Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.7
3.0
Journals
Diagnostics
Special Issues
Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders
share announcement

Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 5364

Special Issue Editor

Prof. Dr. Kay Geert A. Hermann

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Radiology CCM, Charité-University Medicine, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
Interests: imaging of joints and arthritis; magnetic resonance imaging; computed tomography; plain radiography; medical e-learning; mobile learning
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Musculoskeletal disorders are currently one of the fastest-growing areas in diagnostic radiology. We delve into the intricate world of diagnosing and understanding musculoskeletal conditions through the lens of advanced imaging techniques. This Special Edition explores the latest advancements in radiological imaging, including MRI, CT, and ultrasound, and their critical role in revealing the complexities of musculoskeletal diseases. We feature cutting-edge research, clinical case studies, and expert insights that highlight the evolving landscape of imaging in this field. Whether you're a radiologist, clinician, researcher, or simply interested in the intersection of technology and healthcare, this Special Edition offers a comprehensive overview of the exciting progress in imaging musculoskeletal disease.

Prof. Dr. Kay Geert A. Hermann
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • advanced imaging techniques
  • musculoskeletal disorders
  • MRI and CT imaging
  • ultrasound imaging
  • clinical case studies
  • diagnostic accuracy

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • Reprint: MDPI Books provides the opportunity to republish successful Special Issues in book format, both online and in print.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

12 pages, 990 KiB  
Article
The Immediate Effect of a Single Treatment of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation with the StimaWELL 120MTRS System on Multifidus Stiffness in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
by Daniel Wolfe, Geoffrey Dover, Mathieu Boily and Maryse Fortin
Diagnostics 2024, 14(22), 2594; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14222594 - 19 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1352
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have altered lumbar multifidus stiffness properties compared to healthy controls. Although neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) application to the multifidus might affect stiffness, this has never been investigated. The aims of this study were to examine [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have altered lumbar multifidus stiffness properties compared to healthy controls. Although neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) application to the multifidus might affect stiffness, this has never been investigated. The aims of this study were to examine the effect of a single NMES treatment on multifidus stiffness and pain intensity in CLBP patients. Methods: 30 participants (13 male, 17 female) were randomized to one of two intervention (‘phasic’ and ‘combined’) protocols with the StimaWELL 120MTRS system. Multifidus stiffness at L4 and L5 was measured via shear-wave elastography (SWE) at rest and in standing prior to, and 15 min after, a 20 min NMES treatment. Pain intensity was measured pre- and post-treatment with the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). Results: There were significant increases in resting shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.001) and bilaterally at L5 (p = 0.017; p = 0.020) in the ‘combined’ intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at right L4 (p < 0.001). There were significant decreases in standing shear modulus at right L4 (p = 0.015) and left L5 (p = 0.036) in the ‘combined’ intervention group, and a significant between-group difference at left L5 (p = 0.016). Both groups experienced significant decreases in pain intensity (MD combined group = 1.12, 95% CI [0.34, 1.90], p = 0.011) (MD phasic group = 1.42, 95% CI [0.68, 2.16], p = 0.001). Conclusions: There were multiple significant changes in multifidus stiffness in the combined group, but not in the phasic group. Both groups experienced significant decreases in low back pain intensity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

14 pages, 1234 KiB  
Review
Diagnostic Dilemmas in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Cervical Spine Disorders: A Comprehensive Review
by Yuki Hara and Yuichi Yoshii
Diagnostics 2025, 15(2), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15020122 - 7 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1996
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical spondylosis (CS) are both common diseases, yet differentiation between the two is sometimes necessary. However, there are few evidence-based reviews on the differentiation of these conditions. This review examined the literature on the diagnosis of CTS and [...] Read more.
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical spondylosis (CS) are both common diseases, yet differentiation between the two is sometimes necessary. However, there are few evidence-based reviews on the differentiation of these conditions. This review examined the literature on the diagnosis of CTS and CS, focusing on how to distinguish between them. The analysis is divided into four categories: clinical symptoms, physical examination, diagnostic imaging, and electrodiagnosis. A total of 281 studies are reviewed, revealing a major issue: the inclusion criteria for defining each disease varies widely across studies. Understanding this limitation, the conclusion drawn is that no single clinical symptom, test, or imaging evaluation can be deemed uniquely reliable for diagnosing CTS or CS. Therefore, it is essential to apply the most up-to-date knowledge, conduct thorough examinations, and perform necessary tests for each patient to achieve a confident and accurate diagnosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

4 pages, 3127 KiB  
Interesting Images
Dynamic Ultrasound Assessment and Guided Medial Plantar Nerve Hydrodissection for Master Knot of Henry Syndrome
by Wei-Ting Wu, Levent Özçakar and Ke-Vin Chang
Diagnostics 2024, 14(20), 2266; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14202266 - 11 Oct 2024
Viewed by 1524
Abstract
A 27-year-old female presented with persistent right medial plantar pain that developed over six months following an ankle sprain. The pain, described as sharp and radiating to the toes, progressively worsened, affecting her ability to walk. An initial ultrasound examination suggested medial plantar [...] Read more.
A 27-year-old female presented with persistent right medial plantar pain that developed over six months following an ankle sprain. The pain, described as sharp and radiating to the toes, progressively worsened, affecting her ability to walk. An initial ultrasound examination suggested medial plantar nerve compression by a lipoma, prompting her referral for ultrasound-guided hydrodissection. During the pre-procedure assessment, sono-palpation (palpation using the ultrasound transducer) localized the pain to the Master Knot of Henry—where the medial plantar nerve, artery, and flexor tendons intersect. No lipoma but a normal fat pad was observed. Ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with 5% dextrose mixed with lidocaine and saline was performed. After two sessions, her pain significantly decreased, with her visual analogue scale score dropping from 8 to 5 after the first session and to 2 after the second, allowing her to resume normal activities. This case highlights the value of ultrasound in accurately diagnosing and treating conditions involving the Master Knot of Henry. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Imaging in Musculoskeletal Disorders)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-3
Back to TopTop