Medical laboratories are perhaps the largest measurement industry in the world. The metrology terminology is relevant for effective and efficient communication, particularly where metrology activities are carried out by operators with different metrology skills. The World Association of Societies of Pathology and Laboratory
[...] Read more.
Medical laboratories are perhaps the largest measurement industry in the world. The metrology terminology is relevant for effective and efficient communication, particularly where metrology activities are carried out by operators with different metrology skills. The World Association of Societies of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (WASPaLM) and SIPMeL have had some opportunities to propose changes to the documents in preparation for the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the ISO/TC 212 in order to harmonize the terminology with the Metrology Vocabulary (VIM) of the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM). Many proposals have been accepted. Here, we summarize some particularly critical points for metrological terms. The main terms discussed are the following: measuring, measuring range, examination, pre-examination, post-examination, manufacturer, measuring instrument, quantitative, qualitative, semi-quantitative, processing, measurement error, maximum permissible error of measurement, total error of measurement, monitoring, variability, performance, reliability, influence, interference, selectivity, sensitivity, detection limit, reliability, comparability, compatibility, control material. Despite all the efforts to coordinate terminologies, it is inevitable that overlapping and inconsistent terminologies will continue to be used because documents and policies are produced in different contexts. In some ISO/TC 212 and CLSI documents, the phenomenon of magnetic attraction toward common words (such as “analysis” and derivatives), without any consideration of the true metrological meaning, is noted. The ISO/TC 212 and CLSI working groups show, alongside moments of openness, phenomena of true self-referential conservatism.
Full article