jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiovascular Medicine".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 October 2026 | Viewed by 5500

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department VII, Internal Medicine II, Discipline of Cardiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2. County Emergency Hospital “Pius Brinzeu” Timisoara, Department of Cardiology, 300723 Timisoara, Romania
Interests: heart failure; systemic hypertension; acute and chronic coronary syndrome; arrhythmias; management of patients with cardiovascular diseases; cardiovascular risk factors
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

With your continuous support and high interest in the Special Issues “Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm/special_issues/91TCP5E3S2) and “Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure—2nd Edition” (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm/special_issues/UT0V9ZEL70), we managed to open the third edition. The first edition closed with 16 published articles. The second edition amassed over 10 published articles in 9 months, and we closed it without extending the deadline. Both previous editions were published as reprints. We intend to continue our effort in publishing high-quality original articles, reviews, and meta-analyses, and we hope that, with your support, the third edition will be as successful as the previous ones.

Worldwide, one of the leading causes for increased morbidity and mortality is heart failure, leading to increased costs for the healthcare systems. It evolves with repeated episodes of decompensation, representing one of the most frequent reasons for hospitalization in the cardiology or internal medicine units, but also aggravating the course of other pathologies. Even in its more stable form, chronic heart failure may affect patients' well-being and quality of life, impacting their level of activity, reducing their possibility of self-care, and also generating socio-economic consequences for the diseased persons and their families.

Over the past decade, new therapeutic methods have been developed, and the availability of specialized medical care for the general population has increased, leading to better management of patients with heart failure and to an increase in the life expectancy of these subjects. Although a variety of new treatment options are available, starting with innovative drugs and continuing with invasive procedures, not to forget the lifestyle change measures, selecting the most appropriate management of heart failure is difficult, raising challenges for the medical personnel and healthcare systems while often leading to suboptimal results for the patient.

Dr. Cristina Tudoran
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 250 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for assessment.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • acute heart failure
  • chronic heart failure
  • treatment options
  • management of heart failure
  • lifestyle changes
  • diagnosis of heart failure

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Related Special Issue

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

14 pages, 924 KB  
Article
Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction as a Marker of Vulnerability to Healthcare-Associated Infections in Coronary Care Unit Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study
by Daniela-Mirela Vîrtosu, Angela Dragomir, Simina Crișan, Silvia Luca, Oana Pătru, Ruxandra-Maria Băghină, Mihai-Andrei Lazăr, Alina-Ramona Cozlac, Stela Iurciuc and Constantin-Tudor Luca
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(5), 1789; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15051789 - 27 Feb 2026
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 366
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain an important cause of morbidity in coronary care units (CCUs). Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is central to cardiovascular risk stratification, its relationship with infection susceptibility in CCU patients is poorly defined. We explored the association between [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain an important cause of morbidity in coronary care units (CCUs). Although left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is central to cardiovascular risk stratification, its relationship with infection susceptibility in CCU patients is poorly defined. We explored the association between LVEF and HAI incidence in a real-world CCU population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 870 consecutive adult patients admitted to a tertiary CCU. Patients were stratified by LVEF into reduced (<40%) and preserved or mildly reduced (≥40%) groups. HAIs were defined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC/NHSN) criteria and required microbiological confirmation. Demographic data, comorbidities, exposure to invasive devices, colonization status and clinical outcomes were collected. Associations with HAIs were assessed using univariate and exploratory multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of the 870 patients, 235 (27.0%) had LVEF < 40%. The overall HAI incidence was 1.8% (16/870) and was significantly higher in patients with reduced LVEF compared with those with LVEF ≥ 40% (3.82% vs. 1.10%, p = 0.018). Patients with LVEF < 40% had greater exposure to invasive devices (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.52–2.79, p < 0.001). The excess HAI burden was mainly driven by urinary tract infections (1.70% vs. 0.15%, p = 0.021). Colonization rates at admission were similar between groups. In univariate analysis, reduced LVEF was associated with higher HAI occurrence, but it did not remain independently associated after adjustment. Admission infection, malignancy, CPAP use, and CCU length of stay ≥5 days emerged as independent factors in the exploratory multivariable model (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.247). Conclusions: Reduced LVEF is associated with higher HAI incidence in CCU patients, reflecting greater clinical severity, longer hospitalization, and increased exposure to invasive devices. Although not an independent predictor, LVEF appears to function as a clinically useful marker of vulnerability that may support early risk stratification and targeted infection-prevention strategies in CCU settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1259 KB  
Article
Impact of Late ARNI Initiation on Quality of Life and Functional Capacity in CRT-Treated HFrEF Patients: A Single-Centre Cohort Study
by Oana Patru, Silvia Luca, Dragos Cozma, Cristina Vacarescu, Simina Crisan, Andreea Bena, Mirela Virtosu, Adrian Sebastian Zus, Constantin Tudor Luca and Simona Ruxanda Dragan
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(4), 1617; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041617 - 19 Feb 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 553
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet many patients remain symptomatic despite long-term electrical optimization. Although sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) is central to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), data on its late initiation in patients [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a cornerstone treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet many patients remain symptomatic despite long-term electrical optimization. Although sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) is central to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), data on its late initiation in patients with chronic CRT are scarce. This study evaluated the impact of delayed ARNI initiation on clinical status, functional capacity, and cardiac remodelling in a real-world CRT population. Methods: We performed a single-centre, retrospective observational study including 76 HFrEF patients with chronic CRT who started ARNI between 2022 and late 2024. Patients underwent standardized assessment at baseline (T0) and after 12 ± 3 months (T1), including clinical evaluation, 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), symptom-limited bicycle exercise testing, and comprehensive echocardiography. The primary endpoint was change in quality of life (QoL). Secondary endpoints included exercise capacity, echocardiographic reverse remodelling, NYHA class, loop diuretic dose, and device-detected arrhythmias. Dose–response and multidimensional response patterns were explored. Results: KCCQ-12 increased from 52.96 ± 16.33 to 75.55 ± 18.12 (Δ +22.59 ± 13.22, p < 0.001), with 89.5% achieving a clinically meaningful improvement. Exercise duration and peak workload improved significantly. LVEF increased from 35.08 ± 6.96% to 43.18 ± 8.42% (Δ +8.11%, p < 0.001), with reductions in left ventricular and atrial volumes. Loop diuretic dose decreased (median −10 mg/day furosemide equivalent, p < 0.001), and 26.3% discontinued diuretics. A lower prevalence of device-detected arrhythmias was observed at follow-up, from 34.2% to 6.6% (p < 0.001). Higher ARNI doses were associated with greater likelihood of clinical, functional, and structural response. Longer CRT duration reduced the probability of structural remodelling but not symptomatic or functional benefit. Conclusions: In patients with long-standing CRT, delayed ARNI initiation was associated with improvements in QoL, exercise capacity, cardiac remodelling, congestion status, and electrical stability. These findings suggest that CRT is not a therapeutic ceiling and that late ARNI initiation remains a valuable component of comprehensive GDMT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1366 KB  
Article
The VIRTUE Index: A Novel Echocardiographic Marker Integrating Right–Left Ventricular Hemodynamics in Acute Heart Failure
by Dan-Cristian Popescu, Mara Ciobanu, Diana Țînț and Alexandru-Cristian Nechita
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8803; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248803 - 12 Dec 2025
Viewed by 653
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with phenotype-dependent prognosis. NT-proBNP is the reference biomarker, but standard echocardiographic measures (TAPSE, RV–RA gradient, LVOT VTI) offer only partial prognostic insight. The Virtue Index, defined as (RV–RA gradient)/(TAPSE × LVOT VTI), was introduced [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with phenotype-dependent prognosis. NT-proBNP is the reference biomarker, but standard echocardiographic measures (TAPSE, RV–RA gradient, LVOT VTI) offer only partial prognostic insight. The Virtue Index, defined as (RV–RA gradient)/(TAPSE × LVOT VTI), was introduced to integrate right–left ventricular interaction. This study evaluated its clinical and prognostic performance in AHF and its behavior across ejection-fraction phenotypes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 222 patients with AHF; complete data for Virtue calculation were available in 168 (99 HFrEF, 69 HFpEF) patients. HFmrEF patients were excluded from subgroup prognostic analyses. Correlation with NT-proBNP was assessed using Spearman testing with bootstrap intervals, and in-hospital mortality prediction was evaluated using ROC analysis with DeLong comparisons. Results: In HFpEF, the Virtue Index correlated moderately with NT-proBNP (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.002) and showed fair prognostic discrimination (AUC 0.704), similar to the RV–RA gradient (0.724) and higher than TAPSE or LVOT VTI. In HFrEF, correlation was weak (ρ = 0.19, p = 0.06) and predictive accuracy was modest (AUC 0.584), while LVOT VTI performed best (AUC 0.700). NT-proBNP outperformed all echocardiographic parameters in both groups. Conclusions: The Virtue Index reflects integrated hemodynamics and shows phenotype-dependent prognostic value in AHF, being more informative in HFpEF than in HFrEF. Although NT-proBNP remained superior, Virtue may complement biomarker-based risk assessment by offering a rapid, bedside estimate of short-term mortality risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2439 KB  
Article
Added Value of MAPSE to Assess LV Systolic Function in Conventional Cardiac Pacing
by Liviu Cirin, Constantin Tudor Luca, Cristina Văcărescu, Adelina Andreea Faur-Grigori, Vlad Sabin Ivan, Ciprian Dima, Roxana Buzas, Daniel-Florin Lighezan, Simina Crișan and Dragos Cozma
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(19), 6880; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196880 - 28 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1043
Abstract
Background: Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) is a simple and widely used M-mode echocardiographic marker of left-ventricular longitudinal function that correlates well with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Conventional chronic right ventricle (RV) pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, inducing [...] Read more.
Background: Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) is a simple and widely used M-mode echocardiographic marker of left-ventricular longitudinal function that correlates well with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Conventional chronic right ventricle (RV) pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction, inducing heart failure (HF) and leading to the development of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM). The aim of this study is to ascertain the clinical usefulness of MAPSE in the assessment of LV function in patients with permanent RV pacing. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional association analysis, enrolling consecutive patients with pacemakers and chronic RV pacing burdens over 20% (Vp > 20%) from 2021 to 2024. All patients were assessed by standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with LVEF and MAPSE among other parameters being assessed. We performed a correlation test using linear regression and plotted an ROC curve. Results: 409 patients (mean age = 68.7 year) were included, 225 men (55%) and 245 (59.9%) with dual-chamber pacemakers. The mean follow-up period was 18 ± 2 months, with HF incidence in the study group being 23.2%. The results showed that average, septal, and lateral MAPSE all correlate well with LVEF, but septal values seemed to provide the strongest correlation (r = 0.90, p < 0.001), and that a septal MAPSE cut off value of <10 mm (sensitivity 99.4, specificity 42.1, AUC = 0.89) was associated with impaired LVEF (<50%). Conclusions: MAPSE seems to corelate well with LVEF across the spectrum of HF in pts with chronic RV conventional pacing. Septal MAPSE shows the strongest correlation with LVEF, and a value of <10 mm is a cut-off for altered LVEF, making it a potentially useful marker of cardiac function in these pts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

17 pages, 1509 KB  
Review
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF), Pulse Wave Velocity, and Heart Rate Recovery Interconnections—A Brief Literature Review
by Bogdan-Simion Suciu, Vladiana Romina Turi, Simina Crisan, Constantin Tudor Luca, Daniela-Cornelia Lazar, Adelina Andreea Faur-Grigori, Manuela Petrescu, Andreea Dache, Flavius Cioca, Cristina Văcărescu and Dragos Cozma
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(24), 8781; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14248781 - 11 Dec 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1665
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases and remains challenging to diagnose and manage due to its complex, multifactorial nature. Increasing evidence highlights the significance of arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse wave [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases and remains challenging to diagnose and manage due to its complex, multifactorial nature. Increasing evidence highlights the significance of arterial stiffness, assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV), and autonomic dysfunction, reflected by impaired heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise, as relevant markers in HFpEF. This review aims to synthesize current knowledge on the diagnostic and prognostic value of PWV and HRR in HFpEF. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed to identify studies published between 2009 and 2025 that investigated PWV and HRR in patients with HFpEF or populations at risk. Included studies ranged from invasive hemodynamic measurements and cardiopulmonary exercise tests to large cohort analyses such as IDENTIFY-HF and MESA. Key findings were summarized in comparative tables. Results: Patients with HFpEF consistently show higher PWV than age-matched controls, supporting the concept of HFpEF as a systemic vascular disorder. Elevated PWV has been linked to increased risk of HFpEF onset and poorer outcomes. Likewise, blunted HRR indicates autonomic imbalance and is strongly associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Interventions including structured exercise training and optimized risk factor management may help improve PWV and HRR. Conclusions: PWV and HRR offer valuable, complementary insights for risk stratification and individualized care in HFpEF. Further research should focus on integrating these parameters into diagnostic algorithms and evaluating targeted therapies that address vascular stiffness and autonomic dysfunction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

24 pages, 770 KB  
Systematic Review
Digital Health Strategies in Heart Failure: Effects of Telemedicine and Remote Monitoring on Clinical Outcomes—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Dan Alexandru Surducan, Madalin-Marius Margan, Dragos-Mihai Gavrilescu, Andrei Marginean, Diana-Maria Mateescu, Ioana Cotet, Cristina Tudoran, Roxana Folescu, Mihaela-Diana Popa, Sorin Ursoniu, Costela Serban and Adrian-Cosmin Ilie
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(10), 3880; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103880 - 18 May 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring have emerged as promising strategies to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF), but prior meta-analyses reported conflicting results, partly due to insufficient differentiation between intervention modalities. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of distinct [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring have emerged as promising strategies to improve outcomes in heart failure (HF), but prior meta-analyses reported conflicting results, partly due to insufficient differentiation between intervention modalities. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of distinct telemedicine strategies on clinically relevant outcomes in HF. Methods: Conducted according to PRISMA 2020 and a prospectively registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD420261355507), this analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing telemedicine-based strategies—non-invasive telemonitoring, structured remote patient management (RPM), or haemodynamic-guided monitoring—against standard care, identified through searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL (inception to 15 March 2026). Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian–Laird) were performed, with predefined subgroup, sensitivity, and publication bias analyses. Results: Sixteen RCTs (n = 8618) were included. Telemedicine significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92; I2 = 34%; GRADE: moderate), all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71–0.88; GRADE: moderate), HF-related hospitalization (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59–0.78; GRADE: high), and composite outcomes (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.84; GRADE: moderate). A prespecified subgroup analysis revealed a significant mechanistic gradient (p for interaction = 0.008): haemodynamic-guided monitoring conferred the largest mortality reduction (RR 0.71), followed by structured RPM (RR 0.79), whereas non-invasive telemonitoring alone did not reach statistical significance (RR 0.93; p = 0.14). Conclusions: Telemedicine-based strategies yield clinically meaningful reductions in mortality and hospitalization in HF, but benefit is contingent upon intervention intensity and physiological specificity. Haemodynamic-guided monitoring and structured RPM provide robust outcome reductions, whereas passive telemonitoring alone is insufficient. These findings support consideration of structured remote patient management and haemodynamic-guided monitoring in appropriately selected patients and settings, while implementation and comparative effectiveness research remains necessary. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
22 pages, 699 KB  
Systematic Review
Effects of Biologic Therapies and Narrowband UVB Phototherapy on Vascular Inflammation and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Prospective Studies
by Ana-Olivia Toma, Daniela Crainic, Diana-Maria Mateescu, Roxana Manuela Fericean, Nicolae Ciprian Pilut, Nina Ivanovic and Daniela Vasilica Serban
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(7), 2589; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15072589 - 28 Mar 2026
Viewed by 640
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Psoriatic disease is a systemic inflammatory condition associated with increased cardiometabolic risk, but the impact of contemporary systemic therapies and narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy on vascular and systemic inflammatory markers remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to systematically synthesize prospective evidence [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Psoriatic disease is a systemic inflammatory condition associated with increased cardiometabolic risk, but the impact of contemporary systemic therapies and narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy on vascular and systemic inflammatory markers remains incompletely characterized. We aimed to systematically synthesize prospective evidence on treatment-associated changes in vascular inflammation and systemic inflammatory biomarkers in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriatic disease. Specifically, we evaluated changes assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and circulating biomarkers following biologic therapies or NB-UVB phototherapy. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL from inception to 31 January 2026 for prospective interventional and observational studies in adults with psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic agents targeting TNF-α, IL-12/23, IL-17, or IL-23, or with NB-UVB phototherapy. Eligible studies were required to report serial assessments of vascular inflammation by 18F-FDG PET/CT (typically aortic target-to-background ratio) and/or systemic inflammatory markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, TNF-α, GlycA, or hematologic indices such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) over at least 8 weeks of follow-up. We imposed no language restrictions and included only full-text, peer-reviewed prospective studies. Risk of bias was evaluated using RoB 2 for randomized trials and ROBINS-I for nonrandomized studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were prespecified for outcomes reported by at least two clinically comparable studies; however, because of substantial heterogeneity in reporting and methodology, effect estimates were summarized using a structured narrative synthesis. Results: Thirteen prospective studies (n ≈ 900 adults, published 2015–2025) met inclusion criteria, including four studies with serial 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging and one additional PET/CT study providing baseline observational data on vascular inflammation, as well as eight biomarker-focused prospective cohorts. Across randomized mechanistic trials and observational studies, biologic therapies reduced aortic target-to-background ratio by approximately 6–12% over 12–24 weeks (e.g., mean change from 2.42 to 2.18 with TNF-α inhibition and from 2.51 to 2.20 with IL-17 blockade), and no study reported worsening of PET-derived vascular indices under effective systemic treatment. Biologic and other systemic therapies produced concordant reductions in hs-CRP (typically by 30–50%), IL-6, TNF-α, GlycA, and blood-count-derived indices including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, with biomarker improvements frequently paralleling reductions in cutaneous disease activity and cardiometabolic risk markers. Two NB-UVB cohorts demonstrated significant hs-CRP reductions of roughly 20–30% and modulation of vitamin D-related inflammatory proteins, suggesting systemic anti-inflammatory effects, although these changes appeared less pronounced than with biologic therapy and were not accompanied by vascular imaging. Conclusions: Contemporary systemic psoriasis therapies, particularly biologic agents targeting the IL-23/Th17 axis and TNF-α, are associated with consistent reductions in aortic vascular inflammation and broad improvements in systemic inflammatory biomarkers, whereas NB-UVB phototherapy confers more modest but measurable systemic anti-inflammatory effects, although the current evidence does not allow differentiation between individual biologic classes in terms of magnitude of effect. Although reductions in vascular and systemic inflammatory markers were observed across therapies targeting TNF-α, IL-12/23, IL-17, and IL-23, the small number of mechanistic imaging studies and absence of head-to-head comparisons do not allow robust differentiation between biologic classes or support a uniform class effect. The convergence of imaging and biomarker data reinforces psoriasis as a clinically relevant model of inflammation-driven atherosclerosis and supports the concept that effective control of psoriatic inflammation may contribute to cardiovascular risk modification, highlighting the need for integrated cardiovascular risk assessment in routine care. However, the imaging evidence base remains limited to four small mechanistic PET/CT studies with relatively short follow-up, which constrains the strength and generalizability of conclusions regarding vascular inflammation. Larger, adequately powered, event-driven prospective trials with standardized imaging and biomarker endpoints are needed to determine whether these vascular and systemic anti-inflammatory effects translate into reduced cardiovascular events in psoriatic disease; because of methodological and reporting heterogeneity across the 13 included studies, these conclusions are based on a structured narrative synthesis rather than a formal quantitative meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420261296646. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Patients with Heart Failure: 3rd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop