Next Article in Journal
Teachers’ Perceptions of the Pedagogical Challenges of State Language Instruction to Hungarian Minority Students in Slovakia
Next Article in Special Issue
A Privacy-Conscious AI Framework for Early Identification of At-Risk Students Across Disciplines Using LMS Engagement Data
Previous Article in Journal
How Specific Design Features in E-Picture Books Support Preschoolers’ Emergent Reading: A Mixed-Methods Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantifying Perception-Based Student Success with Generative AI: An Exploratory Monte Carlo Simulation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stage-Dependent Behavioral Patterns in MOOC Dropout: An Explainable Learning Analytics Study

College of Artificial Intelligence, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(7), 999; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16070999
Submission received: 31 March 2026 / Revised: 2 June 2026 / Accepted: 15 June 2026 / Published: 24 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI in Higher Education: Advancing Research, Teaching, and Learning)

Abstract

The high dropout rate in massive open online courses (MOOCs) continues to limit their potential in promoting inclusive and sustainable learning. Although many prediction models have been used to identify potential dropouts, most studies view dropout as a static classification problem and fail to clearly reveal the dynamic trajectory of learner participation over time. Therefore, this study introduces a phased analysis perspective, treating MOOC dropout as a process that continuously evolves at different stages. On the basis of the KDDCUP2015 dataset, we constructed behavioral characteristics at three time points: the first week, the third week, and the fifth week. By combining robust feature analysis and interpretable models, we systematically examined the changing patterns of dropout modes. The results revealed significant differences across the different stages. In the early stage of the course, dropout was related mainly to the unstable interaction behaviors of learners, such as restricted access to resources and irregular participation rhythms. In the middle and late stages, task-oriented behaviors, especially those related to video-based learning activities, gradually became key factors. Notably, high-frequency video participation does not always reduce the risk of dropout; when video activity is high but the overall interaction rate is low, it is more likely to indicate an increase in the risk of dropout. These results indicate that the combination of behaviors is more crucial than mere activity levels. By revealing the changing characteristics of behaviors at different stages, this study helps support the design of more practical early warning methods.
Keywords: MOOC dropout; learning analytics; behavioral patterns; stage-based modeling; early warning systems MOOC dropout; learning analytics; behavioral patterns; stage-based modeling; early warning systems

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiang, X.; Song, J.; Duan, S.; Wang, L.; Yan, J. Stage-Dependent Behavioral Patterns in MOOC Dropout: An Explainable Learning Analytics Study. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16070999

AMA Style

Xiang X, Song J, Duan S, Wang L, Yan J. Stage-Dependent Behavioral Patterns in MOOC Dropout: An Explainable Learning Analytics Study. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(7):999. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16070999

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiang, Xinyu, Jiayue Song, Shukai Duan, Lidan Wang, and Jia Yan. 2026. "Stage-Dependent Behavioral Patterns in MOOC Dropout: An Explainable Learning Analytics Study" Education Sciences 16, no. 7: 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16070999

APA Style

Xiang, X., Song, J., Duan, S., Wang, L., & Yan, J. (2026). Stage-Dependent Behavioral Patterns in MOOC Dropout: An Explainable Learning Analytics Study. Education Sciences, 16(7), 999. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16070999

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop