Next Article in Journal
The pH Value Control of Morphology and Luminescence Properties of Gd2O2S: Tb3+ Phosphors
Next Article in Special Issue
3D Finite Element Analysis of a Concrete Dam Behavior under Changing Hydrostatic Load: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Magneto-Mechanical Enhancement of Elastic Moduli in Magnetoactive Elastomers with Anisotropic Microstructures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Accuracy of Linear Finite Element Models of Vehicle Structures Considering Spot-Welded Flanges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA MAT_187_SAMP-1 Considering Failure with GISSMO

Institute for Engineering Design, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Hermann-Blenk-Strasse 42, 38108 Brunswick, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(2), 643; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020643
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 5 January 2022 / Accepted: 12 January 2022 / Published: 15 January 2022

Abstract

A neural network (NN)-based method is presented in this paper which allows the identification of parameters for material cards used in Finite Element simulations. Contrary to the conventionally used computationally intensive material parameter identification (MPI) by numerical optimization with internal or commercial software, a machine learning (ML)-based method is time saving when used repeatedly. Within this article, a self-developed ML-based Python framework is presented, which offers advantages, especially in the development of structural components in early development phases. In this procedure, different machine learning methods are used and adapted to the specific MPI problem considered herein. Using the developed NN-based and the common optimization-based method with LS-OPT, the material parameters of the LS-DYNA material card MAT_187_SAMP-1 and the failure model GISSMO were exemplarily calibrated for a virtually generated test dataset. Parameters for the description of elasticity, plasticity, tension–compression asymmetry, variable plastic Poisson’s ratio (VPPR), strain rate dependency and failure were taken into account. The focus of this paper is on performing a comparative study of the two different MPI methods with varying settings (algorithms, hyperparameters, etc.). Furthermore, the applicability of the NN-based procedure for the specific usage of both material cards was investigated. The studies reveal the general applicability for the calibration of a complex material card by the example of the used MAT_187_SAMP-1.
Keywords: parameter identification; machine learning; hyperparameter optimization; LS-DYNA; MAT_187_SAMP-1; GISSMO failure model parameter identification; machine learning; hyperparameter optimization; LS-DYNA; MAT_187_SAMP-1; GISSMO failure model

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meißner, P.; Winter, J.; Vietor, T. Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA MAT_187_SAMP-1 Considering Failure with GISSMO. Materials 2022, 15, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020643

AMA Style

Meißner P, Winter J, Vietor T. Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA MAT_187_SAMP-1 Considering Failure with GISSMO. Materials. 2022; 15(2):643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meißner, Paul, Jens Winter, and Thomas Vietor. 2022. "Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA MAT_187_SAMP-1 Considering Failure with GISSMO" Materials 15, no. 2: 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020643

APA Style

Meißner, P., Winter, J., & Vietor, T. (2022). Methodology for Neural Network-Based Material Card Calibration Using LS-DYNA MAT_187_SAMP-1 Considering Failure with GISSMO. Materials, 15(2), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop