Hospitals, Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2026) – 7 articles

Background: Patient safety is evaluated using both internal assessments of safety culture and external hospital rating systems; however, the extent to which these measures capture related dimensions of patient safety remains uncertain. Methods: This study examined the association between hospital patient safety culture ratings and hospital safety grades. Using 2024 hospital-level data, patient safety culture was measured using the overall safety rating from the AHRQ Hospital Survey on patient safety culture and hospital safety grades derived from Leapfrog Safety Grades. Results: No significant association was observed between patient safety culture ratings and the likelihood of receiving higher Leapfrog Grades. Hospital bed size, however, was significantly associated with Leapfrog Grades, with larger hospitals demonstrating lower odds of receiving higher grades. Conclusions: These findings indicate that further research is needed to assess congruence between internal perceptions of patient safety culture and external hospital safety ratings. The results underscore potential measurement differences between federal survey-based assessments and private nonprofit grading methodologies and suggest caution in assuming equivalence across patient safety metrics. Further research is warranted to clarify how these tools align and to determine their respective roles in evaluating hospital patient safety. Full article

Preventing inpatient falls remains challenging for healthcare institutions globally, including in Singapore. Integrating technological innovations into fall prevention measures may optimize inpatient care and improve health outcomes. A multiphase study was conducted from 2019 to 2022, employing a human-centred design (HCD) approach to develop a technology-based inpatient fall prevention system (IFPS). The four phases include (1) pre-design observations and focus groups, (2) feature prioritization and wireframe development, (3) prototype testing and safety assessments, and (4) post-design staff training and feedback collection. The developed IFPS integrated artificial intelligence (AI) video analytics for bed-exit prediction with communication devices and autonomous commode delivery to facilitate ward communication and reduce staff workload. This paper describes the development process and user evaluation of the IFPS to assess its operational usability and safety. Potential users of the IFPS, such as ward nurses and patients, suggested features for the IFPS during the pre-design phase and thereafter evaluated the system through focus group discussions and/or feedback surveys. Pre-design focus group participants (n = 24) emphasized durability and user-friendliness requirements, informing system design. When evaluating the system, nurse users (n = 39) perceived the IFPS as effective in reducing falls (65%), enabling them to perform other duties (85%), and allowing them to remain with patients without searching for a commode (64%). Patient users (n = 21) found pre-recorded messages effective (91%), though communication clarity varied. Engaging healthcare workers in IFPS development offered valuable context-based insights, highlighting the importance of addressing technology acceptance factors early to promote adoption of fall prevention technologies in acute care settings. Full article

This study analyzed environmental noise levels in neonatal hospital units, including both low- and high-risk nurseries, as well as neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Continuous 24 h measurements over ten days revealed that average sound levels significantly exceeded international recommendations. Hourly $L_{Aeq}$ values frequently reached or surpassed 65 dB, with over 20% of daily recordings exceeding this limit, and in some instances, more than 50%. Heatmaps indicated consistent noise patterns: high-risk nurseries experienced peaks during late morning and afternoon, low-risk nurseries at night, while NICU maintained elevated levels throughout the day. The main sources of noise included alarms, medical equipment, and activity from staff or visitors. This highlights the need for hospital policies aimed at protecting the neurosensory health of neonates. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for creating quieter environments in neonatal care. Full article

This study explores how hospital location (rural/non-rural) may moderate the nurse staffing ratio’s impact on three hospital-acquired infections. This study used data from 2022 to 2024 on nurse staffing and hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and data on hospital-acquired infection rates from the Medicare Care Compare dataset provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. After removing missing values, the final dataset included 7997 hospital-year observations across the US. Independent variables include rural hospital designation, nursing hours per patient day, and RN FTE per adjusted day. The dependent variables included infection rates of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection, Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple regression was performed in Stata 18. Our research found that across all three infection types, an increase in nursing hours per patient day is significantly associated with a decrease in the infection rate, and that impact was not moderated by hospital rurality. Extra time spent with patients in either a rural or non-rural hospital decreased hospital-acquired infection rates. While RN FTEs were included in the model, total nursing hours per patient day emerged as the more consistent predictor of lower hospital-acquired infection rates. Full article

Healthcare systems operate in safety-critical environments where rapid adaptation and sustained functioning must occur simultaneously, yet existing safety frameworks tend to conceptualise agility and resilience as separate, sequential, or retrospective capabilities. This conceptual separation limits understanding of how safety is enacted during disruption, when healthcare workers and organisations must respond in real time without temporal or structural buffers. This paper introduces agilience as an emerging conceptual construct that captures the concurrent enactment of agility (rapid adaptation) and resilience (sustained functioning, recovery, and learning) under conditions of uncertainty. Drawing on safety science, resilience engineering, organisational theory, and comparative industry literature, this conceptual commentary clarifies how agilience extends existing Safety-I and Safety-II paradigms by addressing the temporal gap between prevention-focused and learning-focused approaches. Agilience is positioned as both an explanatory lens and an aspirational organisational state, highlighting the alignment required between individual adaptive capability and organisational structures to support safe, sustainable care delivery. The paper outlines the defining features, boundaries, and system conditions under which agilience becomes visible, and illustrates its relevance through healthcare examples. By articulating agilience as a distinct conceptual contribution, this work provides a foundation for future empirical investigation, measurement development, and application in healthcare safety management. Full article

Health systems face pressure to strengthen resilience against supply chain disruptions while maintaining cost-effective service delivery. This mixed-methods study describes a pilot project that integrated 3D printing services into a Canadian provincial health authority. Quantitative data were derived from internal clinical engineering work orders, where a scenario-based economic analysis compared original equipment manufacturer (OEM) procurement with modelled 3D-printed parts. Using conservative assumptions, selected non-electronic structural parts were assigned a fixed unit cost. Qualitative data were collected from two focus groups with clinical engineers and other end-users. Results from an exploratory scenario-based economic analysis suggest that substituting selected structurally simple clinical engineering parts with 3D-printed alternatives would be associated with modelled cost impacts ranging from a 67.4% net increase (OEM prices halved and 3D-printing costs doubled) to a 69.6% cost reduction (OEM prices increased by 10% and 3D-printing costs decreased by 20%). Demand changes affected absolute savings but not the percent difference (58.1% under ±50% quantity changes), and a pessimistic procurement scenario (OEM prices decreased by 30% and 3D-printing costs increased by 50%) reduced savings to 10.3%. Focus groups highlighted perceived benefits and implementation challenges associated with integrating additive manufacturing. Implementation was facilitated through an outsourcing model, which was perceived to shift certain responsibilities and risk-management functions to the vendor. Long-term adoption will require clearer communication and targeted education. This pilot study suggests that, under constrained regulatory scope and scenario-based assumptions, additive manufacturing may contribute to supply chain resilience and may be associated with modelled cost advantages for selected low-risk components. Full article

Effective communication in critical care units, such as the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU), is vital for patient safety; however, clinical notes from multiple professionals are often lengthy and complex. This study evaluated the Mistral large language model for summarizing Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit progress notes using the Illness severity, Patient summary, Action list, Situation awareness and contingency planning, and Synthesis by receiver (I-PASS) framework, a standardized mnemonic for patient handoffs in healthcare. A total of 385 patients were included in the cohort, and all the progress notes associated with each patient were combined into a single document and summarized by the model. The readability was assessed using multiple metrics, including Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning-Fog Index, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Automated Readability Index, and Dale-Chall Score. The readability metrics showed that the summaries generated with the Mistral Large Language Model (LLM) were much more difficult to read than the original notes, requiring a higher reading level. In a small clinician review, junior residents rated the summaries overall more favorably than senior residents, who often identified missing clinical details. Although Mistral condensed the documentation, this reduced readability and some loss of context may limit its usefulness for clinical handoffs. As a preliminary study with a small clinician-reviewed sample, these findings are descriptive and will require validation in larger clinical settings. Full article