Surgical Techniques Development

Background: Uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy has improved postoperative outcomes in lung cancer patients. Thus, thoracic surgeons are increasingly required to learn this new approach. Methods: We evaluate the path of a single surgeon switching from triportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomy to the uniportal, using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, in a single center to assess the learning curve, enrolling 107 uniportal video-thoracoscopic lobectomies consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis detected how many uniportal video-thoracoscopies occur to obtain changes in mean operation time, among all procedures consecutively performed. CUSUM analysis identified the cut-off at the 67th procedure; this value was used to divide all patients into two groups: group A (first 67 patients, early phase) and group B (40 patients, experienced phase). Then, we analyze the perioperative outcomes between the two groups. Results: Gender characteristics of the two groups were statistically similar. Median operative time decreased significantly after the early phase [188 min (IQR: 151–236) vs. 170.5 (IQR: 134–202) (p-value = 0.02)], respectively. Similarly, during the second phase, the conversions rate decreased: [10 (15%) (group A) vs. 1 (2%) (group B) (p-value = 0.04)], as did the postoperative complications [28 cases (42%) vs. 9 cases (22%) (p-value = 0.04)] and the length of stay [6 days (IQR 5–9.5) vs. 5 days (IQR 4–8) (p-value = 0.04)], giving evidence of skills acquired in the second phase. Conclusions: CUSUM analysis identified 67 uniportal lobectomies, after which operative time, conversion rate, and perioperative complications significantly decreased; the moving average analysis further supports a progressive reduction in operative time. Despite prior multiportal video-thoracoscopic experience, switching to uniportal video-thoracoscopy requires a distinct learning process.

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has rapidly emerged as a transformative tool in medicine, enabling the conversion of two-dimensional scans into highly accurate 3D models. This technology, especially when combined with artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced materials, offers numerous applications in surgical planning, simulation-based training, and patient-specific care. Methods: This review examines current literature and case studies on the use of 3D printing technology in various fields of medicine, especially in surgical specialties. Key applications include surgical planning, mock surgeries, biopsy guide creation, and customized implant fabrication across various surgical fields. Results: 3D printing is transforming surgery by enabling precise visualization of tumors and critical structures, significantly enhancing preoperative planning for conditions such as bone, soft tissue (e.g., neuroblastomas), renal, and maxillofacial tumors. In reconstruction surgeries, patient-specific 3D-printed implants ensure better anatomical compatibility, particularly in maxillofacial, neurosurgical, and vascular applications. Puncture guides improve procedural accuracy in interventions like percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Detailed anatomical models aid in simulation-based training, increasing preparedness for complex procedures. Additionally, patient-specific implants and AI-integrated decision support systems are paving the way for more personalized and efficient surgical care. Conclusions: 3D printing technology, especially when combined with AI, is reshaping modern surgery by improving both accuracy, safety, and personalized healthcare. Its applications extend across multiple specialties, offering new possibilities in surgical planning, training, and patient-specific treatments. As AI and bioprinting continue to evolve, the potential for real-time applications, such as live-printed tissue implants and enhanced decision support, could drive the next phase of innovation in various fields.

Acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas (TEF) are a rare but severe complication in post-coma neurorehabilitation patients, particularly those requiring long-term tracheostomy and enteral nutrition. Early recognition and proper surgical management are critical to prevent life-threatening outcomes and functional deterioration. However, variability in clinical presentation and the lack of standardized multidisciplinary pathways often delay referral to thoracic surgeons. We present the case of a young patient with severe traumatic brain injury, prolonged tracheostomy, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), who developed a TEF due to tracheal ischemic injury. Clinical suspicion arose from indirect signs—such as recurrent aspiration and air in the PEG system—the diagnosis was confirmed by bronchoscopy and sagittal CT imaging. Surgical planning was carried out in close collaboration between rehabilitation physicians and thoracic surgeons, based on shared criteria involving ventilator weaning, nutritional status, and clinical stability. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary, protocol-driven approach in managing TEF. Current literature supports timely but carefully selected surgical intervention, particularly in patients who are no longer ventilator-dependent, significantly reducing perioperative mortality (reported up to 60% in ventilated patients). Recent reviews advocate for standardized surgical techniques—such as single-stage repair with muscle flap interposition—and emphasize the value of early diagnosis using a combination of bronchoscopy, videofluoroscopy, and sagittal CT. We propose a structured clinical pathway integrating neurorehabilitation and thoracic surgery, aimed at optimizing timing and surgical outcomes in patients with acquired TEF. This model may serve as a foundation for future guidelines, improving both safety and efficiency in the multidisciplinary management of this complex complication.