Previous Article in Journal
Microplastics in Agroecosystems: Pathways, Plant Uptake Mechanisms, and Advanced Scanning Techniques for Detection in Plant Tissues
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Detection of Nanoplastics in Marine Environments: Current Methods and Future Perspectives

by
Sabela Fernandez-Sanchez
1,
Maria Garcia-Marti
1,2,
Jesus Simal-Gandara
1,2 and
Juan C. Mejuto
2,3,*
1
Department of Analytical and Food Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain
2
Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur).SERGAS-UVIGO, Agricultural and Food Research Group (AA1), 32004 Ourense, Spain
3
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microplastics 2026, 5(2), 121; https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020121 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 May 2026 / Revised: 9 June 2026 / Accepted: 10 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026

Abstract

In recent decades, plastic consumption has risen across various industries and everyday products, leading to greater plastic use and the generation of waste, which results in the leaching of micro- and nanoplastics into the environment. This review summarizes recent analytical methods for the detection of nanoplastics (NPs) in several marine matrices, divided into three main stages: extraction, separation, and identification. The literature reviewed indicates that chemical and enzymatic digestion are the most commonly used procedures for the extraction step. For the separation step, flotation, filtration, and centrifugation are the most used techniques. Finally, two groups of techniques may be used for the identification step. The first category consists of methods used for qualitative identification, with spectroscopic methods such as Raman and FTIR being the most frequently used. The second category comprises those used for the quantitative analysis of NPs, where fluorescence-based methods and nanoparticle tracking analysis are increasingly used for this assessment. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, such as matrix interferences caused by salinity and organic matter, low environmental concentrations of NPs, and the lack of standardized protocols. This review highlights the need for standardized protocols, validated reference materials, and integrated multi-technique approaches to improve the comparability of nanoplastics measurements in marine environments.
Keywords: nanoplastics; marine environment; detection; extraction; separation; identification methods nanoplastics; marine environment; detection; extraction; separation; identification methods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernandez-Sanchez, S.; Garcia-Marti, M.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Mejuto, J.C. Detection of Nanoplastics in Marine Environments: Current Methods and Future Perspectives. Microplastics 2026, 5, 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020121

AMA Style

Fernandez-Sanchez S, Garcia-Marti M, Simal-Gandara J, Mejuto JC. Detection of Nanoplastics in Marine Environments: Current Methods and Future Perspectives. Microplastics. 2026; 5(2):121. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernandez-Sanchez, Sabela, Maria Garcia-Marti, Jesus Simal-Gandara, and Juan C. Mejuto. 2026. "Detection of Nanoplastics in Marine Environments: Current Methods and Future Perspectives" Microplastics 5, no. 2: 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020121

APA Style

Fernandez-Sanchez, S., Garcia-Marti, M., Simal-Gandara, J., & Mejuto, J. C. (2026). Detection of Nanoplastics in Marine Environments: Current Methods and Future Perspectives. Microplastics, 5(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics5020121

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop