Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV

A special issue of Vaccines (ISSN 2076-393X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 January 2026) | Viewed by 39158

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
National HIV/AIDS Research Center, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 00161 Rome, Italy
Interests: HIV infection and pathogenesis; HIV-1–host interaction; HCV/HIV co-infection
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Vaccines are one of the most important interventions in public health. Although antiviral drugs have improved, they are expensive and reinfection is still possible, so it is crucial to develop vaccines against HIV. However, it is difficult to develop these vaccines because of the genetic diversity and multiple immune evasion strategies of HIV. Both preventative and therapeutic approaches have failed to demonstrate full efficacy, so new approaches are needed. People living with HIV (PLWH) are at higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases due to B cell, T cell, and NK cell dysfunction; chronic inflammation; and persistent mucosal epithelial abnormalities. Immune responses to vaccines are often suboptimal in PLWH, and HIV-infected children have a higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases. Increasing the number or amounts of vaccine doses or using adjuvanted vaccines may improve immunogenicity in PLWH but further research is needed to understand the efficacy of different vaccine regimes.

In this Special Issue, we welcome research articles, review articles, and short communications that examine optimal immunization strategies and the ongoing development of vaccines against HIV, viral hepatitis, and HPV in PLWH, as well as novel challenges in the field of HIV vaccine research.

Dr. Ivan Schietroma
Dr. Sonia Moretti
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Vaccines is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Publisher’s Notice

The Special Issue, together with its publications, has been removed from Section Vaccines Against Tropical and Other Infectious Diseases on 17 December 2025. The publications remain available in the regular issues in which they were originally published. The Editorial Office confirms that these articles adhered to MDPI's standard editorial process (https://www.mdpi.com/editorial_process).

Keywords

  • preventative vaccine
  • therapeutic vaccine
  • HIV
  • hepatitis A
  • hepatitis B
  • human papillomavirus
  • sexually transmitted infections
  • immunoprotection
  • vaccination
  • preventable diseases

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (14 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

3 pages, 136 KB  
Editorial
Closing Editorial—Special Issue on “Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses and HPV”
by Sonia Moretti and Ivan Schietroma
Vaccines 2026, 14(5), 434; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14050434 - 12 May 2026
Viewed by 254
Abstract
We are pleased to present this closing editorial for the Special Issue “Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses and HPV”, which we had the privilege of coordinating [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

11 pages, 376 KB  
Article
A Cross-Sectional Survey on HPV Vaccination in a Houston HIV Clinic
by Shailee R. Modi, Erika S. Fanous, Avery N. Sinnathamby, Laura O. Van Buskirk, Jason L. Holliday, J. Brooks Jackson and Mary B. Rysavy
Vaccines 2026, 14(4), 286; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14040286 - 24 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 603
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and causes cervical cancer in women. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are particularly susceptible to this virus. An effective vaccine against high-risk HPV genotypes is available. This study sought to [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and causes cervical cancer in women. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are particularly susceptible to this virus. An effective vaccine against high-risk HPV genotypes is available. This study sought to evaluate barriers to HPV vaccination in HIV-positive female patients between the ages of 18 and 65 in a county clinic in Houston. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in May–June 2025 with 131 patients at Thomas Street Health Center in Houston. The survey assessed patient demographics, attitudes toward and knowledge of HPV vaccination (at least one dose), as well as self-reported cervical dysplasia and HPV infection history. Clinical data on available cervical dysplasia history were also gathered from the electronic medical record. Descriptive statistics were compiled, and comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants were performed using one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables in R. Results: 75% of patients had prior knowledge of the HPV vaccine, but only 33% reported receiving at least one dose. The most common reason for not receiving the vaccine was never having been offered the vaccine by a provider. Separately, almost 40% of unvaccinated individuals had never heard of the vaccine. Of note, only 8.6% of respondents reported fully understanding the implications of vaccination and still choosing to decline. In this cross-sectional study, there was no statistically significant association between vaccination status and either recent dysplasia history in the electronic record or reported dysplasia or HPV infection history. Among eligible unvaccinated participants, 41% received the HPV vaccine after completing the survey. Conclusions: Addressing gaps in HPV vaccine communication and supporting clinicians in delivering confident counseling may improve vaccination rates in this at-risk population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2299 KB  
Article
Protein Priming Followed by a Replication-Competent VSV-GP Vector Boost Induces Sustained Immune Control in Therapeutic Hepatitis B Vaccination
by Jinpeng Su, Anna D. Kosinska, Susanne Miko, Edanur Ates Öz, Dorothee von Laer, Janine Kimpel and Ulrike Protzer
Vaccines 2026, 14(3), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14030266 - 16 Mar 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 786
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Eliciting robust immune responses against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) through therapeutic vaccination holds promise for curing chronic hepatitis B. We previously developed the heterologous protein prime/viral vector boost clinical vaccine candidate, TherVacB. Here, we evaluated a replication-competent chimeric vesicular [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Eliciting robust immune responses against the hepatitis B virus (HBV) through therapeutic vaccination holds promise for curing chronic hepatitis B. We previously developed the heterologous protein prime/viral vector boost clinical vaccine candidate, TherVacB. Here, we evaluated a replication-competent chimeric vesicular stomatitis virus vector (VSV-GP) as an alternative viral vector boost vaccine. Methods: A recombinant VSV-GP vector co-expressing HBV surface and core antigens (VSV-GP-HBs/c) was generated and characterized for antigen expression. Its immunogenicity, antiviral efficacy, and durability were assessed in HBV-naïve and HBV-carrier mice, using protein primed, viral vector-primed, and multi-viral vector boost regimens. Results: VSV-GP-HBs/c efficiently expressed both HBV antigens in vitro. A single immunization with VSV-GP-HBs/c induced only weak HBV-specific immune responses in vivo. Replacing protein priming with VSV-GP-HBs/c resulted in modest immune activation and limited antiviral effects in HBV-carrier mice. In contrast, substituting the modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-HBs/c boost in the TherVacB regimen with VSV-GP-HBs/c elicited robust HBV-specific antibody responses and strong CD4 and CD8 T-cell immunity, assessed by intracellular IFN-γ staining after peptide stimulation. This regimen achieved a substantial reduction in serum HBsAg levels, numbers of HBV-positive hepatocytes, and intrahepatic HBV-DNA, with antiviral efficacy comparable to that of the classical TherVacB regimen. Notably, a second viral vector boost did not enhance HBV-specific immunity or antiviral efficacy; instead, it promoted dominant vector-specific CD8 T-cell responses. Long-term analyses performed 10 weeks after the last vaccination further demonstrated that a single protein-prime/VSV-GP-HBs/c boost was sufficient to achieve sustained antiviral control. Conclusions: These findings identify VSV-GP-HBs/c as an effective boost vector for therapeutic hepatitis B vaccination and establish protein priming followed by a single viral vector boost as an optimal strategy for sustained antiviral immunity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 250 KB  
Article
Impact of Adjuvant Nonavalent HPV Vaccination on Viral Clearance in HPV-Positive Women With and Without Excisional Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by Ali Deniz Erkmen and Kevser Arkan
Vaccines 2026, 14(2), 141; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14020141 - 29 Jan 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1994
Abstract
Background: Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the key driver of cervical carcinogenesis and post-treatment recurrence. Although excisional treatment effectively removes dysplastic tissue, it does not directly target viral persistence. While HPV vaccination is well established in primary prevention, its potential [...] Read more.
Background: Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the key driver of cervical carcinogenesis and post-treatment recurrence. Although excisional treatment effectively removes dysplastic tissue, it does not directly target viral persistence. While HPV vaccination is well established in primary prevention, its potential role as an adjuvant strategy in HPV-positive women, particularly with respect to viral clearance, remains incompletely defined. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included HPV-positive women with at least 12 months of follow-up who were managed at a tertiary gynecology clinic. Patients were stratified according to HPV vaccination status with the nonavalent vaccine (Gardasil 9) and excisional treatment status with loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). HPV clearance at 12 months was defined as the primary outcome, while histological outcomes were evaluated as secondary and independent endpoints. Analyses were performed in the overall cohort and stratified by LEEP status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with HPV persistence, adjusting for baseline disease severity and clinical covariates. Results: A total of 935 HPV-positive women were included in the final analysis. Completion of the three-dose HPV vaccination schedule was associated with significantly higher HPV clearance rates at 12 months compared with no vaccination. This association was consistently observed in women who underwent LEEP as well as in those managed without excisional treatment. In multivariable analysis, HPV vaccination emerged as an independent protective factor against HPV persistence, whereas LEEP status itself was not independently associated with viral clearance after adjustment for baseline histological severity. Histological outcomes differed according to baseline disease severity and did not demonstrate a direct one-to-one relationship with HPV clearance. Conclusions: Adjuvant vaccination with the nonavalent HPV vaccine is independently associated with increased HPV clearance in HPV-positive women at 1-year follow-up, irrespective of excisional treatment status. HPV clearance and histological regression represent related but distinct biological processes and should be evaluated as independent outcomes. These findings support a broader role for HPV vaccination beyond primary prevention and suggest potential clinical benefit of vaccination as an adjunctive strategy in the management of HPV-positive women. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
14 pages, 219 KB  
Article
Factors Associated with HPV Vaccine Uptake in College Students Following the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Kathleen H. Scarbrough, Sana Malik, Devika Patel, Kiersten Pflueger, Linda Mermelstein, Yunhan Liao and Barbara Nemesure
Vaccines 2026, 14(2), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14020122 - 27 Jan 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1157
Abstract
Background: Most cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are preventable through vaccination, yet uptake among U.S. college students remains below national targets. This study examined HPV vaccination rates and factors associated with vaccine uptake among students aged 18–26 years at a large, diverse [...] Read more.
Background: Most cancers caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) are preventable through vaccination, yet uptake among U.S. college students remains below national targets. This study examined HPV vaccination rates and factors associated with vaccine uptake among students aged 18–26 years at a large, diverse public university in New York State following the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: In March 2022, an online survey was distributed to 19,351 students aged 18–26 years; responses were received from 708 students (~4%) and included in the analysis. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of HPV vaccination. Results: Overall, 59% of students reported receiving at least one HPV vaccine dose, while 17.7% were unsure of their vaccination status. Among students whose healthcare provider recommended the HPV vaccine, 76.4% were vaccinated compared to 16.7% without one (p < 0.001). Healthcare provider recommendation was the strongest predictor of vaccination (OR 17.9; 95% CI: 8.45–37.91). Additional factors significantly associated with uptake included agreement that the HPV vaccine is safe (OR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.54–4.27), importance of a sexual partner being vaccinated (OR 2.65; 95% CI: 1.90–3.69), and valuing family opinion (OR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.23–2.26). Students most preferred receiving HPV information from healthcare providers (73.4%), followed by Internet searches (51.8%) and social media (35.1%). Conclusions: HPV vaccination uptake among college students remains below national targets. Strengthening provider recommendations, addressing safety concerns, and implementing multimodal education strategies during preventive visits for young adults are essential to improve coverage and reduce HPV-related cancer risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
12 pages, 822 KB  
Article
Antibody Response Against SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein in People with HIV After COVID-19 Vaccination
by María José Muñoz-Gómez, Pablo Ryan, Marta Quero-Delgado, María Martin-Vicente, Guillermo Cuevas, Jorge Valencia, Eva Jiménez, Natalia Blanca-López, Samuel Manzano, Juan Ignacio Lazo, Vicente Mas, Mónica Vázquez, Daniel Sepúlveda-Crespo, Juan Torres-Macho, Isidoro Martínez and Salvador Resino
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 480; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050480 - 29 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1727
Abstract
Background/Objectives: People with HIV (PWH) often have a suboptimal response to vaccines, raising concerns regarding the efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in this population. We aimed to evaluate the humoral immune response to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant in PWH [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: People with HIV (PWH) often have a suboptimal response to vaccines, raising concerns regarding the efficacy of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in this population. We aimed to evaluate the humoral immune response to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant in PWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART) following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 19 PWH on ART who received a two-dose series of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and a booster six months later. Participants without HIV infection (n = 25) were included as a healthy control (HC) group. The humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine (anti-SARS-CoV-2 S IgG levels and ability to block ACE2-S interaction) against both the original B.1 lineage and the Omicron variant was assessed using immunoassays. Results: The humoral response in PWH was very strong (geometric mean fold rise, GMFR > 8) after the second dose and strong (GMFR > 4) after the booster dose for both the B.1 lineage and the Omicron variant. We found comparable humoral responses to the B.1 lineage and Omicron variant between PWH and HC groups after the second and booster doses (q-value > 0.05). The COVID-19 vaccine generated a significantly weaker humoral response against the Omicron variant compared to the B.1 lineage in both groups (q-value < 0.05). However, this response improved after the booster dose, although it remained weaker in PWH. Conclusions: PWH showed a strong humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine against B.1 and Omicron, though the Omicron response was weaker than B.1. Booster doses in PWH improved the Omicron response, but it stayed lower than B.1. Findings confirm vaccine effectiveness in PWH, stressing the critical role of boosters and potential need for updated vaccines for variants like Omicron. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1563 KB  
Article
Hepatitis A Seroprevalence Among HIV-Exposed and Unexposed Pediatric Populations in South Africa
by Edina Amponsah-Dacosta, Lufuno Ratshisusu, Lorato M. Modise, Ntombifuthi Blose, Omphile E. Simani, Selokela G. Selabe, Benjamin M. Kagina and Rudzani Muloiwa
Vaccines 2024, 12(11), 1276; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111276 - 13 Nov 2024
Viewed by 2909
Abstract
Background: There is limited evidence comparing hepatitis A seroprevalence among HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU), HIV-infected (HIV), and unexposed uninfected (HUU) children. This compromises rational vaccine decision-making. Methods: This study comprised a retrospective health facility-based population of children aged 1 month–12 years. Archival sera were [...] Read more.
Background: There is limited evidence comparing hepatitis A seroprevalence among HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU), HIV-infected (HIV), and unexposed uninfected (HUU) children. This compromises rational vaccine decision-making. Methods: This study comprised a retrospective health facility-based population of children aged 1 month–12 years. Archival sera were tested for markers of acute (anti-HAV IgM) or past (total anti-HAV) HAV infection. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on perinatal HIV exposure or infection status. Results: Among 513 children, the median age was 10 (IQR: 4–25) months. The median maternal age was 29 (IQR: 25–34) years. An anti-HAV seropositivity of 95.1% (117/122 [95% CI 90.2–98.4]) was found among those ≤6 months of age, indicative of the rate of transplacental antibody transfer. Among 1–12-year-olds, hepatitis A seroprevalence was 19.3% (37/192 [95% CI 14.1–25.7]), while 1.1% (2/188 [95% CI 0.12–2.76]) had evidence of acute infection. Compared to HIV-exposed subgroups (HIV = 60%, 6/10 [95% CI 27.4–86.3] and HEU = 45%, 9/20 [95% CI 23.8–68]), hepatitis A seroprevalence among HUU children was low (29.2%, 47/161 [95% CI 22.4–37.0]). Conclusions: Natural immunity among HIV-exposed and unexposed children in South Africa is insufficient to protect against severe liver complications associated with HAV infection later in adulthood. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1549 KB  
Article
Cost-Effectiveness of Hepatitis E Vaccination Strategies among Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases in China: A Model-Based Evaluation
by Fengge Wang, Lu Zhou, Abram L. Wagner, Zixiang Chen and Yihan Lu
Vaccines 2024, 12(10), 1101; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12101101 - 26 Sep 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2286
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a leading cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide, primarily transmitted through contaminated water and food. In patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), HEV infection might worsen the prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis E [...] Read more.
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a leading cause of acute viral hepatitis worldwide, primarily transmitted through contaminated water and food. In patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), HEV infection might worsen the prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis E vaccination strategies in CLD patients. A decision tree–Markov cohort model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of universal-vaccination, vaccination-following-screening, and no-vaccination strategies in 100,000 CLD patients over their lifetimes, simulating cohorts aged ≥16 years, ≥40 years, and ≥60 years, based on the licensed vaccination ages and typical ages of CLD onset, from a societal perspective. Model parameters were retrieved and estimated from previous publications and government data. The outcomes included HEV-related cases, costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Compared to no-vaccination, universal-vaccination reduced HEV-related cases by 32.8% to 39.6%, while vaccination-following-screening reduced them by 38.1% to 49.3%. Furthermore, universal-vaccination showed ICERs of USD 6898.33, USD 6638.91, and USD 6582.69 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for cohorts aged ≥16, ≥40, and ≥60 years, respectively. Moreover, the vaccination-following-screening strategy significantly enhanced cost-effectiveness, with ICERs decreasing to USD 6201.55, USD 5199.46, and USD 4919.87 per QALY for the cohorts. Additionally, one-way sensitivity analysis identified the discount rate and utility for CLD patients as the key factors influencing ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated the vaccination-following-screening strategy was cost-effective with probabilities of 92.50%, 95.70%, and 95.90% for each cohort. Hepatitis E vaccination in CLD patients costs less than GDP per capita for each QALY gained in China. The vaccination-following-screening strategy may be the optimal option, especially in those over 60 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

14 pages, 565 KB  
Review
Advances in HPV Vaccination in People Living with HIV: A Review
by Megan Mooberry, J. Brooks Jackson and Mary B. Rysavy
Vaccines 2026, 14(2), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14020194 - 21 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1690
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and is a leading cause of cervical, anal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers. This review summarizes the epidemiology of HPV and the immunogenicity, clinical efficacy, and current HPV vaccination recommendations among people living [...] Read more.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and is a leading cause of cervical, anal, penile, and oropharyngeal cancers. This review summarizes the epidemiology of HPV and the immunogenicity, clinical efficacy, and current HPV vaccination recommendations among people living with HIV (PLWH). PLWH experience a disproportionate burden of HPV-related infection and HPV-related malignancies. Although HPV vaccines have been shown to be highly effective, vaccination coverage among PLWH remains suboptimal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Barriers to vaccination include extended dosing schedules, limited awareness of the vaccine, and misinformation. Evidence indicates HPV vaccines are safe and induce a robust antibody response in PLWH, especially among individuals with higher CD4+ cell counts and viral suppression on antiretroviral therapy. However, evidence for reduction in clinical HPV-related disease in this population remains limited. Ongoing research is aimed at optimizing the HPV vaccination schedule for PLWH and expanding vaccination in older, high-risk subgroups. Integrating HPV vaccination into HIV care is essential to reduce HPV-related morbidity and mortality in PLWH. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 7110 KB  
Review
Hepatitis B Virus Seroprevalence in Ayacucho, Peru: A Comprehensive Review Across the Pre-Vaccination and Post-Vaccination Periods
by Homero Ango-Aguilar, Jimmy Ango-Bedriñana, Obert Marín-Sánchez and Ruy D. Chacón
Vaccines 2025, 13(9), 916; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13090916 - 28 Aug 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3812
Abstract
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health concern, with perinatal transmission as the primary route in endemic populations. Ayacucho is a priority region due to its high incidence (second nationally between 2019 and 2024) and the significant decline in vaccination [...] Read more.
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health concern, with perinatal transmission as the primary route in endemic populations. Ayacucho is a priority region due to its high incidence (second nationally between 2019 and 2024) and the significant decline in vaccination coverage (~15%). This study aims to synthesize existing epidemiological evidence on HBV seroprevalence in Ayacucho, Peru, emphasizing temporal changes observed before and after the implementation of vaccination programs to inform control strategies. This review was conducted, integrating data from diverse population groups, including children, pregnant women, blood donors, high-risk individuals (military personnel, female sex workers, prisoners), and household contacts, to identify transmission patterns and evaluate the impact of immunization efforts. Historically, Ayacucho was hyperendemic, with an HBsAg prevalence of 20% in Huanta (1985–1986) and a high mortality from liver diseases. The introduction of a vaccination in the 1990s led to a drastic reduction in infection rates among children, from 24.4–30.4% (1994) to 2.3–5.1% (1997), and improved overall Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) coverage. However, recent data (2000–2024) reveal a concerning increase in HBV cases since 2012, with peaks in 2016 and 2023, correlating with a decline in vaccination rates post-2021. HBV prevalence remains elevated among high-risk populations—including military personnel, female sex workers, and prisoners—as well as among blood donors (HBsAg: 3.73–5.0%; anti-HBc: 21–33%). In addition, significant knowledge gaps and low adherence to EPI strategies were observed. Despite initial vaccination success, Ayacucho faces a resurgence of HBV infection, exacerbated by declining vaccine coverage and vulnerabilities in high-risk populations. Reinforcing immunization programs and screening strategies is urgent to control and eventually eliminate HBV cases in the region. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 681 KB  
Review
Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions in Global Immunization Strategies
by Francesco Branda, Grazia Pavia, Alessandra Ciccozzi, Angela Quirino, Nadia Marascio, Simona Gigliotti, Giovanni Matera, Chiara Romano, Chiara Locci, Ilenia Azzena, Noemi Pascale, Daria Sanna, Marco Casu, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Massimo Ciccozzi and Fabio Scarpa
Vaccines 2024, 12(11), 1293; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12111293 - 19 Nov 2024
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 10057
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a widespread viral pathogen, responsible for a significant burden of cervical and other cancers worldwide. Over the past decades, the development and widespread adoption of prophylactic HPV vaccines have dramatically reduced the incidence of HPV-related diseases. However, despite the [...] Read more.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a widespread viral pathogen, responsible for a significant burden of cervical and other cancers worldwide. Over the past decades, the development and widespread adoption of prophylactic HPV vaccines have dramatically reduced the incidence of HPV-related diseases. However, despite the efficacy of these vaccines, global immunization efforts still face several obstacles, including low vaccination coverage in low- and middle-income countries, vaccine hesitancy, and disparities in access to healthcare. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of HPV vaccines, including their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and real-world efficacy. We will explore the impact of HPV vaccines on cancer prevention, examine the challenges related to vaccine distribution and uptake, and assess the role of public health policies in improving global vaccination rates. Additionally, the review will highlight the latest advancements in therapeutic HPV vaccines, ongoing research into next-generation vaccines, and the potential of HPV vaccination strategies in the context of personalized medicine. By examining these factors, we aim to provide insights into the future directions of HPV vaccination and its role in global public health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

16 pages, 1648 KB  
Systematic Review
The Cost-Effectiveness of the Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination in Asia Pacific Countries: What Lessons Can Indonesia Learn?—A Systematic Review
by Suzanna Patricia Mongan, Joshua Byrnes and Hansoo Kim
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 593; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060593 - 30 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4519
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer is a significant issue in Indonesia, with many cases diagnosed at advanced stages. Although the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has long been recommended by the WHO, it was only recently included in Indonesia’s immunization program in 2023. This study aimed [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer is a significant issue in Indonesia, with many cases diagnosed at advanced stages. Although the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has long been recommended by the WHO, it was only recently included in Indonesia’s immunization program in 2023. This study aimed to examine the existing prevention strategies and their effectiveness through systematic review of the existing literature. Methods: We searched for cost-effectiveness studies of HPV vaccination in Asia Pacific countries from inception until 23 July 2023, using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The search strategy included keywords and subject terms for primary prevention, HPV vaccination, cervical cancer, and selected Asia Pacific Countries (Thailand, Vietnam, China, Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong). Studies selected were limited to original research articles with full text published in English in peer-reviewed journals, describing the cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination in cervical cancer prevention in the Asia Pacific countries. Studies were excluded if there were no full text was available, if it was the wrong study design, non-English, or not based in the specific Asia Pacific countries selected. The titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text reviews using Covidence software, and analyzed using Excel. Results: Forty-three studies were included for review: 51% in high-income countries (HICs), 37% in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and 12% in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). All studies concluded that HPV vaccination is more cost-effective than screening alone. Nonavalent HPV vaccines were more cost-effective in HICs (80%), bivalent vaccines were more cost-effective in UMICs (66%), and gender-neutral vaccination was cost-effective compared to screening in all studies conducted. Conclusions: HPV vaccination is a cost-effective prevention strategy for cervical cancer across all resource settings, offering greater value compared to screening alone. Selecting the most economically viable vaccine type and expanding to gender-neutral vaccination could enhance early prevention efforts. These findings offer guidance for Indonesia in designing evidence-based HPV vaccination policies as a part of national cancer control efforts. Further investigation is necessary to determine the optimal strategy for HPV vaccination in Indonesia. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 739 KB  
Brief Report
Persistent Low Anti-HIV Neutralizing Antibody Titers in HIV/HCV Coinfection Despite HCV Cure: A 5-Year Longitudinal Analysis
by Daniel Sepúlveda-Crespo, Víctor Sánchez-Merino, Rafael Amigot-Sánchez, Almudena Rubio-Pérez, Cristina Díez, Víctor Hontañón, Juan Berenguer, Juan González-García, Felipe García, Isidoro Martínez, Eloísa Yuste and Salvador Resino
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 539; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050539 - 19 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1283
Abstract
Background: Anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies (anti-HIV-nAbs) play a critical role in the immune defense against HIV by preventing viral entry and limiting replication. This study longitudinally evaluated the titers and variability of anti-HIV-nAbs in individuals coinfected with HIV and HCV. Samples were collected [...] Read more.
Background: Anti-HIV neutralizing antibodies (anti-HIV-nAbs) play a critical role in the immune defense against HIV by preventing viral entry and limiting replication. This study longitudinally evaluated the titers and variability of anti-HIV-nAbs in individuals coinfected with HIV and HCV. Samples were collected at three time points: before starting HCV treatment, one year after completion, and five years post-treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 71 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who achieved a sustained virologic response following antiviral therapy for HCV. A control group of 41 HIV-monoinfected individuals was also included. Anti-HIV-nAb titers were evaluated by HIV neutralization assays using a panel of six recombinant HIV viruses representing multiple genetic subtypes. Generalized Linear Mixed Models and Generalized Linear Models were used for statistical analysis. p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (q-value). Results: HIV-neutralizing antibody responses in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals remained stable over five years following HCV therapy without significant changes (q-value > 0.05). The mean neutralization scores remained stable, with baseline scores of 6.1 (95% CI: 5.4–6.7), 6.2 (95% CI: 5.5–6.8) at one year post-HCV therapy, and 6.0 (95% CI: 5.3–6.7) at five years post-HCV therapy. HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals consistently showed lower neutralization scores compared to the control group throughout the follow-up (q-value < 0.05). Regression analyses adjusted for age, gender, nadir CD4+, and baseline CD4+ counts confirmed that the observed differences between HIV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals persisted (q-value < 0.05) at both the baseline and after HCV therapy completion. Conclusions: Successful HCV eradication in HIV/HCV-coinfected individuals did not normalize anti-HIV-nAb titers, which remained consistently lower than those in HIV-monoinfected controls over five years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 807 KB  
Systematic Review
Health Equity and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Interventions for Adolescents: A Systematic Review
by Sarah B. Maness, Lois Coleman Carpenter, Idara Akpan, Nubwa St. James, Daniela Romero-Cely, G. J. Corey Harmon, Miranda Cano and Erika L. Thompson
Vaccines 2025, 13(5), 485; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13050485 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4081
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes multiple types of cancer, and demographic-based inequities in HPV-related cancers persist. Behavioral interventions have increased HPV vaccination uptake, yet it is unclear how intervention effects vary by demographics. The purpose of this study was to examine whether existing [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes multiple types of cancer, and demographic-based inequities in HPV-related cancers persist. Behavioral interventions have increased HPV vaccination uptake, yet it is unclear how intervention effects vary by demographics. The purpose of this study was to examine whether existing HPV vaccine interventions for adolescents have unequal effects on HPV vaccine uptake. Methods: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL in October 2023. The search strategy combined keywords and subject terms for HPV vaccine, interventions/health promotion, and adolescents. Studies were included in final analyses if they were peer-reviewed, published in the US between 2006 and 2023, included outcome measures from an evidence-based HPV vaccination intervention, included adolescents aged 9–17, and demographic variables for age, race/ethnicity, income/SES, or geographic region. Studies were excluded if they were review articles, abstract-only, dissertations or theses, non-English language, non-US-based, or outside the age range of 9–17. Studies were also excluded if they did not include an intervention, outcome evaluation measures, or demographic measures. The screening and extraction processes were independently performed by multiple reviewers using Covidence software. Results: Ultimately, 74 articles were included for full extraction. Sex was the most common demographic variable analyzed by the HPV vaccine (n = 38), followed by race/ethnicity (n = 15), income/SES (n = 6), and geographic region (n = 6). Conclusions: Few interventions assess whether intervention results differ by demographics, making it unclear whether these interventions reduce health inequities. This review included a wide variation in study designs, limiting our ability to uniformly assess study conclusions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccines and Vaccination: HIV, Hepatitis Viruses, and HPV)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop