Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Deep Learning and Copula Models for Flood–Drought Compound Analysis in Iran
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flood-Induced Agricultural Damage Assessment: A Case Study of Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Does Understanding Water Footprint and Virtual Water Concepts Promote Water Conservation?

1
College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
2
Department of Health Science, University of Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(24), 3480; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243480
Submission received: 29 October 2025 / Revised: 2 December 2025 / Accepted: 5 December 2025 / Published: 8 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Perspectives on the Water–Energy–Food Nexus)

Abstract

Amid escalating global water scarcity and growing emphasis on demand-side interventions for sustainable resource use, understanding how consumers’ virtual water cognition can drive food–water resource conservation is critical for strengthening sustainable resource governance. Through a questionnaire survey, this study constructed a Food–Water Behavior Synergy Model to explore the relationship among consumers’ virtual water cognition and food-conservation behavior, water-conservation behavior, and food–water synergistic cognition in China. Results show that virtual water cognition significantly increased food-conservation behavior (β = 0.158, p < 0.001) and WCB (β = 0.064, p < 0.001). Food–water synergistic cognition also positively affected food-conservation behavior (β = 0.099, p < 0.001) and water-conservation behavior (β = 0.035, p < 0.01), consistent with the knowledge–action framework. The magnitudes of these effects differed across subgroups (gender, education level, major, region, and urban–rural residence). Virtual water cognition did not significantly enhance food–water synergistic cognition (β = 0.006, p = 0.758), providing empirical evidence of a knowledge–action gap. There was a strong direct effect of food-conservation behavior on water-conservation behavior (β = 0.498, p < 0.001), and there was evidence that food-conservation behavior mediated the indirect paths from both virtual water cognition and food–water synergistic cognition to water-conservation behavior. Implementing consumer-oriented contextual interventions—such as differentiated educational guidance and water-footprint labeling—would be conducive to translating theoretical knowledge into practical action.
Keywords: knowledge–action framework; food–water synergy; behavioral spillover; water-conservation consumption; food-conservation behaviors knowledge–action framework; food–water synergy; behavioral spillover; water-conservation consumption; food-conservation behaviors

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Wu, M.; Albano, R.; Cao, X. Does Understanding Water Footprint and Virtual Water Concepts Promote Water Conservation? Water 2025, 17, 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243480

AMA Style

Zhang S, Wu M, Albano R, Cao X. Does Understanding Water Footprint and Virtual Water Concepts Promote Water Conservation? Water. 2025; 17(24):3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243480

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shengqian, Mengyang Wu, Raffaele Albano, and Xinchun Cao. 2025. "Does Understanding Water Footprint and Virtual Water Concepts Promote Water Conservation?" Water 17, no. 24: 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243480

APA Style

Zhang, S., Wu, M., Albano, R., & Cao, X. (2025). Does Understanding Water Footprint and Virtual Water Concepts Promote Water Conservation? Water, 17(24), 3480. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17243480

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop