molecules-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sample Preparation for Bioanalysis

A special issue of Molecules (ISSN 1420-3049). This special issue belongs to the section "Analytical Chemistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2021) | Viewed by 5477

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Interests: separation science (theory and applications in various scientific domains)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Bioanalysis is a huge domain of research and practice.  The analytical interest is prompted by the large variety of biomatrices and, meanwhile, the multitude of analytical techniques and materials utilized for their investigation.  Almost all of them require, prior to the analysis, a more or less complex procedure, which is known as sample preparation or sample processing.  This is very important for the entire analytical process, because the quality of the analytical data obtained from the analysis is strongly dependent on the choice of the sample preparation procedure.  This is why it is said that the sample preparation step can be considered as the “bottleneck” in bioanalysis.  Sample preparation has many roles in bioanalysis, such as improving the quality of the analysis or making the sample amenable to the core analytical process.  The sample preparation can be innovative, can be a routine procedure, can be applied to a few samples or to large scale studies, can be manual or automated, can be a more or less “green” process, can be tedious or simple, can rely on a chemical and/or physical process, and can vary in many other ways.  It is often not a surprise to see publications reporting outstanding methods or materials for sample preparation applied to the new biomatrices.  The main directions of this topic could be sample concentration, matrix simplification, chemical modification, automation, optimization, validation and any others that the authors find to be original and worthy of publication.  Owing to the large number of achievements reported in the literature, reviews with specific themes will also be highly appreciated.  In conclusion, this topical collection attempts to provide a forum for the dissemination of the newest achievements or viewpoints regarding sample preparation for bioanalytical purposes.

Prof. Dr. Victor David
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Molecules is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Bioanalysis
  • Biomatrix
  • Extractions
  • Derivatization
  • Sample clean-up
  • Sample enrichment
  • Matrix simplification
  • Chemometrics
  • Optimization
  • Validation
  • Process modeling
  • Electrochemistry
  • Spectrometry
  • Chromatography
  • Automation
  • Sources of errors

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

9 pages, 893 KiB  
Article
Analytical Problems with Preparation of Paraspinal Tissues from Patients with Spinal Fusion for Analysis of Titanium
by Jan Sawicki, Anna Danielewicz, Magdalena Wójciak, Michał Latalski, Agnieszka Skalska-Kamińska, Katarzyna Tyszczuk-Rotko and Ireneusz Sowa
Molecules 2021, 26(8), 2120; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082120 - 7 Apr 2021
Viewed by 1419
Abstract
Preparation of paraspinal tissue of patients with implants for elemental analysis is a challenge because it contains titanium in the ionic form, as well as metallic debris. Most literature reports focus on dissolving the tissue, but the impact of digestion conditions on metallic [...] Read more.
Preparation of paraspinal tissue of patients with implants for elemental analysis is a challenge because it contains titanium in the ionic form, as well as metallic debris. Most literature reports focus on dissolving the tissue, but the impact of digestion conditions on metallic debris of Ti has not been investigated. In our work, various digestion conditions, including systems, compositions of oxidising mixture, and time, were tested aiming (i) to digest the tissue without digestion of metallic titanium to quantify soluble Ti and (ii) to digest metallic titanium debris to asses total Ti content in tissue. The experiments were performed in a closed mode using a microwave-assisted system and a carbon heating block. Our study revealed that total digestion of titanium was impossible in the tested conditions and the maximal level of digested titanium was below 70%. The mineralisation with the use of concentrated nitric acid was optimal to prepare paraspinal samples to analyse the soluble titanium form because metallic titanium passivated and did not migrate to the solution. The elaborated conditions were applied to determine titanium ion in the periimplant tissue of patients with three different titanium-based surgical systems, including traditional growing rod (TGR), guided growth systems (GGS), and vertical expandable prosthesis titanium rib (VEPTR). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sample Preparation for Bioanalysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 4915 KiB  
Article
Impact of Collection Volume and DNA Extraction Method on the Detection of Biomarkers and HPV DNA in First-Void Urine
by Laura Téblick, Severien Van Keer, Annemie De Smet, Pierre Van Damme, Michelle Laeremans, Alejandra Rios Cortes, Koen Beyers, Vanessa Vankerckhoven, Veerle Matheeussen, Renee Mandersloot, Arno Floore, Chris J. L. M. Meijer, Renske D. M. Steenbergen and Alex Vorsters
Molecules 2021, 26(7), 1989; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26071989 - 1 Apr 2021
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3595
Abstract
The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has [...] Read more.
The potential of first-void (FV) urine as a non-invasive liquid biopsy for detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and other biomarkers has been increasingly recognized over the past decade. In this study, we investigated whether the volume of this initial urine stream has an impact on the analytical performance of biomarkers. In parallel, we evaluated different DNA extraction protocols and introduced an internal control in the urine preservative. Twenty-five women, diagnosed with high-risk HPV, provided three home-collected FV urine samples using three FV urine collection devices (Colli-Pee) with collector tubes that differ in volume (4, 10, 20 mL). Each collector tube was prefilled with Urine Conservation Medium spiked with phocine herpesvirus 1 (PhHV-1) DNA as internal control. Five different DNA extraction protocols were compared, followed by PCR for GAPDH and PhHV-1 (qPCR), HPV DNA, and HBB (HPV-Risk Assay), and ACTB (methylation-specific qPCR). Results showed limited effects of collection volume on human and HPV DNA endpoints. In contrast, significant variations in yield for human endpoints were observed for different DNA extraction methods (p < 0.05). Additionally, the potential of PhHV-1 as internal control to monitor FV urine collection, storage, and processing was demonstrated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sample Preparation for Bioanalysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop