New Approach Methodologies for Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology

A special issue of Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304). This special issue belongs to the section "Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2025 | Viewed by 2135

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department and Graduate Institute of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan
Interests: immunotoxicology and immunopharmacology; animal drug safety assessment; non-animal methods for sensitization; computational methods for toxicology application

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan 350401, Taiwan
Interests: artificial intelligence; machine learning; database; toxicoinformatics; quantitative structure–activity relationship

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We invite researchers and experts in agrochemicals and food toxicology to contribute to our Special Issue focused on new methodologies (NAMs) regarding Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology. This Special Issue aims to explore innovative strategies that enhance the safety assessment of agrochemicals and evaluate their toxicological impacts on food products. Advancements in NAMs such as in vitro assays, omics technologies, computational modeling, and high-throughput screening offer promising alternatives to traditional animal testing. These methodologies not only enhance efficiency and cost-effectiveness, but also provide deeper insights into the toxicity mechanisms and potential hazards associated with the presence of agrochemical residues in food.

The scope of this Special Issue includes, but is not limited to, the following topics:

  1. Using NAMs to study the toxic effects of agrochemicals or food-contaminating chemicals;
  2. The development and validation of NAMs for agrochemical and food safety assessments;
  3. The application of omics technologies (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics) in food toxicology;
  4. Computational modeling for predicting agrochemical behavior and toxicity;
  5. Risk assessment of agrochemical residues in food products;
  6. Regulatory perspectives and policy implications regarding the adoption of NAMs in agrochemical and food safety assessments.

Join us in advancing the field by submitting your latest research and contributing to this timely discussion concerning the future of agrochemical and food toxicology assessments. Together, let us pave the way for safer and more sustainable agricultural practices.

Prof. Dr. Chiachi Wang
Prof. Dr. Chun-Wei Tung
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Toxics is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • new approach methodologies (NAMs)
  • agrochemicals
  • food toxicology
  • non-animal testing
  • exposure assessment:
  • regulatory acceptance
  • omics technologies
  • in silico models
  • supporting development database

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 1781 KiB  
Article
An Integrated Testing Strategy and Online Tool for Assessing Skin Sensitization of Agrochemical Formulations
by Hung-Lin Kan, Shan-Shan Wang, Chun-Lin Liao, Wei-Ren Tsai, Chia-Chi Wang and Chun-Wei Tung
Toxics 2024, 12(12), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12120936 - 23 Dec 2024
Viewed by 733
Abstract
Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization is a global trend. Recently, scientific efforts have been focused on the integration of multiple evidence for decision making with the publication of OECD Guideline No. 497 for defined approaches to skin sensitization. The integrated testing strategy (ITS) [...] Read more.
Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization is a global trend. Recently, scientific efforts have been focused on the integration of multiple evidence for decision making with the publication of OECD Guideline No. 497 for defined approaches to skin sensitization. The integrated testing strategy (ITS) methods reported by the guideline integrates in chemico, in vitro, and in silico testing to assess both hazard and potency of skin sensitization. The incorporation of in silico methods achieved comparable performance with fewer experiments compared to the traditional two-out-of-three (2o3) method. However, the direct application of current ITSs to agrochemicals can be problematic due to the lack of agrochemicals in the training data of the incorporated in silico methods. To address the issue, we present ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 for agrochemicals and agrochemical formulations using a reconfigured in silico model SkinSensPred for pesticides. Compared to ITSv2, the proposed ITS-SkinSensPred 2.0 achieved an 11% and 16% improvement in the accuracy and correct classification rate for hazard identification and potency classification, respectively. In addition, an online ITS tool was implemented and available on the SkinSensDB website. The tool is expected to be useful for evaluating skin sensitization of substances. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approach Methodologies for Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4551 KiB  
Article
A Chemometric Exploration of Potential Chemical Markers and an Assessment of Associated Risks in Relation to the Botanical Source of Fruit Spirits
by Branislava Srdjenović Čonić, Nebojša Kladar, Dejan Kusonić, Katarina Bijelić and Ljilja Torović
Toxics 2024, 12(10), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12100720 - 2 Oct 2024
Viewed by 986
Abstract
Chemometric evaluation of potentially harmful volatile compound and toxic metal(loid) distribution patterns in fruit spirits relating to distinct fruit classes most commonly used in spirit production highlighted the potential of several volatiles as candidates for differentiation markers while dismissing toxic metal(loid)s. Pome fruit [...] Read more.
Chemometric evaluation of potentially harmful volatile compound and toxic metal(loid) distribution patterns in fruit spirits relating to distinct fruit classes most commonly used in spirit production highlighted the potential of several volatiles as candidates for differentiation markers while dismissing toxic metal(loid)s. Pome fruit and grape pomace spirits were mostly characterized by a lower abundance of n-propanol, methanol, ethyl acetate and acetaldehyde, while stone fruit spirits contained lower amounts of isoamyl alcohol and isobutanol. Chemometric analysis of the fruit spirit composition of aromatics identified additional potential markers characteristic for certain fruits—benzoic acid ethyl ester, benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, butanoic acid 3-methyl-ethyl ester, butanoic acid 2-methyl-ethyl ester and furfural. This study explored the variability in the risk potential of the investigated spirits, considering that some chemicals known to be detected in spirits are potent health hazards. Ethyl carbamate in combination with acetaldehyde showed a higher potential risk in stone fruit spirits, methanol in stone and pome fruit spirits and acetaldehyde in grape pomace spirits. It is of great interest to evaluate to what extent consumers’ preference for spirits of distinct fruit types affects health risks. Consumers of stone fruit spirits are potentially at higher risk than those consuming pome fruit or grape pomace spirits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Approach Methodologies for Agrochemicals and Food Toxicology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop