Next Article in Journal
Venues for Analytical Reasoning Problems: How Children Produce Deductive Reasoning
Previous Article in Journal
Sport and Its Relationship with Oncology in Future Primary Education Teachers
Open AccessArticle

For a Healthy (and) Higher Education: Evidences from Learning Outcomes in Health Sciences

1
Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Portuguese Catholic University, Rua de Camões 60, 4710-362 Braga, Portugal
2
Research Centre for Human Development (CEDH), Portuguese Catholic University, Rua de Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal
3
Centre for Research in Higher Education Policies (CIPES), Rua 1º Dezembro 399, 4450-227 Matosinhos, Portugal
4
Department of Mathematics (DM. UTAD), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
5
UFP Energy, Environment and Health Research Unit (FP-ENAS), University Fernando Pessoa (UFP), Praça 9 de Abril 349, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
6
University Europeia, Quinta do Bom Nome, Estr. da Correia 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2020, 10(6), 168; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060168
Received: 3 May 2020 / Revised: 14 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020 / Published: 24 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Curriculum and Instruction)
Increased recognition of outcomes, or competency-based education, has evolved across higher education on health sciences. However, there is significant diversity in the current study of Portuguese programmes. Considering learning outcomes (LO) as indicators of knowledge, skills, abilities, attitudes and the understanding that the student will gain as a result of an educational experience, this study aims to explore which LO are emphasised on the study programmes of health sciences in Portugal. Through a qualitative methodology, carried out through MAXQDA software, all LO of all Portuguese health sciences study programmes submitted to quality accreditation to the Portuguese Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES) since 2009 until 2016 were analysed. Although specific knowledge was the most referenced LO, transversal skills were also emphasized, such as critical and reflexive analysis/critical thinking, research, ability to organize and plan and professional ethics. Significant differences were found between LO selection when the analysis was made by comparing the diverse study programmes. This required assortment of knowledge and skills seems to reflect not only the specificities of each health science programme but also the challenging demands on professionals in the 21st century, along with the necessary changes imposed by society, fostering intercultural understanding, tolerance, mutual respect and an ethic of global citizenship and shared responsibility, crucial enablers of educational development for all in the scope of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. View Full-Text
Keywords: learning outcomes (LO); health sciences; health education; higher education; competences; skills; Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES) learning outcomes (LO); health sciences; health education; higher education; competences; skills; Agency for Assessment and Accreditation of Higher Education (A3ES)
MDPI and ACS Style

Leite, Â.; Soares, D.; Sousa, H.F.P.; Vidal, D.G.; Dinis, M.A.P.; Dias, D. For a Healthy (and) Higher Education: Evidences from Learning Outcomes in Health Sciences. Educ. Sci. 2020, 10, 168.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop