Previous Issue
Volume 14, May
 
 

Vaccines, Volume 14, Issue 6 (June 2026) – 2 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 967 KB  
Article
Safety, Immunogenicity of Co-Administered Vaccines, and Lot-to-Lot Consistency of a 14-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14®) Administered at 6–10–14 Weeks in Healthy Infants: A Multicenter, Phase IV Trial
by Subhash Thuluva, Subbareddy Gunneri, Siddalingaiah Ningaiah, Vijay Yerroju, Rammohan Reddy Mogulla, Kamal Thammireddy, Chirag Dhar, Shivani Desai, Piyush Paliwal, Chandrudu Loka, Nagaganesh Balne, Suresh Kommanapalli, Chinmayi Joshi, Kishori Sharan Agarwal, Girish P. Charde, Manish Narang, Jai Prakash Narayan, Bheemisetty S. Chakravarthy, Niranjana S. Mahantshetti, Pramod Prabhakar Jog, Prashanth Madapura Virupakshappa, Savita Verma, Madhukar Pandey and Pareshkumar A. Thakkaradd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2026, 14(6), 464; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060464 (registering DOI) - 22 May 2026
Abstract
Background: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have substantially reduced pneumococcal disease in children; however, serotype distribution varies geographically, and residual disease due to non-PCV13 serotypes persists. Biological E’s PNEUBEVAX 14® (BE-PCV14), a WHO-prequalified 14-valent PCV, expands coverage by including serotypes 22F and 33F. [...] Read more.
Background: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have substantially reduced pneumococcal disease in children; however, serotype distribution varies geographically, and residual disease due to non-PCV13 serotypes persists. Biological E’s PNEUBEVAX 14® (BE-PCV14), a WHO-prequalified 14-valent PCV, expands coverage by including serotypes 22F and 33F. As PCVs are co-administered with routine Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) vaccines, post-licensure data on safety, co-administration, and lot-to-lot consistency are essential. This multicenter phase IV study evaluated BE-PCV14 in healthy PCV-naïve infants aged 6–8 weeks across 31 sites in India. Methods: A total of 2600 infants were enrolled and vaccinated at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age; 2300 received BE-PCV14 and 300 received PCV13. All participants received concomitant DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib and oral rotavirus vaccines per routine schedule. Safety was assessed through solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Immunogenicity subsets evaluated responses to co-administered vaccines and serotype-specific responses across three BE-PCV14 lots. Results: Among 2600 vaccinated infants, at least one AE occurred in 26.35% (95% CI: 24.59, 28.19) of BE-PCV14 and 24.67% (95% CI: 20.13, 29.84) of PCV13 recipients; most were mild. Injection-site pain and pyrexia were the most common events. Immune responses to co-administered vaccines were comparable between groups and met the non-inferiority criteria: lower bound of the two-sided 95% CI > −10 percentage points for seroprotection/seroconversion rate differences using the Farrington–Manning method. Lot-to-lot consistency was demonstrated, with all GMC ratios within the predefined equivalence margin (0.5–2.0). Conclusions: BE-PCV14 was well tolerated. Immune responses to co-administered routine EPI vaccines met predefined non-inferiority criteria, supporting the interpretation that BE-PCV14 did not result in clinically meaningful immune interference. Consistent immune responses across manufacturing lots further support its use in infant immunization programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Advancement, Efficacy and Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 3588 KB  
Review
Nanotechnology-Based Cancer Vaccines: Translational Barriers and Emerging Strategies
by Muneera Anwer and Rifat Rahman
Vaccines 2026, 14(6), 463; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14060463 - 22 May 2026
Abstract
Cancer vaccines represent a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy by inducing tumour-specific immune responses. However, their clinical efficacy remains limited due to challenges in antigen selection, including the distinction between self and non-self-antigens, as well as issues related to antigen delivery, immune activation, [...] Read more.
Cancer vaccines represent a promising strategy in cancer immunotherapy by inducing tumour-specific immune responses. However, their clinical efficacy remains limited due to challenges in antigen selection, including the distinction between self and non-self-antigens, as well as issues related to antigen delivery, immune activation, and tumour immune evasion. Advances in nanotechnology have introduced innovative approaches to improve vaccine stability, targeted delivery, and immunogenicity. Nanoparticle-based platforms, including lipid, polymeric, inorganic nanoparticles, and virus-like particles, enable efficient delivery of tumour antigens and immunostimulatory adjuvants to antigen-presenting cells, thereby enhancing adaptive immune responses. Despite these advances, several translational challenges persist, including immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments, inefficient lymph node targeting, safety concerns, and manufacturing limitations. This review summarizes key nanoparticle platforms used in cancer vaccine development and discusses major barriers to their clinical translation. We also emphasize platform-selection criteria, cargo-dependent carrier design, nanoparticle size constraints, engineering strategies used to improve cytosolic delivery and endosomal escape, and the current clinical pipeline of cancer nanovaccines. Additionally, emerging strategies such as personalized nanovaccines, mRNA vaccine platforms, and combination immunotherapies are highlighted as promising approaches to improve therapeutic efficacy. These advances are expected to accelerate the clinical translation of nanotechnology-enabled cancer vaccines and support the development of next-generation cancer immunotherapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology for Cancer Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop