Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.8
2.5
Journals
Education Sciences
Special Issues
STEM in Early Childhood Education
share announcement

STEM in Early Childhood Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Early Childhood Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 December 2021) | Viewed by 54632

Special Issue Editors

Dr. Beth L. MacDonald

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Teacher Education and Leadership, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Interests: early childhood mathematics education; student cognition and learning; subitizing development; number construction; fraction development; teacher education; special education in mathematics
Dr. Kristin A. Searle

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Instructional Technology & Learning Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Interests: culturally responsive pedagogy; K–12 computer science education; technology integration; teacher professional development
Dr. Colby Tofel-Grehl

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Teacher Education and Leadership, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Interests: STEM teacher professional development; technology integration; STEM identity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Education Sciences focuses on STEM in Early Education. The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) curricula varies in quality in the early childhood years, making STEM instruction inconsistent between and within different preschool and early elementary grade levels. Given that fundamental STEM reasoning and thinking are established in early education, this lack of curricula development and the uneven manner in which it is deployed is problematic. In this Special Issue, we invite educators and researchers to identify some of the most compelling research examining STEM curricula development and submit a research manuscript.

 

When considering STEM in early education, we encourage researchers to consider points of integration that STEM curricula promotes in early education, such as:

  • Students’ STEM reasoning development when solving authentic, ill-structured problems;
  • Teacher education development when designing integrated units of study in STEM; or
  • Access points for educators and students when designing STEM projects with a cultural lens.

Given that STEM involves such multifaceted educational foci, we will consider articles involving STEM instruction, students’ cognition and learning of STEM, equitable learning structures in STEM, and pre- and in-service STEM teacher development in the PreK–3 grade levels. Guiding questions might include (but not be limited by), “What affordances are provided early childhood educators through STEM integrated curricula?”, “How do educators enact integrated STEM in early childhood education spaces?”, and “What points of integration afford high-quality STEM reasoning and thinking development in early childhood education classrooms?”

For this Special Issue to be published in 2021, we invite manuscripts of 7000–8000 words in length to be submitted for review on or before 1 June 1 2021. To determine a good fit for this Special Issue, we encourage authors to submit a 200-word abstract to the leading Guest Editor for preliminary review. Manuscripts will be subject to the process of blind peer review coordinated by the three Special Issue Guest Editors, Drs. Beth L. MacDonald, Colby Tofel-Grehl, and Kristin A. Searle.

Dr. Beth L. MacDonald
Dr. Kristin A. Searle
Dr. Colby Tofel-Grehl
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • STEM education
  • early childhood education
  • equity
  • curriculum design and development
  • integrated STEM
  • pedagogy
  • pedagogical content knowledge
  • technology integration
  • professional development
  • teacher education

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (12 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review

3 pages, 180 KiB  
Editorial
Play, Problem-Solving, STEM Conceptions, and Efficacy in STEM: An Introduction to the STEM in Early Childhood Education Special Issue
by Beth L. MacDonald, Colby Tofel-Grehl and Kristin A. Searle
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(5), 352; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050352 - 18 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3154
Abstract
This Special Issue of Education Sciences focuses on STEM in Early Childhood Education [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
2 pages, 160 KiB  
Editorial
The Silent Path towards Medical Apartheid within STEM Education: An Evolving National Pedagogy of Poverty through the Absenting of STEM-Based Play in Early Childhood
by Colby Tofel-Grehl, Beth L. MacDonald and Kristin A. Searle
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(5), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050342 - 12 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1970
Abstract
STEM is notoriously uninviting to wide swaths of the population [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review

19 pages, 2542 KiB  
Article
Instructional Perseverance in Early-Childhood Classrooms: Supporting Children’s Development of STEM Reasoning in a Social Justice Context
by Jennifer Ward, Joseph DiNapoli and Katie Monahan
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030159 - 24 Feb 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4024
Abstract
In early childhood education (ECE) classrooms, teachers navigate practices about how to allow space for students to make sense of new STEM-based ideas. We posit that such pedagogical moves require ample in-the-moment perseverance by the instructor. In this paper, we seek to explore [...] Read more.
In early childhood education (ECE) classrooms, teachers navigate practices about how to allow space for students to make sense of new STEM-based ideas. We posit that such pedagogical moves require ample in-the-moment perseverance by the instructor. In this paper, we seek to explore the nature of such instructional perseverance in ECE classrooms and how it manifests when ECE educators are supporting young children to develop their STEM reasoning, with a primary focus on the mathematics discipline in a social justice context. Working with a dataset consisting of four ECE classroom episodes, we employed an analytical framework that captured evidence of instructional perseverance. We found that the instructional perseverance of the ECE teacher was integral to the development of STEM reasoning of her young students. We present an illustrative case that details the instructional perseverance of the ECE teacher and the related STEM reasoning of her students in the context of exploring income variance by race. We argue that teacher education development must address how ECE teachers can plan for and navigate in-the-moment instructional obstacles in order to support young students’ STEM reasoning development, which positions students for productive STEM-based outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 24356 KiB  
Article
Exploring Measurement through Coding: Children’s Conceptions of a Dynamic Linear Unit with Robot Coding Toys
by Lise E. Welch, Jessica F. Shumway, Jody Clarke-Midura and Victor R. Lee
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020143 - 21 Feb 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3489
Abstract
Programming activities have the potential to provide a rich context for exploring measurement units in early elementary mathematics. This study examines how a small group of young children (ages 5–6) express their emergent conception of a dynamic linear unit and the measurement concepts [...] Read more.
Programming activities have the potential to provide a rich context for exploring measurement units in early elementary mathematics. This study examines how a small group of young children (ages 5–6) express their emergent conception of a dynamic linear unit and the measurement concepts they found challenging. Video of an introductory programming lesson was analyzed for evidence of preconceptions and conceptions of a dynamic linear unit. Using Artifact-Centric Activity Theory as a lens for the analysis, we found that social context, gesturing, and verbal descriptions influenced the children’s understanding of a dynamic linear unit. Challenges that students encountered included developing a constructed conception of a unit, reconciling preconceptions about the meaning of a code, and socially-influenced preconceptions. This study furthers the exploration of computational thinking and mathematics connections and provides a basis for future exploration of dynamic mathematics and programming learning in early elementary education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 4596 KiB  
Article
Exploring Preschool Data Collection and Analysis: A Pilot Study
by Ashley E. Lewis Presser, Jessica M. Young, Lindsay J. Clements, Deborah Rosenfeld, Michelle Cerrone, Janna F. Kook and Heather Sherwood
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 118; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020118 - 10 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 7491
Abstract
Data collection and analysis (DCA) skills apply mathematical knowledge, such as counting, sorting, and classifying, to investigations of real-world questions. This pursuit lays the foundation for learners to develop flexible problem-solving skills with data. This pilot study tested a preschool intervention intended to [...] Read more.
Data collection and analysis (DCA) skills apply mathematical knowledge, such as counting, sorting, and classifying, to investigations of real-world questions. This pursuit lays the foundation for learners to develop flexible problem-solving skills with data. This pilot study tested a preschool intervention intended to support teachers in promoting young children’s DCA skills using a technology-integrated approach. A key component therein was a teacher-facing digital app that facilitated collaboration between preschool teachers and children to more easily collect data, create simple graphs, and use graphed data to engage in real-world questions and discussions. As part of a design-based research approach, this study tested the intervention’s developmental appropriateness and feasibility in four preschool classrooms (n = 5). Findings suggest that the intervention curriculum (i.e., investigations) and inclusion of the app supported teachers and children to answer data-focused questions by engaging in each step of the DCA process while applying numerous mathematics skills. Teachers reported that the app complemented curricular implementation and children demonstrated readiness to engage with, and benefit from, the investigations. Findings also indicated the developmental appropriateness and feasibility of applying this DCA approach in preschools and suggest further study of the approach. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5405 KiB  
Article
Cookie-Jar Alarms: An Analysis of First-Grade Students’ Gendered Conceptions of Engineers following a Programming Design Task
by April Mitchell, Kimberly H. Lott and Colby Tofel-Grehl
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020110 - 7 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2883
Abstract
Women remain underrepresented in engineering and broadening participation has recently become the focus of education reform efforts. Increased emphasis on K-12 engineering education calls for the design of learning environments and curricula that increase interest and conceptual understanding of engineering work, beginning in [...] Read more.
Women remain underrepresented in engineering and broadening participation has recently become the focus of education reform efforts. Increased emphasis on K-12 engineering education calls for the design of learning environments and curricula that increase interest and conceptual understanding of engineering work, beginning in the early years of childhood. We seek to understand what works, for whom, in what contexts, how it works, and how engineering curricula can be improved to promote social justice. Here, we evaluate the impact of a curricular intervention designed to promote equity in elementary engineering education. The integrated STEM curriculum unit engages first-grade students in programming a cookie-jar alarm. Using a KIBO robot, students program a distance sensor to trigger the alarm and customize the sounds and flashing lights. Students’ pre-/post-drawings of ‘engineers at work’ were used to elicit reflection in semi-structured interviews, and to assess changes in students’ conceptions of engineering work following the curricular intervention. A mixed analysis of the data revealed students’ conceptual understanding of engineering work improved following the two-week curricular intervention, regardless of gender. However, the girls in the study were more likely than boys to identify as an engineer following the programming design task. We discuss the students’ self-reported explanations and elements of the intervention that may have facilitated conceptual change. We recommend that, to promote equity in engineering education, “gender-responsive” curricula are essential. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 10529 KiB  
Article
Problem Solving and Digital Transformation: Acquiring Skills through Pretend Play in Kindergarten
by Lena Hollenstein, Stefanie Thurnheer and Franziska Vogt
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020092 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 8798
Abstract
One of the crucial 21st-century digital skills, in the context of digital transformation, is problem solving—equally so in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In the context of kindergarten, learning through play is central; therefore, pretend play, and particularly guided [...] Read more.
One of the crucial 21st-century digital skills, in the context of digital transformation, is problem solving—equally so in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). In the context of kindergarten, learning through play is central; therefore, pretend play, and particularly guided pretend play, is suggested as an innovative way to foster skills for digital problem solving. As yet, the potential of pretend play for children’s learning about digital transformation and digital problem-solving processes has hardly been researched. The paper examines how children solve digital problems in guided pretend play. In an explorative intervention study “We play the future”, an information technology center (IT center) is introduced as one of the play corners for pretend play in kindergartens, together with other inputs such as a smart home corner (Internet of Things) or autonomous vehicles. Children’s play was video recorded. From the 15 participating kindergartens, 13 h of sequences involving the IT center were analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that children identify problems in a play situation and solve them using problem-solving strategies, such as devising new applications and installing software. Furthermore, the findings show that the kindergarten teacher’s participation in the pretend play is important for enabling longer and more complex problem-solving processes. Consequences for further teacher training to foster problem-solving skills during guided pretend play are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1740 KiB  
Article
Early Elementary Students’ Use of Shape and Location Schemas When Embedding and Disembedding
by Laura Bofferding, Lizhen Chen, Sezai Kocabas and Mahtob Aqazade
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 83; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020083 - 25 Jan 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3071
Abstract
Elementary students’ early development of embedding and disembedding is complex and paves the way for later STEM learning. The purpose of this study was to clarify the factors that support students’ embedding (i.e., overlapping shapes to form a new shape) and disembedding (i.e., [...] Read more.
Elementary students’ early development of embedding and disembedding is complex and paves the way for later STEM learning. The purpose of this study was to clarify the factors that support students’ embedding (i.e., overlapping shapes to form a new shape) and disembedding (i.e., identifying discrete shapes within another shape) through the use of filled shapes as opposed to shape frames. We recruited 26 Grade 1 students (~6–7 years old) and 23 Grade 3 students (~8–9 years old), asked them to work on two layered puzzle designs from the Color Code puzzle game, and interviewed them about their thinking processes. The first graders had higher success rates at fixing and embedding the tiles correctly, and students at both grade levels improved on the three-tile design when encountering it a second time about two months later. The four-tile design was more difficult, but students improved if they could identify a correct sub-structure of the design. Successful students used a combination of pictorial shape strategies and schematic location strategies, systematically testing tiles and checking how they could be embedded. The results suggest that helping students focus on sub-structures can promote their effective embedding. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 465 KiB  
Article
The Relationship between Teacher Candidates’ Affective Dispositions and Instructional Planning Actions in STEM
by Megan Burton, Cathrine Maiorca and Lucretia Octavia Tripp
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020082 - 25 Jan 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3651
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between elementary teacher candidate affective dispositions and the action of STEM lesson planning. While affective dispositions are important, understanding the connection between dispositions and practice is key. Teacher candidates’ affective dispositions about STEM education and instructional planning were [...] Read more.
This study explores the relationship between elementary teacher candidate affective dispositions and the action of STEM lesson planning. While affective dispositions are important, understanding the connection between dispositions and practice is key. Teacher candidates’ affective dispositions about STEM education and instructional planning were examined after participating in a virtual STEM experience. Seventeen elementary teacher candidates experienced STEM instruction via summer virtual courses and field placements. This article focuses on responses to questions about affective dispositions that were coded using inductive analysis. Dispositions towards the following themes were identified: ways to teach integrated STEM, use of inquiry and open ended questions, and confidence. Early childhood lesson plans were coded deductively using the characteristics of model-eliciting activities. Analysis of the data found that teacher candidates who experienced learning, observing, and planning via virtual experiences demonstrated positive affective dispositions towards teaching STEM. However, there were areas of disconnect between the affective dispositions expressed and the instructional action of planning STEM lessons. The data suggest the experiences of learning, observing, and planning STEM lessons can be meaningful in professional growth, but that more needs to be done beyond these experiences to create synergy between instructional actions and affective dispositions related to STEM education. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 3917 KiB  
Article
Understanding the Conceptions of Engineering in Early Elementary Students
by Sandra A. Lampley, Sarah Roller Dyess, Michael P. J. Benfield, Andrew M. Davis, Sampson E. Gholston, Monica L. Dillihunt and Matthew W. Turner
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(1), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010043 - 13 Jan 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3529
Abstract
There is a demand for more STEM professionals. Early elementary students’ conceptions about engineering can influence whether or not they explore STEM career paths and ultimately select an engineering career. This study examined the conceptions elementary students have regarding the work that engineers [...] Read more.
There is a demand for more STEM professionals. Early elementary students’ conceptions about engineering can influence whether or not they explore STEM career paths and ultimately select an engineering career. This study examined the conceptions elementary students have regarding the work that engineers perform. The research questions were the following: (1) what images do early elementary students associate with engineering and engineers, (2) do these associations vary from grade to grade, (3) are there gendered differences in these associations, and (4) how do the associations from this sample compare with the associations from the broader (grades one–five) Cunningham, Lachapelle, and Lindgren-Steider (2005) sample? Survey data from 1811 students in grades one–three were analyzed by comparison analysis and cluster analysis and then compared to the initial Cunningham et al. (2005) study. The results indicate two ways elementary students envision engineering: (a) creating designs or collecting and analyzing data, and (b) utilizing equipment to build and improve things. Comparison with the Cunningham et al. (2005) study suggests that there may be shifts in the way elementary students perceive engineering. Since these shifts could be attributed to a variety of factors, future work that determines what learning experiences might be contributing to students’ conceptions about engineering is recommended. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 10592 KiB  
Article
Has the Stereotype of the Scientist Changed in Early Primary School–Aged Students Due to COVID-19?
by César Quílez-Cervero, María Diez-Ojeda, Altamira Alicia López Gallego and Miguel Ángel Queiruga-Dios
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(7), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070365 - 20 Jul 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3657
Abstract
The image that students have of scientists and their context appears distorted by multiple factors. The detection and modification of this image is important because this is related to scientific vocations. This research analyzes the drawings made by 128 early primary school–aged students [...] Read more.
The image that students have of scientists and their context appears distorted by multiple factors. The detection and modification of this image is important because this is related to scientific vocations. This research analyzes the drawings made by 128 early primary school–aged students (58 girls and 70 boys) from 6 to 8 years to determine the image they have regarding the scientist, their activity, and their environment, and how the current situation due to COVID-19 may affect this image. The analysis rubric defined in the modified Draw A Scientific Test-prompt was used. Results indicate that the image that the students have, in general, is far from the traditional one. Thus, the students draw both young women and men working in science, the girls being the ones who most habitually represent scenes broader than traditional. In addition, the influence of the COVID-19 crisis is perceived in some of the illustrations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research

19 pages, 8907 KiB  
Review
Lessons Learned from 10 Experiments That Tested the Efficacy and Assumptions of Hypothetical Learning Trajectories
by Arthur J. Baroody, Douglas H. Clements and Julie Sarama
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(3), 195; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030195 - 10 Mar 2022
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 5099
Abstract
Although reformers have embraced learning trajectories (LT, also called learning progressions) as an important tool for improving mathematics education, the efficacy and assumptions of LT-based instruction are largely unproven. The aim of a recently completed research project was to fill this void. Fulfilling [...] Read more.
Although reformers have embraced learning trajectories (LT, also called learning progressions) as an important tool for improving mathematics education, the efficacy and assumptions of LT-based instruction are largely unproven. The aim of a recently completed research project was to fill this void. Fulfilling this aim was more challenging than many supporters of LT-based instruction might imagine. A total of 10 experiments were untaken, of which 5 demonstrated that LT-based instruction was significantly more efficacious than a counterfactual involving either a Teach-to-Target/Skip-Level approach (Assumption 1) or the same unordered activities (Assumption 2). The results of the remaining studies were non-significant either for theoretical (2) or methodological (3) reasons. In the five indicating LTs’ efficacy, we found that some LTs consists of levels that are facilitative conditions for the next higher level and, thus, may be helpful but perhaps not necessary for the subsequent level. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEM in Early Childhood Education)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-12
Back to TopTop