energies-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Climate Policy and Negative Emissions Technologies

A special issue of Energies (ISSN 1996-1073). This special issue belongs to the section "C: Energy Economics and Policy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2021) | Viewed by 16059

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Environmental Sciences, Louisiana State University, 1002-Q Energy, Coast & Environment Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
Interests: renewable energy systems; climate policy; energy flow through human systems
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In 2015, the Paris agreement committed the world’s nations to making extraordinary changes in how they produce and consume energy. In the short term, these commitments imply that CO2 emissions need to peak by about 2025 and decline rapidly thereafter. Further, the Paris agreement implies that shortly after the middle of the century, total net emissions need to be negative, implying the removal of billions of tons of carbon dioxide via negative emissions technologies (NETs). While the technical challenges presented by the Paris commitments are considerable, the political and policy challenges are equally formidable. Energy is an input into every product used by humans, and so changes in the way we use energy will have profound implications for the rest of society. Those implications are the reason that political progress on avoiding climate change has been glacially slow.

How do we price carbon? How do we limit emissions? How do we limit hydrocarbon supply? Whose emissions and whose hydrocarbon supply do we limit? Do we compensate nations most impacted by climate change? Do we compensate individuals most impacted by decarbonization? How do we subsidize NETs? Can nations mitigate the political, and not just the biophysical impacts of climate change? None of those questions have a conclusive answer yet, but how we answer those questions will determine the history of the 21st century. Those answers are the subject of this Special Issue. 

Assist. Prof. Dr. Brian F. Snyder
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Energies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Climate policy
  • Social cost of carbon
  • Carbon dioxide removal
  • Negative emissions technology
  • Supply-side climate policy
  • Decarbonization vulnerability
  • Just transition
  • OPEC
  • Energy policy
  • Paris agreement
  • Carbon tax
  • Cap-and-trade

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 1287 KiB  
Article
Optimal Pricing, Advertising, Production, Inventory and Investing Policies in a Multi-Stage Sustainable Supply Chain
by Jia-Liang Pan, Chui-Yu Chiu, Kun-Shan Wu, Chih-Te Yang and Yen-Wen Wang
Energies 2021, 14(22), 7544; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14227544 - 11 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1326
Abstract
In this paper, the study of a sustainable production–inventory model with price and advertisement dependent on demand considering carbon emission reduction technology is investigated. The aim of this paper is to determine the optimal appropriate pricing, advertising, production, inventory, and capital investment decisions [...] Read more.
In this paper, the study of a sustainable production–inventory model with price and advertisement dependent on demand considering carbon emission reduction technology is investigated. The aim of this paper is to determine the optimal appropriate pricing, advertising, production, inventory, and capital investment decisions under various carbon emission policies to maximize the joint total profit of a multi-stage supply chain system. Various theoretical results and an algorithm are provided to verify and obtain the optimal solution of the problem. Further, the model is verified by numerical examples, and the robustness check of parameter variation is also analyzed. Finally, some management implications for decision makers are drawn from numerical examples. In summary, this study puts forward more realistic modeling hypothesis, which is beneficial to the academic research, and the research results can provide relevant decision makers with a model for managing a sustainable supply chain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Policy and Negative Emissions Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 10190 KiB  
Article
U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission Bottlenecks: Prioritization of Targets for Climate Liability
by Alexis S. Pascaris and Joshua M. Pearce
Energies 2020, 13(15), 3932; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13153932 - 01 Aug 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 9747
Abstract
Due to market failures that allow uncompensated negative externalities from burning fossil fuels, there has been a growing call for climate change-related litigation targeting polluting companies. To determine the most intensive carbon dioxide (CO2)-emitting facilities in order prioritize liability for climate [...] Read more.
Due to market failures that allow uncompensated negative externalities from burning fossil fuels, there has been a growing call for climate change-related litigation targeting polluting companies. To determine the most intensive carbon dioxide (CO2)-emitting facilities in order prioritize liability for climate lawsuits, and risk mitigation strategies for identified companies as well as their insurers and investors, two methods are compared: (1) the conventional point-source method and (2) the proposed bottleneck method, which considers all emissions that a facility enables rather than only what it emits. Results indicate that the top ten CO2 emission bottlenecks in the U.S. are predominantly oil (47%) and natural gas (44%) pipelines. Compared to traditional point-source emissions methods, this study has demonstrated that a comprehensive bottleneck calculation is more effective. By employing an all-inclusive approach to calculating a polluting entity’s CO2 emissions, legal actions may be more accurately focused on major polluters, and these companies may preemptively mitigate their pollution to curb vulnerability to litigation and risk. The bottleneck methodology reveals the discrete link in the chain of the fossil-fuel lifecycle that is responsible for the largest amount of emissions, enabling informed climate change mitigation and risk management efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Policy and Negative Emissions Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 753 KiB  
Article
How Is Mortality Affected by Fossil Fuel Consumption, CO2 Emissions and Economic Factors in CIS Region?
by Ehsan Rasoulinezhad, Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary and Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary
Energies 2020, 13(9), 2255; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092255 - 04 May 2020
Cited by 62 | Viewed by 4437
Abstract
It is widely discussed that GDP growth has a vague impact on environmental pollution due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels consumed in production, transportation, and power generation. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between economic growth, [...] Read more.
It is widely discussed that GDP growth has a vague impact on environmental pollution due to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels consumed in production, transportation, and power generation. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between economic growth, fossil fuel consumption, mortality (from cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes mellitus (DM), cancer, and chronic respiratory disease (CRD), and environmental pollution since environmental pollution can be a reason for societal mortality rate increases. This study uses the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimation technique for the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) members for the period from 1993–2018. The major results revealed that the highest variability of mortality could be explained by CO2 variability. Regarding fossil fuel consumption, the estimation proved that this variable positively affects mortality from CVD, DM, cancer, and CRD. Additionally, any improvements in the human development index (HDI) have a negative effect on mortality increases from CVD, DM, cancer, and CRD in the CIS region. It is recommended that the CIS members implement different policies to improve energy transitions, indicating movement from fossil fuel energy sources to renewable sources. Moreover, we recommend the CIS members enhance various policies for easy access to electricity from green sources and increase the renewable supply through improved technologies, sustainable economic growth, and increase the use of green sources in daily social life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Policy and Negative Emissions Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop