Surg. Tech. Dev. 2025, 14(4), 44; https://doi.org/10.3390/std14040044 - 16 Dec 2025
Abstract
►
Show Figures
Background: Covering the defects around the calcaneus is still a largely debatable subject. In the classical view, the defects at the level of the foot can be treated only by a free flap. In a modern approach, it has been observed that
[...] Read more.
Background: Covering the defects around the calcaneus is still a largely debatable subject. In the classical view, the defects at the level of the foot can be treated only by a free flap. In a modern approach, it has been observed that for small or moderate foot defects, a local flap can be used. Methodology: In this case series, we have retrospectively selected the patients who were admitted to the orthopedic department for a calcaneal fracture and who presented soft-tissue complications during the treatment. The patients have been selected from the past five years if they have undergone reconstructive surgery with a local or regional flap. Results: By applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we found that out of 79 patients who have been admitted to the orthopedic department, only two patients met the criteria. Two flaps have been used to treat the defects that developed at the level of the calcaneus after traumatic injury of the foot. The reverse-flow sural flap, as a tunneled flap, had a good evolution, without vascular suffering of the flap. On the other hand, for defects at the medial level of the calcaneus, we have used the dorsalis pedis flap. The healing was fast, and the patient presented no complications at the level of the donor site. Conclusions: Both flaps presented a good evolution. We try to emphasize through this article that soft tissue defects around the non-weight-bearing area of the heel can also be treated through a non-microsurgical option. These two options can help the ortho-plastic team to manage difficult cases by avoiding a free flap or a split-thickness skin graft.
Full article
Figure 1
