This study considered and compared silver, gold, and their combination of nanoparticles (AgNPs, AuNPs, and Au-AgNPs) with biocompatible material mesoporous silica SBA-15 as potential antibacterial agents. A facile, one-pot “green” methodology, utilizing L-histidine as a reducing agent and bridge between components, was employed
[...] Read more.
This study considered and compared silver, gold, and their combination of nanoparticles (AgNPs, AuNPs, and Au-AgNPs) with biocompatible material mesoporous silica SBA-15 as potential antibacterial agents. A facile, one-pot “green” methodology, utilizing L-histidine as a reducing agent and bridge between components, was employed to obtain Ag@SBA-15, Au@SBA-15, and Au-Ag@SBA-15 nanocomposites without the use of external additives. Various physicochemical tools (UV-Vis, TEM, SAED, FESEM, XPS, BET, XRD, and FTIR) presented SBA-15 as a good carrier for spherical AgNPs, AuNPs, and Au-AgNPs with average diameters of 8.5, 16, and 9 nm, respectively. Antibacterial evaluations of
Escherichia coli and
Staphylococcus aureus showed that only Ag@SBA-15, at a very low Ag concentration (1 ppm) during 2 h of contact, completely reduced the growth (99.99%) of both strains, while the Au@SBA-15 nanocomposite required higher concentrations (5 ppm) and time (4 h) to reduce 99.98%
E. coli and 94.54%
S. aureus. However, Au introduction in Ag@SBA-15 to form Au-Ag@SBA-15 negatively affected its antibacterial potential, lowering it due to the galvanic replacement reaction. Nevertheless, the rapid and effective combating of two bacteria at low NPs concentrations, through the synergistic effects of mesoporous silica and AgNPs or AuNPs, in Ag@SBA-15 and Au@SBA-15 nanocomposites, provides a potential substitute for existing bacterial disinfectants.
Full article