Next Article in Journal
An Aggregation Method for Evaluating the Performance of a Production Line Operating Under the Slowdown Policy
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond the Museum: Virtual and Physical Replicas of Pompeii’s Siege Marks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Spiros Pantelakis
1,*,
Andreas Strohmayer
2 and
Nikolaos Michailidis
3
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
All papers published in this volume are presented at the 14th EASN International Conference on “Innovation in Aviation & Space towards sustainability today & tomorrow” (EASN 2024), Thessaloniki, Greece, 8–11 October 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2025, 90(1), 116; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090116
Published: 30 May 2025
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the Volume Editors of the proceedings would like to certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review by the designated expert referees and were administered by the Volume Editors strictly following the policies announced on the conference website [1].
The whole process was supervised by the conference committee and the Volume Editors and adhered to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by MDPI and complied with the peer review policy and guidelines of Engineering Proceedings, which can be found at the following link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/engproc/instruction_for_conference_organizers. The review reports were checked and archived by the Editorial Office of Engineering Proceedings.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: Conference Submission Platform/Email
  • Number of submissions received: 141
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 141
  • Number of submissions accepted: 114
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 80%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.72
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 60

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Reference

  1. Publication Policy Overview of the EASN Conferences. Available online: https://easnconference.eu/2024/GeneralInformation.html (accessed on 30 May 2025).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pantelakis, S.; Strohmayer, A.; Michailidis, N. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2025, 90, 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090116

AMA Style

Pantelakis S, Strohmayer A, Michailidis N. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 90(1):116. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090116

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pantelakis, Spiros, Andreas Strohmayer, and Nikolaos Michailidis. 2025. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 90, no. 1: 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090116

APA Style

Pantelakis, S., Strohmayer, A., & Michailidis, N. (2025). Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings, 90(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090116

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop