- Article
15 Pages
Vibration-based condition monitoring of beam-like metallic components requires vibration modes that are both sensitive to damage and consistent across different damage locations and severities. This study evaluates the damage sensitivity of the first eight bending-mode frequencies measured from 19 aluminum-alloy 6063 cantilever beams instrumented with magnetoelastic vibration sensors. The examined configurations comprised one undamaged reference beam and 18 damaged beams combining 6 six crack-like defect locations with three defect depths. Normalized absolute frequency shifts were used to determine the mean sensitivity of each mode, its response to increasing defect depth, and the consistency of this response across the examined locations. The combined modal response increased progressively with defect depth, although the magnitude of the change depended on the selected mode and defect location. Mode f7 exhibited the highest mean sensitivity (1.234%), comparable to f5 and f6, and a monotonic-consistency ratio of C7 = 1, indicating an increasing response with defect depth at all six locations. Modes f2 and f4 also demonstrated complete monotonic consistency but lower overall sensitivity, whereas f5 showed comparatively high sensitivity with greater dependence on defect location. Mode f8 presented the lowest sensitivity and consistency. The results show that high sensitivity does not guarantee consistent depth-dependent behavior (f5), so both criteria are needed to prioritize modes. Prioritizing modes that combine high sensitivity with consistent depth-dependent behavior may simplify the processing of modal information in laboratory studies of beam-like metallic components. Because the specimens were idealized beams with a single machined defect, validation on independent specimens, realistic damage, and operational and environmental conditions is required before diagnostic thresholds or practical monitoring applications can be considered.
Industries
6 November 2026


![Schematic of the cantilever beam showing the fixed end, six defect positions, and Metglas ribbons. The inset illustrates the defect geometry ((Vw) = 1 mm, (Vh) = 0.5 mm, and CD = 1, 2, and 3 mm), while the bottom-left image shows the actual beam specimens (Adapted from [41]).](https://mdpi-res.com/industries/industries-01-00013/article_deploy/html/images/industries-01-00013-g001-550.jpg)


