Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
4.7
3.0
Journals
Diagnostics
Special Issues
Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
share announcement

Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

A special issue of Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Imaging and Theranostics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 July 2025 | Viewed by 1446

Special Issue Editor

Dr. Serena Carriero

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Foundation IRCCS Cà Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy
Interests: breast radiology; interventional radiology; diagnostic radiology

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We would like to invite you to contribute to the Special Issue “Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology”. This field is rapidly evolving, driven by the development of innovative imaging techniques and minimally invasive procedures, which have significantly enhanced our ability to diagnose and treat a wide range of conditions. Diagnostic and interventional radiology plays a critical role in modern clinical practice, offering substantial benefits in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency.

This Special Issue aims to show the latest advancements in imaging technologies, interventional procedures, and clinical applications in the context of diagnostic and interventional radiology. This focus aligns with the journal’s scope by encouraging submissions that explore novel methodologies, breakthrough technologies, and innovative approaches to treatment and diagnosis. The collection of papers will highlight how these advancements are reshaping this research field and improving patient care.

In this Special Issue, original research articles and reviews are welcome. Research areas may include (but are not limited to) the following:

  • Advanced imaging techniques;
  • Innovations in minimally invasive procedures;
  • Applications of AI in radiology;
  • Image-guided therapies;
  • Emerging technologies in diagnostic radiology.

We welcome contributions that present cutting-edge research, address current challenges, and suggest future directions in this exciting and significant area of radiology.

We look forward to receiving your contributions and sharing these advancements with the broader scientific and medical community.

Best regards,

Dr. Serena Carriero
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diagnostic radiology
  • interventional radiology
  • medical imaging
  • image-guided therapy
  • AI
  • minimally invasive procedures

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 3469 KiB  
Article
Radiology Access in Rural Germany: A Nationwide Survey on Outpatient Imaging and Teleradiology
by Philipp Reschke, Leon D. Gruenewald, Vitali Koch, Jennifer Gotta, Christian Booz, Scherwin Mahmoudi, Simon Bernatz, Aynur Gökduman, Elena Höhne, Katrin Eichler, Jörg Schlüchtermann, Thomas J. Vogl and Ibrahim Yel
Diagnostics 2025, 15(8), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15080962 - 10 Apr 2025
Viewed by 335
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study examines the role of teleradiology and outpatient imaging in addressing gaps in rural radiology, analyzing the perspectives of referring physicians and radiologists. Methods: An online survey was conducted with a primary focus on evaluating the perspectives of referring physicians, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study examines the role of teleradiology and outpatient imaging in addressing gaps in rural radiology, analyzing the perspectives of referring physicians and radiologists. Methods: An online survey was conducted with a primary focus on evaluating the perspectives of referring physicians, including practicing surgeons, internists, and general practitioners. Their responses were then compared with those of radiologists. The survey consisted of multiple sections covering demographics, attitudes toward teleradiology, and outpatient imaging. It employed Likert scales, semantic differential scales, multiple-choice questions, and weighted ranking systems. Results: A total of 171 participants were included in the survey, consisting of 50 internists, 40 surgeons, 48 general practitioners, and 33 radiologists. A total of 79.2% of referring physicians rated teleradiology positively (at least 4 out of 5 stars), although its adoption in Germany remains limited, with 80.4% of referring physicians and 55.6% of radiologists reporting minimal to no use in their regions. Key concerns among referring physicians included the “lack of communication of teleradiologists with requesting physicians” (50%) and “lack of diagnostic consultations of radiologists with patients” (26.7%). In contrast, radiologists expressed significantly greater concern about technical failures (28.6% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.05). Additionally, 59.5% of referring physicians identified teleradiology as a crucial factor for improving access to radiology in rural areas. With regard to outpatient imaging, referring physicians valued continuity of care most highly, while radiologists prioritized minimizing wait times. Conclusions: Referring physicians view teleradiology and outpatient imaging as promising solutions for bridging the gap in radiology access between urban and rural areas. Addressing concerns like communication barriers and ensuring technical reliability are critical to its broader adoption and implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2400 KiB  
Article
Ultrasound-Guided Vacuum-Assisted Excision (VAE) in Breast Lesion Management: An Experimental Comparative Study of Two Different VAE Devices Across Various Aspiration Levels and Window Sizes
by Serena Carriero, Maurizio Cè, Matilde Pavan, Mariassunta Roberta Pannarale, Giulia Quercioli, Sveva Mortellaro, Alessandro Liguori, Maria Cosentino, Maria Iodice, Marta Montesano, Giulia Querques, Carolina Lanza, Salvatore Alessio Angileri, Pierpaolo Biondetti, Filippo Pesapane, Gianpaolo Carrafiello and Sonia Santicchia
Diagnostics 2025, 15(3), 272; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15030272 - 24 Jan 2025
Viewed by 835
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is a minimally invasive technique for breast tumor treatment, offering precision, comfort, and quick recovery. It is widely used for benign breast lesions and is playing an increasingly important role in the therapeutic management of non-surgical patients or [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) is a minimally invasive technique for breast tumor treatment, offering precision, comfort, and quick recovery. It is widely used for benign breast lesions and is playing an increasingly important role in the therapeutic management of non-surgical patients or patients who refuse surgery. Optimal outcomes require an understanding of device features to tailor treatment to each lesion. The Mammotome® Elite 10G operates in a fixed mode, while the Mammotome® Revolve EX 8G offers multiple aspiration levels and aperture windows for greater versatility. This study analyzed the specimen features (weight and length), comparing the weight obtained from two different VAE systems to aid the appropriate selection of a device based on the clinical setting. It also determined the number of specimens needed to achieve the 4 g diagnostic threshold. Methods: The Mammotome® Elite 10G and the Mammotome® Revolve EX were evaluated under controlled conditions. For Mammotome® Revolve EX, combinations of five aspiration levels and three aperture lengths (12 mm, 18 mm, and 25 mm) were tested. Twelve samples were collected from a chicken breast phantom for each setting. Specimen weights and the minimum excisions required to reach the 4 g threshold were analyzed. Results: The mean weight per sample for the Mammotome® Elite 10G was 0.16 ± 0.04 g. For the Mammotome® Revolve EX, the weights increased with aperture size and aspiration level, ranging from a minimum of 0.132 ± 0.028 g (a window length of 12 mm and aspiration level 1) to a maximum of 0.407 ± 0.055 g (a window length of 25 mm and aspiration level 5). The 25 mm window at aspiration level 5 achieved the 4 g threshold in as few as 10 samples. By comparison, the Mammotome® Elite required up to 26 samples. Conclusions: Compared to the Mammotome Elite, Mammotome® Revolve EX offers superior versatility and efficiency, reducing patient discomfort by minimizing the required samples. Its technical advantages make it a valuable tool for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-2
Back to TopTop