX scores compared to the overall population with COVID-19. In hematological patients, EASIX was a strong predictor of the occurrence of sepsis during COVID-19. Our findings demonstrated EASIX as a strong predictor of intensive care unit admission, in-hospital mortality, the occurrence of acute renal failure and the need for hemodialysis, both in hematological and non-hematological COVID-19 patients. Patients with a high EASIX score on COVID-19 diagnosis had significantly inferior OS compared to patients with low EASIX. We showed for the first time that EASIX might serve as a simple, universal prognostic tool of OS in both hematological and non-hematological COVID-19 patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 392 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Biomarkers of Severity in Patients with COVID-19 Infection
by Akitaka Yamamoto, Hideo Wada, Yuhuko Ichikawa, Hikaru Mizuno, Masaki Tomida, Jun Masuda, Katsutoshi Makino, Shuji Kodama, Masamichi Yoshida, Shunsuke Fukui, Isao Moritani, Hidekazu Inoue, Katsuya Shiraki and Hideto Shimpo
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(17), 3775; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173775 - 24 Aug 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2031
Abstract
Object: Although many Japanese patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) only experience mild symptoms, in some cases a patient’s condition deteriorates, resulting in a poor outcome. This study examines the behavior of biomarkers in patients with mild to severe COVID-19. Methods: The [...] Read more.
Object: Although many Japanese patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) only experience mild symptoms, in some cases a patient’s condition deteriorates, resulting in a poor outcome. This study examines the behavior of biomarkers in patients with mild to severe COVID-19. Methods: The disease severity of 152 COVID-19 patients was classified into mild, moderate I, moderate II, and severe, and the behavior of laboratory biomarkers was examined across these four disease stages. Results: The median age and male/female ratio increased with severity. The mortality rate was 12.5% in both moderate II and severe stages. Underlying diseases, which were not observed in 45% of mild stage patients, increased with severity. An ROC analysis showed that C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, procalcitonin (PCT), hemoglobin (Hb) A1c, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly useful for the differential diagnosis of mild/moderate I stage and moderate II/severe stage. In the severe stage, Hb levels, coagulation time, total protein, and albumin were significantly different on the day of worsening from those observed on the day of admission. The frequency of hemostatic biomarker abnormalities was high in the severe disease stage. Conclusion: The evaluation of severity is valuable, as the mortality rate was high in the moderate II and severe stages. The levels of CRP, ferritin, PCT, albumin, and LDH were useful markers of severity, and hemostatic abnormalities were frequently observed in patients in the severe disease stage. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 264 KiB  
Article
Severe Lymphopenia as a Predictor of COVID-19 Mortality in Immunosuppressed Patients
by María Martínez-Urbistondo, Ángela Gutiérrez-Rojas, Ane Andrés, Isabel Gutiérrez, Gabriela Escudero, Sonia García, Andrea Gutiérrez, Enrique Sánchez, Jesús Herráiz, Sara De La Fuente, Alejandro Callejas, Carmen De Mendoza and Víctor Moreno-Torres
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(16), 3595; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10163595 - 15 Aug 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2097
Abstract
Background. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a high mortality in certain group of patients. We analysed the impact of baseline immunosuppression in COVID-19 mortality and the role of severe lymphopenia in immunocompromised subjects. Methods. We analysed all patients admitted with COVID-19 in a [...] Read more.
Background. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has a high mortality in certain group of patients. We analysed the impact of baseline immunosuppression in COVID-19 mortality and the role of severe lymphopenia in immunocompromised subjects. Methods. We analysed all patients admitted with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital in Madrid between March 1st and April 30th 2020. Epidemiological and clinical data, including severe lymphopenia (<500 lymphocytes/mm3) during admission, were analysed and compared based on their baseline immunosuppression condition. Results. A total of 1594 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were hospitalised during the study period. 166 (10.4%) were immunosuppressed. Immunocompromised patients were younger (64 vs. 67 years, p = 0.02) but presented higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, heart, neurological, lung, kidney and liver disease (p < 0.05). They showed more severe lymphopenia (53% vs 24.1%, p < 0.001), lower SapO2/FiO2 ratios (251 vs 276, p = 0.02) during admission and higher mortality rates (27.1% vs 13.5%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, immunosuppression remained as an independent factor related to mortality (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.24, p < 0.001). In the immunosuppressed group, age (OR = 1.06, p = 0.01), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (OR = 12.27, p = 0.017) and severe lymphopenia (OR = 3.48, p = 0.04) were the factors related to high mortality rate. Conclusion. Immunosuppression is an independent mortality risk factor in COVID-19. Severe lymphopenia should be promptly identified in these patients. Full article
8 pages, 1501 KiB  
Article
Soluble C-Type Lectin-Like Receptor 2 Elevation in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction
by Akisato Nishigaki, Yuhuko Ichikawa, Minoru Ezaki, Akitaka Yamamoto, Kenji Suzuki, Kei Tachibana, Toshitaka Kamon, Shotaro Horie, Jun Masuda, Katsutoshi Makino, Katsuya Shiraki, Hideto Shimpo, Motomu Shimaoka, Katsue Suzuki-Inoue and Hideo Wada
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(15), 3408; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10153408 - 30 Jul 2021
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 1962
Abstract
Background: Acute cerebral infarction (ACI) includes cardiogenic ACI treated with anticoagulants and atherosclerotic ACI treated with antiplatelet agents. The differential diagnosis between cardiogenic and atherosclerotic ACI is still difficult. Materials and Methods: The plasma sCLEC-2 and D-dimer levels were measured using the STACIA [...] Read more.
Background: Acute cerebral infarction (ACI) includes cardiogenic ACI treated with anticoagulants and atherosclerotic ACI treated with antiplatelet agents. The differential diagnosis between cardiogenic and atherosclerotic ACI is still difficult. Materials and Methods: The plasma sCLEC-2 and D-dimer levels were measured using the STACIA system. Results: The plasma sCLEC-2 level was significantly high in patients with ACI, especially those in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI, and plasma D-dimer levels were significantly high in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma levels of sCLEC-2 and the sCLEC-2/D-dimer ratios in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI were significantly higher than those in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma D-dimer levels in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI were significantly lower than those in patients with cardioembolic ACI. The plasma levels of sCLEC-2 and the sCLEC-2/D-dimer ratios were significantly higher in patients with atherosclerotic or lacunar ACI or acute myocardial infarction in comparison to patients with cardioembolic ACI or those with deep vein thrombosis. Conclusion: Using both the plasma sCLEC-2 and D-dimer levels may be useful for the diagnosis of ACI, and differentiating between atherosclerotic and cardioembolic ACI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Editorial, Research

7 pages, 816 KiB  
Opinion
Unexpected CD5+ B Cell Lymphocytosis during SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Relevance for the Pathophysiology of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
by Andrea Nicola Mazzarello, Brisejda Koroveshi, Daniela Guardo, Lorella Lanza, Fabio Ghiotto, Silvia Bruno and Enrico Cappelli
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12030998 - 28 Jan 2023
Viewed by 5255
Abstract
Recently, cases of fortuitous discovery of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) during hospitalization for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been reported. These patients did not show a monoclonal B cell expansion before COVID-19 but were diagnosed with CLL upon a sudden lymphocytosis that occurred during [...] Read more.
Recently, cases of fortuitous discovery of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) during hospitalization for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have been reported. These patients did not show a monoclonal B cell expansion before COVID-19 but were diagnosed with CLL upon a sudden lymphocytosis that occurred during hospitalization. The (hyper)lymphocytosis during COVID-19 was also described in patients with overt CLL disease. Contextually, lymphocytosis is an unexpected phenomenon since it is an uncommon feature in the COVID-19 patient population, who rather tend to experience lymphopenia. Thus, lymphocytosis that arises during COVID-19 infection is a thought-provoking behavior, strikingly in contrast with that observed in non-CLL individuals. Herein, we speculate about the possible mechanisms involved with the observed phenomenon. Many of the plausible explanations might have an adverse impact on these CLL patients and further clinical and laboratory investigations might be desirable. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 231 KiB  
Case Report
Bleeding into the Abdominal and Ilio-Lumbar Muscles—A Rare Complication in the Course of COVID-19: Analysis of Four Cases and a Literature Review
by Magdalena Mackiewicz-Milewska, Katarzyna Sakwińska, Małgorzata Cisowska-Adamiak, Iwona Szymkuć-Bukowska, Dorota Ratuszek-Sadowska and Hanna Mackiewicz-Nartowicz
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(16), 4712; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11164712 - 12 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1413
Abstract
The risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications, mainly in the form of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in COVID-19 is well known, necessitating the administration of thrombotic prophylaxis in most patients. With a high risk of VTE complications or their [...] Read more.
The risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications, mainly in the form of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), in COVID-19 is well known, necessitating the administration of thrombotic prophylaxis in most patients. With a high risk of VTE complications or their presence, full anticoagulation may be associated with hemorrhagic complications. COVID-19 bleeding is rarely reported. Here, we present four cases of patients with muscle bleeding: two in the iliopsoas muscle, which resulted in death despite the embolization of the bleeding vessel, and two in the oblique and straight abdominal muscles, which were treated conservatively. In the reported cases, the severity of the bleeding coincided with the severity of the course of COVID-19. When observing a sudden drop in hemoglobin (Hb) in a patient with COVID-19, one must always remember the possible complications in the form of muscle bleeding, which can be fatal. Full article
Back to TopTop