Materials

Research

13 pages, 2058 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Resin-Based Bulk-Fill Composites: Tried and Tested, New Trends, and Evaluation Compared to Human Dentin

by Nicoleta Ilie

Materials 2022, 15(22), 8095; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228095 - 15 Nov 2022

Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1262

A more-and-more-accepted alternative to the time-consuming and technique-sensitive, classic, incremental-layering technique of resin-based composites (RBCs) is their placement in large increments. The so-called bulk-fill RBCs had to be modified for a higher polymerization depth and already have a 20-year history behind them. From [...] Read more.

A more-and-more-accepted alternative to the time-consuming and technique-sensitive, classic, incremental-layering technique of resin-based composites (RBCs) is their placement in large increments. The so-called bulk-fill RBCs had to be modified for a higher polymerization depth and already have a 20-year history behind them. From the initial simple mechanisms of increasing the depth of cure by increasing their translucency, bulk-fill RBCs have evolved into complex materials with novel polymerization mechanisms and bioactive properties. However, since the materials are intended to replace the tooth structure, they must be comparable in mechanical behavior to the substance they replace. The study compares already established bulk-fill RBCs with newer, less-studied materials and establishes their relationship to dentin with regard to basic material properties such as hardness and indentation modulus. Instrumented indentation testing enables a direct comparison of tooth and material substrates and provides clinically relevant information. The results underline the strong dependence of the measured properties on the amount of filler in contrast to the small influence of the material classes into which they are classified. The main difference of RBCs compared to dentin is a comparable hardness but a much lower indentation modulus, emphasizing further development potential. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2004 KiB

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Effect of Fast High-Irradiance Photo-Polymerization of Resin Composites on the Dentin Bond Strength

by Tobias Steffen, Matej Par, Thomas Attin and Tobias T. Tauböck

Materials 2022, 15(21), 7467; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217467 - 25 Oct 2022

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1292

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of conventional (10 s at 1160 mW/cm²) and fast high-irradiance (3 s at 2850 mW/cm²) light curing on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composites bonded to human dentin. Sixty-four extracted human [...] Read more.

This study investigated the influence of conventional (10 s at 1160 mW/cm²) and fast high-irradiance (3 s at 2850 mW/cm²) light curing on the micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) of bulk-fill resin composites bonded to human dentin. Sixty-four extracted human molars were ground to dentin and randomly assigned into eight groups (n = 8 per group). After application of a three-step adhesive system (Optibond FL), four different bulk-fill composites (two sculptable and two flowable composites) were placed. Of these, one sculptable (Tetric PowerFill) and one flowable (Tetric PowerFlow) composite were specifically developed for fast high-irradiance light curing. Each composite was polymerized with the conventional or the fast high-irradiance light-curing protocol. The specimens were cut into dentin-composite sticks, μTBS was determined and failure modes were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test for independent observations and one-way ANOVA. A statistical difference between the curing protocols was only found for Tetric PowerFlow, where the conventional protocol (23.8 ± 4.2 MPa) led to significantly higher values than the fast high-irradiance light-curing protocol (18.7 ± 3.7 MPa). All other composite materials showed statistically similar values for both polymerization protocols. In conclusion, the use of fast high-irradiation light curing has no negative influence on the μTBS of the investigated high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. However, it may reduce the dentin bond strength of flowable bulk-fill composite. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2723 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Aging-Dependent Changes in Mechanical Properties of the New Generation of Bulk-Fill Composites

by Danijela Marovic, Matej Par, Matea Macan, Nikolina Klarić, Iva Plazonić and Zrinka Tarle

Materials 2022, 15(3), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030902 - 25 Jan 2022

Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3663

Abstract

This study evaluated the behavior of a new generation of bulk-fill resin composites after prolonged exposure to an aqueous environment and accelerated aging in ethanol. Six bulk-fill materials were tested (Tetric PowerFill, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Fill-Up!, Tetric [...] Read more.

This study evaluated the behavior of a new generation of bulk-fill resin composites after prolonged exposure to an aqueous environment and accelerated aging in ethanol. Six bulk-fill materials were tested (Tetric PowerFill, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Fill-Up!, Tetric PowerFlow, SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable) and compared to two conventional reference materials (Tetric EvoCeram and Tetric EvoFlow). Flexural strength, modulus, and Weibull parameters were examined at three time points: 1 day, 30 days, and 30 days followed by ethanol immersion. Degree of conversion after 30 days, water sorption, and solubility up to 90 days were also investigated. Filtek One Bulk Fill had the highest flexural strength and modulus among the tested materials, followed by Tetric PowerFill and SDR plus. Flexural strength and modulus of high-viscosity bulk-fill materials showed higher stability after accelerated aging in ethanol compared to their low-viscosity counterparts and reference materials. After 30 days, the degree of conversion was above 80% for all tested materials. Dual-cure material Fill-Up! was the best-cured material. The water sorption was highest for Fill-Up!, Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative, and Tetric EvoFlow, while solubility was highest for Tetric EvoCeram. After aging in water and ethanol, new generation high-viscosity bulk-fill materials showed better mechanical properties than low-viscosity bulk-fill and conventional composites under extended light curing conditions. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2148 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Effect of Conventional Adhesive Application or Co-Curing Technique on Dentin Bond Strength

by Josipa Vukelja, Eva Klarić Sever, Ivan Sever, Silvana Jukić Krmek and Zrinka Tarle

Materials 2021, 14(24), 7664; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247664 - 12 Dec 2021

Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2636

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of two different adhesive application methods on shear dentin bond strength (ISO 29022) using three various adhesive systems. A mid-coronal section of 77 intact third human molars with fully developed apices [...] Read more.

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of two different adhesive application methods on shear dentin bond strength (ISO 29022) using three various adhesive systems. A mid-coronal section of 77 intact third human molars with fully developed apices was made to create flat bonding substrates. The materials used in the study were Excite F (Ivoclar Vivadent), Prime&Bond Universal (Dentsply Sirona) and G-Premio Bond (GC). The application of each adhesion system was performed in two different ways. In the first group, the bonding agent was light cured immediately after the application (conventional method), while in the second group the adhesive and composite were cured concurrently (“co-curing” method). A total of 180 specimens were prepared (3 adhesives × 2 method of application × 30 specimens per experimental group), stored at 37 °C in distilled water and fractured in shear mode after 1 week. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Weibull statistics. The highest bond strength was obtained for Prime&Bond conventional (21.7 MPa), whilst the lowest bond strength was observed when co-curing was used (particularly, Excite F 12.2 MPa). The results showed a significant difference between conventional and co-curing methods in all materials. According to reliability analysis, the co-curing method diminished bond reliability. Different application techniques exhibit different bond strengths to dentin. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Graphical abstract

8 pages, 1069 KiB

Open AccessArticle

by Ramona S. Oltramare, Reto Odermatt, Phoebe Burrer, Thomas Attin and Tobias T. Tauböck

Materials 2021, 14(22), 6753; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14226753 - 9 Nov 2021

Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1455

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the degree of C=C double bond conversion of high-viscosity dimethacrylate- or ormocer-based bulk-fill composites as a function of measurement depth. Four bulk-fill composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, x-tra fil, SonicFill, and Bulk Ormocer) [...] Read more.

The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the degree of C=C double bond conversion of high-viscosity dimethacrylate- or ormocer-based bulk-fill composites as a function of measurement depth. Four bulk-fill composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, x-tra fil, SonicFill, and Bulk Ormocer) and the conventional nanohybrid composite Tetric EvoCeram were applied in standardized Class II cavities (n = 6 per group) and photoactivated for 20 s at 1350 mW/cm². The degree of conversion of the composites was assessed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy at seven measurement depths (0.15, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 mm). Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). The investigated bulk-fill composites showed at least 80% of their maximum degree of conversion (80% DC_max) up to a measuring depth of at least 4 mm. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill and Bulk Ormocer achieved more than 80% DC_max up to a measuring depth of 5 mm, x-tra fil up to 6 mm. The conventional nanohybrid composite Tetric EvoCeram achieved more than 80% DC_max up to 3 mm. In contrast to the conventional composite, the investigated ormocer- and dimethacrylate-based bulk-fill composites can be photo-polymerized in thick layers of up to at least 4 mm with regard to their degree of C=C double bond conversion. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1678 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Microtensile Bond Strength of Fiber-Reinforced and Particulate Filler Composite to Coronal and Pulp Chamber Floor Dentin

by Anja Baraba, Samir Cimic, Matteo Basso, Andrei C. Ionescu, Eugenio Brambilla and Ivana Miletić

Materials 2021, 14(9), 2400; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092400 - 5 May 2021

Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1840

Abstract

This ex vivo study aimed to compare the microtensile bond strength of fiber-reinforced and particulate filler composite to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin using a self-etching adhesive system. Coronal dentin of 40 human molar teeth was exposed by cutting occlusal enamel with [...] Read more.

This ex vivo study aimed to compare the microtensile bond strength of fiber-reinforced and particulate filler composite to coronal and pulp chamber floor dentin using a self-etching adhesive system. Coronal dentin of 40 human molar teeth was exposed by cutting occlusal enamel with a low-speed saw. Teeth were then randomly divided into two groups (n = 20). The first group was left as is, while in the second group, pulp chamber floor dentin was exposed by trepanation. After placement of a self-etching adhesive system (G-aenial Bond, GC, Tokyo, Japan), groups were further divided into two sub-groups (n = 10) according to the type of composite: fiber-reinforced composite (EP, everX Posterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan) and particulate filler composite (GP, G-aenial Posterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan). Then, composite blocks were built up. Sticks (1.0 × 1.0 mm²) were obtained from each specimen by sectioning, then microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test was performed. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA test and Student’s t-test (p < 0.05). μTBS values were 22.91 ± 14.66 and 24.44 ± 13.72 MPa on coronal dentin, 14.00 ± 5.83 and 12.10 ± 8.89 MPa on pulp chamber floor dentin for EP and GP, respectively. Coronal dentin yielded significantly higher μTBS than pulp chamber floor dentin (p < 0.05), independently from the tested composites. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1964 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Rapid 3 s Curing: What Happens in Deep Layers of New Bulk-Fill Composites?

by Danijela Marovic, Matej Par, Ana Crnadak, Andjelina Sekelja, Visnja Negovetic Mandic, Ozren Gamulin, Mario Rakić and Zrinka Tarle

Materials 2021, 14(3), 515; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14030515 - 21 Jan 2021

Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2493

Abstract

This study assessed the influence of rapid 3 s light curing on the new generation of bulk-fill resin composites under the simulated aging challenge and depths up to 4 mm. Four bulk-fill materials were tested: two materials designed for rapid curing (Tetric PowerFill—PFILL; [...] Read more.

This study assessed the influence of rapid 3 s light curing on the new generation of bulk-fill resin composites under the simulated aging challenge and depths up to 4 mm. Four bulk-fill materials were tested: two materials designed for rapid curing (Tetric PowerFill—PFILL; Tetric PowerFlow—PFLW) and two regular materials (Filtek One Bulk Fill Restorative—FIL; SDR Plus Bulk Fill Flowable—SDR). Three-point bending (n = 10) was used to measure flexural strength (FS) and flexural modulus (FM). In the 3 s group, two 2 mm thick specimens were stacked to obtain 4 mm thickness, while 2 mm-thick specimens were used for ISO group. Specimens were aged for 1, 30, or 30 + 3 days in ethanol. The degree of conversion (DC) up to 4 mm was measured by Raman spectroscopy. There was no difference between curing protocols in FS after 1 day for all materials except PFLW. FM was higher for all materials for ISO curing protocol. Mechanical properties deteriorated by increasing depth (2–4 mm) and aging. ISO curing induced higher DC for PFLW and FIL, while 3 s curing was sufficient for PFILL and SDR. The 3 s curing negatively affected FM of all tested materials, whereas its influence on FS and DC was highly material-specific. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2365 KiB

Open AccessArticle

Long-Term Stability of a RAFT-Modified Bulk-Fill Resin-Composite under Clinically Relevant versus ISO-Curing Conditions

by Niklas Graf and Nicoleta Ilie

Materials 2020, 13(23), 5350; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235350 - 25 Nov 2020

Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1629

Abstract

The addition of RAFT (reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer) agents to the matrix formulation of a bulk-fill resin composite can significantly decrease the required curing time down to a minimum of 3 s. Evaluating the long term-stability of this resin composite in relation to [...] Read more.

The addition of RAFT (reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer) agents to the matrix formulation of a bulk-fill resin composite can significantly decrease the required curing time down to a minimum of 3 s. Evaluating the long term-stability of this resin composite in relation to varied curing conditions in an in-vitro environment was this study’s goal. Specimens were produced according to either an ISO or one of two clinical curing protocols and underwent a maximum of three successive aging procedures. After each one of the aging procedures, 30 specimens for each curing condition were extracted for a three-point bending test. Fragments were then stereo-microscopically characterized according to their fracture mechanism. Weibull analysis was used to quantify the reliability of each aging and curing combination. Selected fragments (n = 12) underwent further testing via depth-sensing indentation. Mechanical values for either standardized or clinical curing were mostly comparable. However, changes in fracture mechanism and Weibull modulus were observed after each aging procedure. The final procedure exposed significant differences in the mechanical values due to curing conditions. Curing conditions with increased radiant exposure seemingly result in a higher crosslink in the polymer-matrix, thus increasing resistance to aging. Yet, the clinical curing conditions still resulted in acceptable mechanical values, proving the effectiveness of RAFT-polymerization. Full article

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins)

► Show Figures

Figure 1

Journal Menu

Journal Browser

Dental Bulk-Fill Composite Resins

Share This Special Issue

Special Issue Editor

Special Issue Information

Keywords

Published Papers (8 papers)

Research

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI