Erratum: Chikako, S.; Yoshihisa, W.; Youichi, T.; Toshitaka, N. Influence of Housing Systems on Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Functions with Aging in DBA/2CrSlc Mice Animals 2020, 10, 746

Chikako Shimizu; Yoshihisa Wakita; Youichi Tsuchiya; Toshitaka Nabeshima

doi:10.3390/ani10050813

,

and

¹

Frontier Laboratories for Value Creation, SAPPORO HOLDINGS LTD., 10 Okatome, Yaizu, Shizuoka 425-0013, Japan

²

Advanced Diagnostic System Research Laboratory, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan

³

NPO Japanese Drug Organization of Appropriate Use and Research, 3-1509 Omoteyama, Tenpaku-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 468-0069, Japan

^*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Animals2020, 10(5), 813;https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050813

This article belongs to the Special Issue Laboratory Animals

Version Notes

Order Reprints

The authors wish to make the following corrections to their paper [1]:

In Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3, the values for the Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA and Two-Way ANOVA columns had typing errors and have now been corrected (see the corrected version of Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 bellow):

Table 1. Results of statistical analysis in Test 1–Test 3.

Table 2. Results of statistical analysis in Test 4.

Table 3. Results of statistical analysis in Test 5.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Shimizu, C.; Wakita, Y.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Nabeshima, T. Influence of Housing Systems on Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Functions with Aging in DBA/2CrSlc Mice. Animals 2020, 10, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Table 1. Results of statistical analysis in Test 1–Test 3.

		Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA	Two-Way ANOVA
		Alive Mice at 96 Weeks of Age	All Mice
Balancing Ability on an Acryl Rod (Test 1)	age	F (11,253) = 20.0, p < 0.001	F (11,365) = 16.6, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,23) = 1.63, p > 0.05	F (1,365) = 14.8, p < 0.001
	age × group	F (11,253) =1.59, p > 0.05	F (11,365) = 1.04, p > 0.05
Horizontal Bar Test (Test 2)	age	F (11,253) = 16.0, p < 0.001	F (11,365) = 17.1, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,23) = 4.10, p = 0.054	F (1,365) = 30.5, p < 0.001
	age × group	F (11,253) = 1.00, p > 0.05	F (11,365) = 0.99, p > 0.05
Wire Hanging Test (Test 3)	age	F (11,253) = 11.0, p < 0.001	F (11,365) = 10.5, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,23) = 26.7, p < 0.001	F (1,365) = 179.0, p < 0.001
	age × group	F (11,253) = 1.00, p < 0.05	F (11,365) = 2.16, p < 0.05

Table 2. Results of statistical analysis in Test 4.

Foot Print Test (Test 4)		Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA	Two-Way ANOVA
Foot Print Test (Test 4)		Alive Mice at 93 Weeks of Age	All Mice
Stride of forefoot	age	F (5,120) = 16.4, p < 0.001	F (5,182) = 18.0, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,24) = 16.4, p < 0.05	F (1,182) = 4.45, p < 0.05
	age × group	F (5,120) = 1.73, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.85, p > 0.05
Sway of forefoot	age	F (5,120) = 10.8, p < 0.001	F (5,182) = 12.2, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,24) = 4.15, p = 0.051	F (1,182) = 3.86, p = 0.051
	age × group	F (5,120) = 0.70, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.56, p > 0.05
Stance of forefoot	age	F (5,120) = 2.48, p < 0.05	F (5,182) = 3.29, p < 0.01
	group	F (1,24) = 0.245, p > 0.05	F (1,182) = 0.0007, p > 0.05
	age × group	F (5,120) = 1.30, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.16, p > 0.05
Stride of hindfoot	age	F (5,120) = 8.51, p < 0.001	F (5,182) = 9.06, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,24) = 14.4, p < 0.001	F (1,182) = 8.26, p < 0.01
	age × group	F (5,120) = 1.19, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.08, p > 0.05
Sway of hindfoot	age	F (5,120) = 2.70, p < 0.05	F (5,182) = 4.65, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,24) = 13.4, p < 0.01	F (1,182) = 10.9, p < 0.01
	age × group	F (5,120) = 2.01, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.31, p > 0.05
Stance of hindfoot	age	F (5,120) = 4.56, p < 0.01	F (5,182) = 3.39, p < 0.01
	group	F (1,24) = 0.85, p > 0.05	F (1,182) = 1.59, p > 0.05
	age × group	F (5,120) = 1.37, p > 0.05	F (5,182) = 1.50, p > 0.05

Table 3. Results of statistical analysis in Test 5.

Locomotor Activity (Test 5)		Repeated Measures Two-Way ANOVA	Two-Way ANOVA
Locomotor Activity (Test 5)		Alive Mice at 96 Weeks of Age	All Mice
Locomotor activity	age	F (8,168) = 8.75, p < 0.001	F (8,268) = 6.76, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,21) = 0.032, p > 0.05	F (1,268) = 0.083, p > 0.05
	age × group	F (8,168) = 0.95, p > 0.05	F (8,268) = 0.554, p > 0.05
Center time	age	F (8,168) = 29.0, p < 0.001	F (8,268) = 26.0, p < 0.001
	group	F (1,21) = 1.20, p > 0.05	F (1,268) = 0.544, p > 0.05
	age × group	F (8,168) = 4.20, p < 0.01	F (8,268) = 2.83, p < 0.001

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Erratum: Chikako, S.; Yoshihisa, W.; Youichi, T.; Toshitaka, N. Influence of Housing Systems on Physical, Emotional, and Cognitive Functions with Aging in DBA/2CrSlc Mice Animals 2020, 10, 746

Conflicts of Interest

References

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics