energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Research on Coalbed Methane and Coal-Measure Gas: Exploration, Exploitation, and Utilization

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "H: Geo-Energy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 10 June 2025 | Viewed by 4160

Special Issue Editors

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
Interests: evaluation of coal measure reservoirs; hydraulic stimulation of coal seams; theory and technology of coalbed methane drainage

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Interests: coal reservoir evaluation; drilling fluid and reservoir protection; hydraulic fracture propagation and process optimization; coal fine control; coal mine methane extraction and utilization

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The development of coalbed methane (CBM) and coal-measure gas (CMG) represents a critical development in the evolution of cleaner energy solutions. These unconventional gas reservoirs have immense potential to supplement traditional fossil fuels while significantly reducing environmental impacts. Harnessing coalbed methane and coal-measure gas involves advanced extraction techniques that not only unlock previously inaccessible energy sources but also promote energy security by diversifying fuel resources. Their development underscores a pivotal shift towards sustainable energy practices, aligning with global efforts to mitigate climate change by providing a cleaner, more environmentally friendly energy alternative. This Special Issue entitled "Research on Coalbed Methane and Coal-Measure Gas: Exploration, Exploitation, and Utilization" is dedicated to advancing scientific knowledge and technological innovations in the field of coalbed methane and coal-measure gas.

Our primary aim is to provide a comprehensive platform for researchers, engineers, and practitioners to contribute to the understanding of the geological and engineering aspects of coalbed methane and coal-measure gas. The scope of this Special Issue encompasses studies on exploration techniques, including advanced geophysical methods and remote sensing, to identify optimal reservoirs. It also explores novel extraction technologies, reservoir engineering approaches, and sustainable utilization practices. We welcome both original research and review articles.

Potential topics of interest include but are not limited to, the following:

  • Characterization of coalbed methane and coal-measure gas reservoirs;
  • Evaluation methods and technologies of favorable areas in coalbed methane and coal-measure gas exploration;
  • Advances in coalbed methane and coal-measure gas drilling, fracturing, or drainage;
  • Chemical or biological developments for the enhanced recovery of coalbed methane and coal-measure gas;
  • Reservoir dynamic characterization in coalbed methane and coal-measure gas production;
  • Enhanced gas recovery combined with CO2 geological storage;
  • Advances in coalbed methane and coal-measure gas utilization;
  • Coal mine methane extraction and utilization.

Dr. Rui Li
Dr. Shuaifeng Lyu
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • coalbed methane
  • coal-measure gas
  • stimulation measures
  • enhanced gas recovery
  • methane extraction

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

17 pages, 7743 KiB  
Article
A Study on the Controlling Effect of Geological Structures on Coalbed Methane Occurrence in the Northeast Margin of Qinshui Basin, North China
by Rui Li, Le Zhang, Jun Xie, Zhaoying Chen, Baoke Yang, Wenting Xiang and Xikun Zhai
Energies 2025, 18(3), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18030647 - 30 Jan 2025
Viewed by 591
Abstract
This study investigated the patterns of gas occurrence in the coal seam structural zones of the northeastern margin of the Qinshui Basin, with a focus on the Sijiazhuang Coal Mine. Using laboratory experiments, theoretical analysis, and field exploration, we examined how geological structures [...] Read more.
This study investigated the patterns of gas occurrence in the coal seam structural zones of the northeastern margin of the Qinshui Basin, with a focus on the Sijiazhuang Coal Mine. Using laboratory experiments, theoretical analysis, and field exploration, we examined how geological structures influence gas distribution. The results show that gas content and pressure near normal faults are generally higher than those in reverse fault areas. However, fault-induced gas occurrence is complex, with stress superposition potentially reversing this trend. When a normal fault intersects modern tectonic stress at a perpendicular or large angle, the fault zone may transition to a compressional state, enhancing gas preservation. Fold structures were found to play a significant role in gas distribution, with anticline zones exhibiting the highest gas content, followed by syncline and normal zones. Collapse columns were shown to affect gas occurrence within a range of 15 to 180 m, with the impact depending on factors such as surrounding rock properties, hydrogeological conditions, and fault activity during collapse formation. Additionally, mirror-like sliding surfaces, formed by multiple factors, are prevalent in the coal seam structures of this region. These sliding surfaces are closely linked to structural zones and serve as valuable indicators for geological predictions in coal seam development. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 3623 KiB  
Article
Characteristics of the Microfracture and Pore Structure of Middle- and High-Rank Coal and Their Implications for CBM Exploration and Development in Northern Guizhou
by Haiying Ren, Zhijun Guo, Honggao Xie, Sijie Han, Xiaozhi Zhou, Lingyun Zhao, Yuanlong Wei and Wenci Qiu
Energies 2025, 18(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010005 - 24 Dec 2024
Viewed by 552
Abstract
The microfracture and pore structure characteristics of coal reservoirs are crucial for coalbed methane (CBM) development. This study examines the evolution of pore and fracture structures at the microscopic level and their fractal characteristics, elucidating their impact on CBM development in the northern [...] Read more.
The microfracture and pore structure characteristics of coal reservoirs are crucial for coalbed methane (CBM) development. This study examines the evolution of pore and fracture structures at the microscopic level and their fractal characteristics, elucidating their impact on CBM development in the northern Guizhou coal reservoirs. The results indicate that the pores and fractures in the coal reservoirs are relatively well-developed, which facilitates the adsorption of CBM. The density of primary fractures ranges from 5.8 to 14.4 pcs/cm, while the density of secondary fractures ranges from 3.6 to 11.8 pcs/cm. As the metamorphic degree of coal increases, the density of primary fractures initially increases and then decreases, whereas the density of secondary fractures decreases with increasing metamorphic degree. With increasing vitrinite reflectance, the specific surface area and pore volume of the coal samples first decrease and then increase. The fractal dimension ranges from 2.3761 to 2.8361; as the vitrinite reflectance of the coal samples increases, the fractal dimension D1 decreases initially and then increases, while D2 decreases. In the northern Guizhou region, CBM is characterized by an enrichment model of “anticline dominance + fault-hydrogeological dual sealing” along with geological controlling factors of” burial depth controlling gas content and permeability + local fault controlling accumulation”. The research findings provide a theoretical basis for the occurrence and extraction of CBM in northern Guizhou. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 7814 KiB  
Article
Fracture Propagation Laws and Influencing Factors in Coal Reservoirs of the Baode Block, Ordos Basin
by Qingfeng Zhang, Yongchen Li, Ziling Li, Yanbin Yao, Fengfeng Du, Zebin Wang, Zhihao Tang, Wen Zhang and Shutong Wang
Energies 2024, 17(23), 6183; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17236183 - 8 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 715
Abstract
The expansion of hydraulic fractures in coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs is key to effective stimulation, making it essential to understand fracture propagation and its influencing factors for efficient resource development. Using petrological characteristics, logging data, microseismic monitoring, and fracturing reports from the Baode [...] Read more.
The expansion of hydraulic fractures in coalbed methane (CBM) reservoirs is key to effective stimulation, making it essential to understand fracture propagation and its influencing factors for efficient resource development. Using petrological characteristics, logging data, microseismic monitoring, and fracturing reports from the Baode Block on the eastern Ordos Basin, this study systematically investigates the geological and engineering factors influencing hydraulic fracture propagation. The real-time monitoring of fracture propagation in 12 fractured wells was conducted using microseismic monitoring techniques. The results indicated that the fracture orientations in the study area ranged from NE30° to NE60°, with fracture lengths varying between 136 and 226 m and fracture heights ranging from 8.5 to 25.3 m. Additionally, the fracturing curves in the study area can be classified into four types: stable, descending, fluctuating, and falling. Among these, the stable and descending types exhibit the most effective fracture propagation and are more likely to generate longer fractures. In undeformed–cataclastic coals and bright and semi-bright coals, long fractures are likely to form. When the Geological Strength Index (GSI) of the coal rock ranges between 60 and 70, fracture lengths generally exceed 200 m. When the coal macrolithotype index (Sm) is below 2, fracture lengths typically exceed 200 m. When the difference between the maximum and minimum horizontal principal stresses exceeds 5 MPa, fractures with length >180 m are formed, while fracture heights generally remain below 15 m. From an engineering perspective, for the study area, hydraulic fracturing measures with a preflush ratio of 20–30%, an average sand ratio of 13–15%, and a construction pressure between 15 MPa and 25 MPa are most favorable for coalbed methane production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 16458 KiB  
Article
Research on the Law of Layered Fracturing in the Composite Roof Strata of Coal Seams via Hydraulic Fracturing
by Bo Wang, Enke Hou, Liang Ma, Zaibin Liu, Tao Fan, Zewen Gong, Yaoquan Gao, Wengang Du, Qiang Liu and Bingzhen Ma
Energies 2024, 17(8), 1941; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17081941 - 19 Apr 2024
Viewed by 1126
Abstract
Horizontal wells within the roof are an effective method to develop gas in broken and soft coal seams, and layer-penetrating fracturing is a key engineering method for the stimulating of horizontal wells within the roof of a coal seam. To understand the propagation [...] Read more.
Horizontal wells within the roof are an effective method to develop gas in broken and soft coal seams, and layer-penetrating fracturing is a key engineering method for the stimulating of horizontal wells within the roof of a coal seam. To understand the propagation law of fracture in the composite roof of coal seams, this study conducted research using numerical simulation and physical similarity simulation methods. Furthermore, engineering experiments were carried out at the Panxie coal mine in the Huainan Mining Area and the Luling coal mine in Huaibei Mining Area, to further validate this technology. The numerical simulation results indicated that fracture within the coal seam roof can propagate from the roof to the target coal seam, effectively fracturing the coal seam. Due to the coal seam’s plasticity being greater than that of the roof mudstone, the coal seam forms a broader fracture than the roof. With the increase in pseudo roof mudstone thickness and being under constant fracturing displacement, the energy consumed by the pseudo roof mudstone during fracturing causes a decrease in pore pressure when fracture extends to the coal seam, resulting in a reduction in fracture width. Therefore, the pseudo roof mudstone is an adverse factor for the expansion of hydraulic fracturing. Physical similarity simulation results demonstrated that when horizontal boreholes were arranged within the siltstone of the coal seam roof, were under reasonable vertical distance and high flow rate fracturing via fluid injection conditions, and if the coal seam had a thin pseudo roof mudstone, the fracture could propagate through the direct roof-pseudo roof interface and the pseudo roof-coal seam interface, extending to the lower coal seam. The fracture form was curved and had irregular vertical fractures, indicating that hydraulic fracturing can achieve production enhancement and the transformation of soft and hard coal seams. However, when the coal seam had a thick pseudo roof mudstone, the mudstone posed strong resistance to hydraulic fracturing, making it difficult for the fracture to propagate to the lower coal seam. Therefore, the pseudo roof mudstone plays a detrimental role in hydraulic fracturing and the production enhancement of coal seams. The engineering verification conducted at Panxie coal mine and Luling coal mine showed that by utilizing a construction drainage rate of 7.5 cubic meters per minute at Panxie coal mine, the maximum fracture length reached 218.3 m, with a maximum fracture height of 36.8 m. The maximum daily gas production of a single well reached 1450 cubic meters per day, with a total gas extraction volume of 43.62 × 104 cubic meters across 671 days. At Luling coal mine, utilizing a construction drainage rate of 10 cubic meters per minute, the maximum fracture length reached 169.1 m, with a maximum fracture height of 20.5 m. The maximum daily gas production of a single well reached 10,775 cubic meters per day, with a total gas extraction volume of 590 × 104 cubic meters for 1090 days. This indicated that the fracture within the roof of coal seams can penetrate the composite roof of coal seams and extend to the interior of the coal seams, achieving the purpose of transforming fractured and low-permeability coal seams and providing an effective mode of gas extraction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop