Open AccessReview
Applications of Adipose Tissue Micrografts (ATM) and Dermis Micrografts (DMG) in Wound Healing: A Scoping Review of Clinical Studies
by
Konstantinos Zapsalis, Orestis Ioannidis, Elissavet Anestiadou, Maria Pantelidou, Konstantinos Siozos, Christos Xylas, Georgios Gemousakakis, Angeliki Cheva, Chryssa Bekiari, Antonia Loukousia, Savvas Symeonidis, Stefanos Bitsianis, Manousos-Georgios Pramateftakis, Efstathios Kotidis, Ioannis Mantzoros and Stamatios Angelopoulos
Viewed by 578
Abstract
Adipose tissue micrografts (ATM) and dermis micrografts (DMG) have emerged as promising autologous therapies in regenerative wound care, leveraging mechanically disaggregated cell–matrix constructs to modulate the wound microenvironment and promote tissue repair. This scoping review systematically analyzed clinical studies investigating ATMs and DMGs
[...] Read more.
Adipose tissue micrografts (ATM) and dermis micrografts (DMG) have emerged as promising autologous therapies in regenerative wound care, leveraging mechanically disaggregated cell–matrix constructs to modulate the wound microenvironment and promote tissue repair. This scoping review systematically analyzed clinical studies investigating ATMs and DMGs in acute and chronic wounds. Eight studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series, were identified, involving diverse wound types such as burns, ulcers, surgical dehiscence, and posttraumatic defects. All interventions utilized mechanical disaggregation (Rigenera
® system) to produce micrografts, which were applied via perilesional injection, scaffold-assisted delivery, or topical administration. Outcomes consistently demonstrated accelerated re-epithelialization, enhanced angiogenesis, improved scar remodeling, and low complication rates. In select studies, micrografts were combined with platelet-rich fibrin or stromal vascular fraction, suggesting potential synergistic effects. While one randomized trial showed superior healing outcomes with DMGs over collagen scaffolds, others yielded mixed results, likely reflecting heterogeneity in methodology and outcome measures. Overall, the available clinical evidence supports the safety, feasibility, and biological activity of micrograft-based therapies. However, larger, standardized, and mechanistically driven studies are required to validate their efficacy and define optimal protocols across wound etiologies.
Full article
►▼
Show Figures