Joint Selection for Growth and Leaf Color in Superior Trees of Sapium discolor in Fujian Province, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Site Description
2.1.1. Site 1: Shunchang County, Nanping City, Fujian Province
2.1.2. Site 2: Jianle County, Sanming City, Fujian Province
2.1.3. Site 3: Nanjing County, Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province
2.2. Plant Materials
2.3. Experimental Design and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Phenotypic Variation Analysis
3.2. Genetic Variation Analysis
3.3. Selection of Clonal Candidate Trees
4. Discussion
4.1. Growth Traits
4.2. Leaf Color Traits
5. Concluding Remarks
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xie, W.Z. Quanguo Zhongcaoyao Huibian; People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1996; p. 59. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, J.S.; Tseng, Y.C. Flora Republicae Popularis Sinicae (Zhongguo Zhiwu Zhi); Science Press: Beijing, China, 1997; Volume 44, p. 18. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, G.J.; Pan, Q.M.; Zhang, Y.L.; Liao, H.B.; Yang, Y.Q.; Hou, Y.; Liang, D. Coumarinolignoids and taraxerane triterpenoids from Sapium discolor and their inhibitory potential on microglial nitric oxide production. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 2251–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zhang, Y.L.; Pan, Q.M.; Liao, H.B.; Qin, J.K.; Li, N.; Liang, D.; Zhang, G.J. Coumarinolignoids and lignanoids from the stems and leaves of Sapium discolor. Fitoterapia 2019, 133, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Loehle, C.; Namkoong, G. Constraints on tree breeding: Growth tradeoffs, growth strategies, and defensive investments. For. Sci. 1987, 33, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Namkoong, G.; Kang, H.C.; Brouard, J.S. Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 11. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, M.H.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, X.Y. Mutation mechanism of leaf color in plants: A review. Forests 2020, 11, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sun, S.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Feng, J.; Liu, C.; Yang, J. Leaf coloration in Acer palmatum is associated with a positive regulator ApMYB1 with potential for breeding color-leafed plants. Plants 2022, 11, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bugallo, V.; Facciuto, G. Selection process in ornamental plant breeding. Ornam. Hortic. 2023, 29, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tanaka, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Ohmiya, A. Biosynthesis of plant pigments: Anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 2008, 54, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Che, J.; Li, W.; Qin, Y.; Chen, J. Research progress of leaf color variation mechanism in woody plants. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2024, 59, 319–328. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Wang, X.R.; Zhao, Y. Leaf color attributes of urban colored-leaf plants. Open Geosci. 2022, 14, 1591–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- White, T.L.; Adams, W.T.; Neale, D.B. (Eds.) Forest Genetics; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Assis, T.F.; Resende, M.D.V.D. Genetic improvement of forest tree species. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2011, 11, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Duan, H.; Cao, S.; Zheng, H.; Hu, D.; Lin, J.; Lin, H.; Hu, R.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y. Variation in the growth traits and wood properties of Chinese fir from six provinces of southern China. Forests 2016, 7, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zsuffa, L. A Summary Review of Interspecific Breeding in the Genus populus L.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Bouvet, J.M.; Makouanzi, G.; Cros, D.; Vigneron, P.H. Modeling additive and non-additive effects in a hybrid population using genome-wide genotyping: Prediction accuracy implications. Heredity 2016, 116, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Mullin, T.J.; Park, Y.S. Estimating genetic gains from alternative breeding strategies for clonal forestry. Can. J. For. Res. 1992, 22, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wu, H.X.; Matheson, A.C. Genotype by environment interactions in an Australia-wide radiata pine diallel mating experiment: Implications for regionalized breeding. For. Sci. 2005, 51, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liang, D.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, K.; Liu, G.; Zhao, X.; Qu, G.Z. Evaluation of Betula platyphylla families based on growth and wood property traits. For. Sci. 2018, 64, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chen, S.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, J. Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat markers for, and genetic diversity analysis of Liquidambar formosana. Forests 2020, 11, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dong, M.; Zhou, L.; Yu, N.; Li, R.; Wu, S.; Yang, J.; Su, J. Genetic parameters and selection responses for important breeding traits in Liquidambar formosana based on a provenance–family trial. Forests 2023, 14, 2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Costa e Silva, J.; Borralho, N.M.; Potts, B.M. Additive and non-additive genetic parameters from clonally replicated and seedling progenies of Eucalyptus globulus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108, 1113–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Berguson, W.E.; McMahon, B.G.; Riemenschneider, D.E. Additive and non-additive genetic variances for tree growth in several hybrid Populus populations and implications regarding breeding strategy. Silvae Genet. 2017, 66, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Nirsatmanto, A.; Sunarti, S. Genetics and breeding of tropical acacias for forest products: Acacia mangium, A. auriculiformis and A. crassicarpa. In Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 6, pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
- Rezende, G.D.S.; de Resende, M.D.V.; de Assis, T.F. Eucalyptus breeding for clonal forestry. In Challenges and Opportunities for the World’s Forests in the 21st Century; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 393–424. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, R.E.; Asner, G.P.; Sack, L. Genetic variation in leaf pigment, optical and photosynthetic function among diverse phenotypes of Metrosideros polymorpha grown in a common garden. Oecologia 2007, 151, 387–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grattapaglia, D.; Resende, M.D. Genomic selection in forest tree breeding. Tree Genet. Genomes 2011, 7, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hoch, W.A.; Zeldin, E.L.; McCown, B.H. Physiological significance of anthocyanins during autumnal leaf senescence. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hu, K.; Han, K.; Dai, S. Regulation of plant anthocyanin synthesis and pigmentation by environmental factors. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2010, 45, 307–315. [Google Scholar]
- Azuma, A. Genetic and environmental impacts on the biosynthesis of anthocyanins in grapes. Hortic. J. 2018, 87, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Bian, L.; Shi, J.; Zheng, R.; Chen, J.; Wu, H.X. Genetic parameters and genotype–environment interactions of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in Fujian Province. Can. J. For. Res. 2014, 44, 582–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, Y.; Suontama, M.; Burdon, R.D.; Dungey, H.S. Genotype by environment interactions in forest tree breeding: Review of methodology and perspectives on research and application. Tree Genet. Genomes 2017, 13, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Braga, R.C.; Paludeto, J.G.Z.; Souza, B.M.; Aguiar, A.V.; Pollnow, M.F.M.; Carvalho, A.G.M.; Tambarussi, E.V. Genetic parameters and genotype × environment interaction in Pinus taeda clonal tests. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 474, 118342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yuan, C.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, G.; Zheng, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, L.; Tong, H. Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions influencing growth and productivity in Masson pine in east and central China. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 487, 118991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
| No. | Family | Superior Tree Traits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree Height (m) | DBH (cm) | Clear Bole Height (m) | ||
| 1 | NP01 | 17.5 | 17.8 | 2 |
| 2 | NP02 | 15.0 | 17.6 | 1.9 |
| 3 | NP03 | 20.0 | 15.0 | 1.8 |
| 4 | NP04 | 16.0 | 20.8 | 2.2 |
| 5 | NP05 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 1.9 |
| 6 | NP06 | 15.5 | 25.0 | 2.7 |
| 7 | NJ01 | 17.5 | 13.2 | 2.2 |
| 8 | NJ02 | 18.0 | 17.3 | 2.3 |
| 9 | JX01 | 15.0 | 16.4 | 2.8 |
| 10 | JX02 | 15.0 | 14.3 | 2.1 |
| Trait | Year | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree height (m) | 2015 | 2.21 | 2.30 | 2.26 | 0.0307 | 1.4 |
| 2016 | 3.97 | 4.26 | 4.10 | 0.0933 | 2.3 | |
| 2020 | 7.56 | 8.55 | 7.98 | 0.2629 | 3.3 | |
| 2023 | 8.72 | 9.71 | 9.25 | 0.2717 | 2.9 | |
| Basal diameter (cm) | 2015 | 3.90 | 4.20 | 4.03 | 0.1052 | 2.6 |
| 2016 | 7.81 | 8.44 | 8.06 | 0.2164 | 2.7 | |
| Diameter at breast height (cm) | 2020 | 9.56 | 11.03 | 9.99 | 0.4217 | 4.2 |
| 2023 | 10.99 | 12.38 | 11.46 | 0.3838 | 3.4 | |
| The proportion of red in leaf color | 2024 | 0.3334 | 0.3423 | 0.3378 | 0.0035 | 1.0 |
| Source of Variation | Mean Square | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015H | 2016H | 2020H | 2023H | 2015D | 2016D | 2020D | 2023D | 2024R | |
| Site | 32.244 ** | 366.460 ** | 2134.228 ** | 2341.596 ** | 170.263 ** | 1013.171 ** | 3529.587 ** | 3469.278 ** | 0.26428 ** |
| Replication | 0.919 ** | 2.765 ** | 7.277 ** | 14.396 ** | 2.234 | 7.963 * | 8.452 | 13.728 ** | 0.00296 ** |
| Family | 0.189 | 0.803 * | 2.712 * | 4.471 ** | 0.617 | 4.087 | 7.521 | 10.735 * | 0.00111 * |
| Site × Family | 0.533 ** | 1.202 ** | 2.423 * | 2.818 * | 2.319 * | 9.511 ** | 9.042 * | 8.984 * | 0.00103 * |
| Site × Rep × Family | 0.345 ** | 0.3714 ** | 3.454 ** | 3.607 ** | 1.512 | 4.397 * | 7.233 ** | 8.674 ** | 0.00128 ** |
| Error | 0.262 | 0.378 | 1.339 | 1.596 | 1.313 | 3.504 | 4.798 | 5.150 | 0.00055 |
| Trait | Variance Components | Genetic Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Site × Family | Site × Rep × Family | Error | Genetic Coefficient of Variation (%) | ||||
| 2016H | ≈0.0000 | 0.01149 | 0.07797 | 0.37837 | - | - | - | - |
| 2020H | 0.00192 | ≈0.0000 | 0.47095 | 1.33892 | 0.6 | 0.0828 | 0.0042 | 0.0512 |
| 2023H | 0.01529 | ≈0.0000 | 0.53507 | 1.60783 | 1.3 | 0.3839 | 0.0283 | 0.0738 |
| 2023D | 0.01139 | 0.02862 | 0.82883 | 5.1801 | 0.9 | 0.1879 | 0.0076 | 0.0403 |
| 2024R | 0.00000241 | ≈0.0000 | 0.00020156 | 0.00056073 | 0.5 | 0.2102 | 0.0126 | 0.0600 |
| Trait | Superior Tree No. | Family | Tree Height in 2023 | Diameter at Breast Height in 2023 | 2024R | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (m) | Genotypic Value (m) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean (cm) | Genotypic Value (cm) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean | Genotypic Value | Genetic Gain (%) | |||
| 2023H | 10 | JX02 | 9.71 | 0.1753 | 1.9 | 12.38 | 0.1752 | 1.5 | 0.3334 | −0.000897 | −0.3 |
| 2023D | 10 | JX02 | 9.71 | 0.1753 | 1.9 | 12.38 | 0.1752 | 1.5 | 0.3334 | −0.000897 | −0.3 |
| 2024R | 4 | NP04 | 9.45 | 0.0777 | 0.8 | 11.27 | −0.0340 | −0.3 | 0.3423 | 0.000972 | 0.3 |
| All traits | 8 | NJ02 | 9.40 | 0.0590 | 0.6 | 11.53 | 0.0151 | 0.1 | 0.3419 | 0.000881 | 0.3 |
| Population Mean | 9.25 | - | - | 11.46 | - | - | 0.3377 | - | - | ||
| Site | Replication | Family | Tree No. | Tree Height in 2023 | Diameter at Breast Height in 2023 | 2024R | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (m) | Genotypic Value (m) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean (cm) | Genotypic Value (cm) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean | Genotypic Value | Genetic Gain (%) | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16.30 | 2.7065 | 29.3 | 22.20 | 2.0199 | 17.6 | 0.3698 | 0.006747 | 2.0 |
| 1 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 15.40 | 2.3610 | 25.5 | 16.80 | 1.0053 | 8.8 | 0.3950 | 0.012044 | 3.6 |
| 1 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 15.20 | 2.2842 | 24.7 | 19.90 | 1.5878 | 13.9 | 0.3403 | 0.000547 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 15.00 | 2.2074 | 23.9 | 10.20 | −0.2349 | −2.1 | 0.2885 | −0.010342 | −3.1 |
| 1 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 14.70 | 2.0923 | 22.6 | 21.00 | 1.7944 | 15.7 | 0.3854 | 0.010027 | 3.0 |
| Mean | 15.32 | 2.3303 | 25.2 | 18.02 | 1.2345 | 10.8 | 0.3558 | 0.003805 | 1.1 | |||
| Population Mean | 9.25 | - | - | 11.46 | - | - | 0.3377 | - | - | |||
| Site | Replication | Family | Tree No. | Tree Height in 2023 | DBH in 2023 | 2024R | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (m) | Genotypic Value (m) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean (cm) | Genotypic Value (cm) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean | Genotypic Value | Genetic Gain (%) | ||||
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 10.50 | 0.4799 | 5.2 | 23.0 | 2.1702 | 19.0 | 0.3036 | −0.007168 | −2.1 |
| 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16.30 | 2.7065 | 29.3 | 22.2 | 2.0199 | 17.6 | 0.3698 | 0.006747 | 2.0 |
| 1 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 14.70 | 2.0923 | 22.6 | 21.0 | 1.7944 | 15.7 | 0.3854 | 0.010027 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 13.00 | 1.4396 | 15.6 | 21.0 | 1.7944 | 15.7 | 0.2946 | −0.009060 | −2.7 |
| 1 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 11.60 | 0.9022 | 9.8 | 20.8 | 1.7569 | 15.3 | 0.3451 | 0.001555 | 0.5 |
| Mean | 13.22 | 1.5241 | 16.5 | 21.6 | 1.9072 | 16.7 | 0.3397 | 0.000420 | 0.1 | |||
| Population Mean | 9.25 | - | - | 11.5 | - | - | 0.3377 | - | - | |||
| Site | Replication | Family | Tree No. | Tree Height in 2023 | DBH in 2023 | 2024R | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (m) | Genotypic Value (m) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean (cm) | Genotypic Value (cm) | Genetic Gain (%) | Mean | Genotypic Value | Genetic Gain (%) | ||||
| 2 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 6.69 | −0.9828 | −10.6 | 6.60 | −0.9113 | −8.0 | 0.5667 | 0.048136 | 14.3 |
| 1 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 12.40 | 1.2093 | 13.1 | 17.60 | 1.1556 | 10.1 | 0.4710 | 0.028020 | 8.3 |
| 1 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 11.00 | 0.6718 | 7.3 | 16.30 | 0.9113 | 8.0 | 0.4562 | 0.024909 | 7.4 |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8.00 | −0.4799 | −5.2 | 14.80 | 0.6295 | 5.5 | 0.4401 | 0.021524 | 6.4 |
| 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 5.09 | −1.5970 | −17.3 | 5.50 | −1.1180 | −10.0 | 0.4395 | 0.021398 | 6.3 |
| Mean | 8.64 | −0.2357 | −2.6 | 12.16 | 0.1334 | 1.2 | 0.4747 | 0.028797 | 8.5 | |||
| Population Mean | 9.25 | - | - | 11.46 | - | - | 0.3377 | - | - | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Fang, Y.; Wang, X.; Fang, L.; Guo, J.; Chen, W.; Wu, W.; Wang, T.; Luo, Z.; Lin, X.; Ye, D.; et al. Joint Selection for Growth and Leaf Color in Superior Trees of Sapium discolor in Fujian Province, China. Plants 2026, 15, 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030452
Fang Y, Wang X, Fang L, Guo J, Chen W, Wu W, Wang T, Luo Z, Lin X, Ye D, et al. Joint Selection for Growth and Leaf Color in Superior Trees of Sapium discolor in Fujian Province, China. Plants. 2026; 15(3):452. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030452
Chicago/Turabian StyleFang, Yanghui, Xuemei Wang, Liang Fang, Jie Guo, Wenping Chen, Wei Wu, Tong Wang, Zhixian Luo, Xun Lin, Daiquan Ye, and et al. 2026. "Joint Selection for Growth and Leaf Color in Superior Trees of Sapium discolor in Fujian Province, China" Plants 15, no. 3: 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030452
APA StyleFang, Y., Wang, X., Fang, L., Guo, J., Chen, W., Wu, W., Wang, T., Luo, Z., Lin, X., Ye, D., Chen, X., & Su, S. (2026). Joint Selection for Growth and Leaf Color in Superior Trees of Sapium discolor in Fujian Province, China. Plants, 15(3), 452. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15030452

