cancers-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Cancers

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Survivorship and Quality of Life".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 December 2025 | Viewed by 3157

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research Centre on Public Health, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
Interests: public health; health-economics; drug-utilization; (pharmaco)epidemiology; pharmacovigilance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research Centre on Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
Interests: public health; epidemiology; health-economics and patients reported outcomes

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cancers are among the leading causes of death worldwide, accounting for approximately 10.0 million deaths in 2022. The incidence and mortality of cancer are expected to rise in the coming decades due to an aging population and the interaction of various risk factors, including tobacco use, alcohol use, unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, and air pollution. Cancer imposes a significant health, humanistic, and economic burden on society. It affects all aspects of the economy, including increased costs associated with patient management, reduced productivity, unemployment, labor losses, and decreased capital investment. Some studies estimate that cancer will cost the global economy USD 25.2 trillion, underscoring the urgent need for investment in cancer prevention, diagnosis, control, treatment, and rehabilitation.

In recent decades, the advent of genomic medicine and precision oncology has helped improve treatment outcomes. Advances in the understanding of molecular pathways and the availability of technologies for detecting actionable genetic mutations have enabled the development of targeted therapies that block specific pathway activities, thereby allowing personalized treatment options. However, these new treatments have posed significant challenges in sustainability and equity access to all patients for national healthcare systems. In this context, it is crucial to assess whether the additional costs of new treatments are justified by improved health outcomes. Therefore, decision modeling plays a crucial role in estimating the value of new cancer therapies. Given the increasing demand for new, effective treatments within the constraints of a limited healthcare budget, cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) provides decision makers with an objective basis for informed decision making.

This Special Issue aims for the following:

  • Update the current knowledge on methodological aspects of conducting economic evaluations for cancer therapies;
  • Provide new evidence on cost-effectiveness of innovative treatments used in the management of patients with cancer;
  • Summarize evidence on the cost-effectiveness of cancer innovative treatments, as well as on the methods used to analyze health economic aspects of these therapies.

In this Special Issue, original articles and reviews are welcome. 

Dr. Ippazio Cosimo Antonazzo
Dr. Paolo Cortesi
Dr. Pietro Ferrara
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • cancer therapies
  • cost-effectiveness
  • cost-utility
  • cost-consequence
  • treatment economic impact
  • health economic
  • economic sustainability
  • public health
  • decision analytical models.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 310 KB  
Article
Direct and Indirect Costs of Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Assessment of Economic and Social Impact
by Izabela Gąska, Aleksandra Czerw, Monika Pajewska, Olga Partyka, Andrzej Deptała, Anna Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Natalia Czerw, Dominika Mękal, Katarzyna Sygit, Katarzyna Wojtyła-Blicharska, Jarosław Drobnik, Piotr Pobrotyn, Dorota Waśko-Czopnik, Adam Wiatkowski, Michał Marczak, Tomasz Czapla, Ewa Bandurska, Weronika Ciećko, Elżbieta Grochans, Anna M. Cybulska, Daria Schneider-Matyka, Kamila Rachubińska and Remigiusz Kozlowskiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(19), 3257; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193257 - 8 Oct 2025
Viewed by 673
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant cancer among men, and according to the predictions, the estimated number of new cases will substantially grow in the coming years. Therefore, the costs of the disease will increase as well. Methods: We conducted [...] Read more.
Background: Prostate cancer is the second most common malignant cancer among men, and according to the predictions, the estimated number of new cases will substantially grow in the coming years. Therefore, the costs of the disease will increase as well. Methods: We conducted a literature review of the state of knowledge about the costs of treatment and the economic burden of prostate cancer. The vast majority of studies were focused on direct costs only, which clearly shows the literature gap. Results: We focused on the estimates of direct costs, i.e., treatment of prostate cancer, adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment, and supportive and palliative care, and indirect costs. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicated that docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was the most cost-effective strategy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER): USD 13,647). In contrast, novel therapies such as PARP inhibitors and whole-genome-sequencing-guided treatments were not cost-effective unless drug prices were reduced by 47–70%. In the United States, 5-year cumulative treatment costs ranged from USD 48,000 for conservative management to over USD 91,000 for radiotherapy, while out-of-pocket expenses averaged AUD 1172 in Australia. Indirect costs were also considerable, with Slovakia reporting an increase in sick leave costs from EUR 1.2 million in 2014 to EUR 2.1 million in 2022. Conclusions: Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were the most frequent categories for various treatment cost evaluations. A few specific combinations of drugs were cost-effective only under the condition of dropping the unit prices of a medication. Further summarizing, reviewing, and developing a methodology for standardized comparisons are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2101 KB  
Article
The Cost-Effectiveness of Sugemalimab Plus CAPOX in Treating Advanced Gastric Cancer: Analysis from the GEMSTONE-303 Trial
by Chen-Han Chueh, Wei-Ming Huang, Ming-Yu Hong, Yi-Wen Tsai, Nai-Jung Chiang and Hsiao-Ling Chen
Cancers 2025, 17(19), 3171; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193171 - 29 Sep 2025
Viewed by 538
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Sugemalimab demonstrated clinical efficacy in the GEMSTONE-303 trial, but its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy (CAPOX) as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Sugemalimab demonstrated clinical efficacy in the GEMSTONE-303 trial, but its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab in combination with chemotherapy (CAPOX) as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma, compared to chemotherapy alone, from the perspective of Taiwan’s healthcare payer. Methods: A partitioned survival model was developed to simulate outcomes over a 40-year time horizon, and model parameters were derived from GEMSTONE-303 and the wider literature. Health benefits were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and only direct medical costs were included, with both discounted at an annual rate of 3%. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at three times the 2024 GDP per capita. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted alongside scenario analyses. Results: Compared to capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) alone, adding sugemalimab yielded an incremental gain of 0.39 QALYs at an additional cost of USD 47,020, resulting in an incremental net monetary benefit of −USD 7478. Conclusions: Sugemalimab plus CAPOX is not cost-effective for advanced or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan payer’s perspective. Achieving cost-effectiveness would require a 20–30% price reduction for sugemalimab (to USD 1204–USD 1376 per 600 mg), assuming first-line therapy is administered for the median treatment duration observed in the GEMSTONE-303 trial. If reimbursement continued until disease progression, a reduction of approximately 68% would be required (USD 550 per 600 mg). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 434 KB  
Systematic Review
The Cost of Breast Cancer: Economic and Social Perspective
by Izabela Gąska, Aleksandra Czerw, Monika Pajewska, Olga Partyka, Andrzej Deptała, Anna Badowska-Kozakiewicz, Michał Budzik, Katarzyna Sygit, Paulina Wojtyła-Buciora, Jarosław Drobnik, Piotr Pobrotyn, Dorota Waśko-Czopnik, Julia Pobrotyn, Ewa Bandurska, Weronika Ciećko, Elżbieta Grochans, Anna M. Cybulska, Daria Schneider-Matyka, Kamila Rachubińska, Petre Iltchev, Tomasz Czapla and Remigiusz Kozlowskiadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(18), 3012; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183012 - 15 Sep 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1324
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant cancer among women, following lung cancer in the general population [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cost-Effectiveness Studies in Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop