Next Article in Journal
Empirical Restructuring of Planning Education Under Spatial Data Science Intervention
Previous Article in Journal
Cariño Competence in STEM: Women of Color Leadership as Cultural Intuition Praxis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Impact of AI Identity on University Students’ Research Creativity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Dilemmas: An Ambidextrous Learning Perspective

1
Business School, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
2
College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
3
Youth League Committee, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2026, 16(6), 931; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060931 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 22 April 2026 / Revised: 3 June 2026 / Accepted: 8 June 2026 / Published: 11 June 2026

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has been effectively integrated into every stage of undergraduate research, significantly improving students’ learning efficiency. Against this backdrop, artificial intelligence is no longer merely an optional external tool, but has become an extension of college students’ personal capabilities—that is, “AI identity.” The study constructs a moderated dual-mediation model from the perspective of ambidextrous learning. Moving beyond prior work on AI usage frequency or literacy, this study centers on AI identity and reveals the double-edged effect of AI identity on research creativity, with a positive indirect effect via exploratory learning and a negative indirect effect via exploitative learning, along with the asymmetric moderating role of ethical dilemmas on these two pathways. Using questionnaire surveys analyzing 451 college student responses, the results demonstrate that AI identity positively correlates with research creativity, where exploratory learning serves as a positive mediator while exploitative learning acts as a negative mediator. Ethical dilemmas moderate the relationship between AI identity and ambidextrous learning. These findings provide actionable insights for higher education institutions to foster students’ exploratory AI use, mitigate overreliance, and establish ethical governance frameworks for AI-assisted research, thereby assisting universities in guiding students toward developing a healthy understanding of AI identity and refining ethical guidelines for AI applications.
Keywords: AI identity; ambidextrous learning; ethical dilemmas; research creativity AI identity; ambidextrous learning; ethical dilemmas; research creativity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, L.; Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y. The Impact of AI Identity on University Students’ Research Creativity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Dilemmas: An Ambidextrous Learning Perspective. Educ. Sci. 2026, 16, 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060931

AMA Style

Yang L, Chen L, Liu C, Li M, Zhang Y. The Impact of AI Identity on University Students’ Research Creativity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Dilemmas: An Ambidextrous Learning Perspective. Education Sciences. 2026; 16(6):931. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060931

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Long, Lili Chen, Chao Liu, Menghan Li, and Yuxiang Zhang. 2026. "The Impact of AI Identity on University Students’ Research Creativity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Dilemmas: An Ambidextrous Learning Perspective" Education Sciences 16, no. 6: 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060931

APA Style

Yang, L., Chen, L., Liu, C., Li, M., & Zhang, Y. (2026). The Impact of AI Identity on University Students’ Research Creativity and the Moderating Role of Ethical Dilemmas: An Ambidextrous Learning Perspective. Education Sciences, 16(6), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16060931

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop