Cultivating Professional Teachers for Science Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 February 2025 | Viewed by 1207

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Teacher Education and Leadership, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Interests: STEM teacher professional development; technology integration; STEM identity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Teaching and Learning, Utah State Board of Education, Salt Lake City, UT 84093, USA
Interests: professional learning opportunities for pre-service and in-service teachers; formats for professional learning; elementary science and STEM education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Teacher Education and Leadership, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
Interests: early childhood science learning; teacher professional development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

It has been over a decade since the release of A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas (NRC, 2012). The Framework established expectations for teaching science in K-12 that were delineated and clarified, ensuring that the three dimensions of science (i.e., Science and Engineering Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Disciplinary Core Ideas) are present within science instruction. While parts of these three dimensions were familiar to some science teachers, many educators found themselves unprepared, as this was not how they experienced science instruction as students or learned to teach during their teacher education programs. The Framework effectively re-noviced teachers of science. Thus, a dilemma emerged for science teacher educators—how do we cultivate professional teachers of science within this new culture? Currently, there is a need to curate a collection of research aimed to address this issue. What professional learning opportunities, pre-service education program changes, and/or other support has been offered to teachers to support them as they incorporated the instructional shifts outlined by the Framework? Furthermore, how have these new resources impacted teacher practice and culture? These are questions that states, local education agencies, and teams of teachers are asking.

This Special Issue centers around research with a focus on cultivating professional teachers for science instruction with special attention to the culture of science teaching and teachers. By understanding the realities, challenges, and communities of professional science teachers, this Special Issue seeks to engage in rigorous discourse around science teacher culture and community. These professional communities are rich with complex practices, discourses, and challenges informed by the teachers that make them up. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method methodologies are welcomed as we seek a diverse understanding of science teacher professional communities. Additionally, theoretical manuscripts offering an epistemological approach or framework for addressing issues of teacher culture are encouraged.

Questions regarding this Special Issue should be directed to the Guest Editors.

Dr. Colby Tofel-Grehl
Dr. Melissa P. Mendenhall
Dr. Kimberly H. Lott
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • science teacher culture
  • science teacher identity
  • science instruction
  • three-dimensional instruction
  • professional development
  • teacher education programs (science)

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 312 KiB  
Article
Unlocking STEM Pathways: Revealing STEM Choices and Science Teachers Empowering Black Queer Students
by Arsene Frederic Jr., Madison Fitzgerald-Russell, William Shelton, Mario I. Suárez and Jason C. Garvey
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111254 - 15 Nov 2024
Viewed by 663
Abstract
Despite efforts to address racial disparities in STEM fields, little attention has been paid to the experiences and aspirations of queer and trans Black (QT Black) students in grades K-12. This study explored whether there were any significant differences in the choice of [...] Read more.
Despite efforts to address racial disparities in STEM fields, little attention has been paid to the experiences and aspirations of queer and trans Black (QT Black) students in grades K-12. This study explored whether there were any significant differences in the choice of STEM majors between QT Black students and non-QT Black students. We found that Black QT students are less likely to choose STEM majors. Additionally, we found significant differences in science teachers’ perceptions of teaching, comparing between QT Black and non-QT Black students. Finally, we found that several factors predicted science-teacher perception of collective responsibility, perceptions of content professional learning community (PLC), self-efficacy, perception of content teacher expectations, and perceptions of principal support for teachers of QT Black and non-QT Black students. Implications for research and practice are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cultivating Professional Teachers for Science Education)
Back to TopTop