Skip to Content

Bioengineering

Bioengineering is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on the science and technology of bioengineering, published monthly online by MDPI. 

Indexed in PubMed | Quartile Ranking JCR - Q2 (Engineering, Biomedical)

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (6,058)

Accurate measurement of spinal metrics is critical for diagnosing and treating spinal disorders. However, discrepancies between X-ray and ultrasound imaging data pose a challenge in standardizing clinical assessments. This study introduces a novel methodology that combines geometric scaling factors and extrapolation techniques to align spinal metrics from X-ray and ultrasound modalities. Data were collected from fifteen healthy adult volunteers (8 males, 7 females) aged from early adulthood to middle age, all without a history of low back pain, who underwent a standardized chiropractic traction protocol. X-ray imaging was performed pre-procedure, and ultrasound imaging was conducted both pre-procedure and during the procedure at the L3–L4, L4–L5, and L5–S1 levels under graded traction forces (1.8 kg, 3.6 kg, 5.4 kg, and 11.3 kg). Extrapolation methods were applied to standardize measurements across pre- and during-procedure conditions. Significant findings include consistent increases in spinal metrics, such as height and area, indicating positive elongation and flexibility under progressive weights. The integration of these methods bridges the gap between static and real-time imaging data, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and leads to clinical relevance. This proof-of-concept study lays the groundwork for developing standardized spinal imaging protocols and adapting the methodology to broader imaging applications for improved patient outcomes.

12 March 2026

End-to-end analytical workflow for multimodal spinal measurement analysis integrating X-ray and ultrasound imaging. The workflow illustrates the sequential phases of data acquisition, annotation, geometric scaling, extrapolation and statistical modeling, AI-assisted interpretation, and bias governance.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, and post-lung trans-plantation are often accompanied by skeletal muscle dysfunction that worsens the quality of life. Such physiological changes are driven by physical inactivity, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, anabolic and hormonal resistance, and medication effects. Structural changes include impaired capillarization, fiber-type shifts (slow-to-fast in limb muscle and fast-to-slow in respiratory muscles), mitochondrial dysfunction, reduced oxidative capacity, and early lactate accumulation. Electromyography and dynamometry, both isokinetic and isometric, quantify neuromuscular drive through measuring strength, power, and endurance and are associated with functional outcomes (6-min walk, sit-to-stand, stair climbing tests). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves neuromuscular efficiency, dyspnea, exercise tolerance, and quality of life by combining resistance, endurance, and eccentric training. The effects of PR generally plateau at three months, emphasizing the need for maintenance and the personalization of rehabilitation plans. While nutritional optimization is important, supplements have shown little benefit. Future priorities include defining EMG/dynamometry thresholds to allow standardized routine testing for comparable benchmarks and more precise PR protocols. Future research targeting mitochondrial remodeling, inflammatory signaling, and anabolic resistance offer potential pathways for preventing and reversing muscle wasting.

12 March 2026

Skeletal muscle dysfunction in COPD arises from systemic inflammation, corticosteroid use, hypoxemia, oxidative stress, physical inactivity, nutritional depletion, and comorbidities. This leads to impaired mitochondria function, fiber-type shifts, muscle atrophy, and ultimately reduced strength and endurance that contributes to dyspnea and exercise intolerance [56,58,59,60,61].

The goal of this paper was to determine the efficacy of the surgical treatment of two-wall peri-implant defects filled with L-PRF/xenograft block in the reduction of peri-implant marginal bone levels after 12 months. Ten patients with two-wall peri-implant defects were included. Patients received presurgical treatment followed by a surgical reconstructive intervention with bone blocks obtained by mixing bovine origin xenogeneic bone graft grains with L-PRF membranes. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for oral hygiene and disease relapse evaluation and assessment of the primary outcome marginal bone levels (MBL) and clinical outcome variables such as probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and mucosal recession. Data was analyzed for changes between baseline and the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. Mean MBL was 5.1 ± 1.7 mm and 1.58 ± 0.92 mm at baseline and 6 months after the procedure, indicating a statistically significant decrease (p = 0.0005). At 12 months post-surgery, marginal bone levels remained stable at 1.8 ± 0.9 mm, with no statistically significant difference from the previous evaluation (p > 0.05). From baseline to 6 months there was also a statistically significant decrease in PD (from 8.07 ± 1.51 mm to 3.33 ± 0.59, p < 0.0001) and BOP (from 60.0% to 13.0% of affected surfaces, p < 0.001). No changes were observed from the intermediate to the 12-month follow-up (p > 0.05 for all variables).

12 March 2026

Representative case of the surgical treatment of two-wall peri-implant defects with L-PRF bone blocks. (a) Initial situation; (b) peri-implant defect; (c) implant surface debridement with titanium curette; (d) implant surface debridement with air-flow; (e) L-PRF membranes; (f) chopping of the L-PRF membrane to mix with xenograft; (g) L-PRF block (L-PRF membranes with xenograft); (h) occlusal view of the L-PRF block placed in the peri-implant defect; (i) L-PRF membrane covering the palatal L-PRF block; (j) occlusal view of both buccal and palatal L-PRF membranes; (k) occlusal placement of the L-PRF membrane over the the peri-implant defect. (l) occlusal view of the final suture.

Background: Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) presents an increasing clinical challenge with higher failure rates than primary reconstruction. However, the evolving research landscape and clinical evidence regarding key biomechanical risk factors remain incompletely synthesized. Methods: A sequential dual methodological approach was applied. First, a bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science Core Collection was performed to map global research trends and identify emerging hotspots. Based on the identified hotspot, a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was subsequently conducted. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were synthesized using random-effects models in R. Results: The bibliometric analysis included 4213 publications and demonstrated exponential growth in revision ACLR research, identifying posterior tibial slope (PTS) as the dominant research hotspot. A meta-analysis of 11 studies involving 299 patients showed significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes and objective knee stability measures, along with a mean PTS reduction of 8.72° (95% CI 7.84–9.60; p < 0.001), while no significant change in patellar height was observed. The pooled return-to-sport rate was 74% (95% CI 64–82%), and the most common complications were symptomatic hardware and postoperative recurvatum. Conclusions: PTS has emerged as a key focus in revision ACLR research, and addressing this biomechanical factor may be associated with improved functional and radiographic outcomes. However, current evidence is mainly derived from retrospective studies, and further prospective research is needed to confirm long-term efficacy and refine surgical indications.

12 March 2026

Distribution and trends in ACLR revision surgery research. (a) Publication output distribution and trends over time. The red dashed line represents the trend line (y = 60.66231 − 7.00739x + 0.7938x2). (b) Phases of publication output in ACLR revision surgery research. The asterisk indicates that the slope is significantly different from zero at the α = 0.05 level. Final selected model: 1 joinpoint. The green bar represents the number of publications in 2025, which was not included in the Joinpoint regression analysis.

News & Conferences

Issues

Open for Submission

Editor's Choice

Reprints of Collections

Biomechanics and Motion Analysis
Reprint

Biomechanics and Motion Analysis

Editors: Christina Zong-Hao Ma, Hong Fu
Biomechanics-Based Motion Analysis, Volume II
Reprint

Biomechanics-Based Motion Analysis, Volume II

Editors: Christina Zong-Hao Ma, Hong Fu
XFacebookLinkedIn
Bioengineering - ISSN 2306-5354